Jump to content

What if Cal took steroids?


murrayfan420

Recommended Posts

If Cal used steroids - the voters would have to completely change the way they look at putting players in the hall of fame. If Cal did it, McGuire, Sosa, Palmeiro, and maybe even Canseco should be in the hall. It would change the way we all look at baseball because it would go from the thinking that only a certain few did it to a feeling that it was a part of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I had this very discussion with someone yesterday. Their argument was that Cal's streak is suspect to being aided by steroid use because he played every game for 16 years. I simply told him Cal was able to play everyday b/c of his passion and love for the game, taking care of himself, and not being a wuss when he had a minor injury.

Then I asked him if he thinks Gehrig had some help, seeing as how he did the same thing, to which he responded that they played in different eras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What evidence suggests steroid use was widespread before the McGwire/Sosa splurge starting in about 1998?

I know a couple of accusations (Bagwell, Canseco), but nothing I've heard suggests it was widespread prior to, say, 1995.

[EDIT: For the record, I raise this point because I see absolutely no evidence that Cal ever took steroids. Any discussion of this possibility is pure conjecture...I just wanted to make that point.]

I don't have the time right now at work to look up any sources for my 1990-2005 claim, so I'll just admit that I used that time frame soley on things I've read from Canseco and others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be shocked and disappointed. I grew up idolizing the guy. I collected his baseball cards, got any Ripken membrobilla that I could get, and have his autograph that I got in 07 when he was promoting "Get in the Game." I remember always checking the box scores to see how he did too. I for one don't believe that he did use steroids though because he did as said decline, his father's values and how important they are to him seems to be another reason, and it seems that most of the guys his age that did had monster years when they were supposed to be declining. I believe Bonds was 37 the year he hit 73 home runs. Cal was 37 in 97 and I believe hit around 270 with 14 home runs with 75 or so RBIs. Not sure about the OPS but with that 270 average and relatively weak power I am sure it wasn't too great. Then again I was surprised when Palmeiro was revealed and A-Rod too so nothing would really surprise me anymore. I would be disappointed as said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a sad, sad day when heroes like Cal Ripken are questioned simply because of guilt by association.

While I am sickened by the question, it is not out-of-bounds. Looking back at Ripken's career, here's what we do know:

1. He maintained relatively the same weight over the course of his career. Pretty sure he kept same weight from age 25 to his retirement.

2. His best friend (Brady Anderson) has long been a suspected poster child of steriods and other performance enhancers.

3. The majority of Ripken's career occurred before designer steriods ("cream", "clear", and HGH) became proliferated by labs like BALCO, etc. (Someone with a better understanding of history can correct me here, but I always considered the newer, designer steriods and performance enhancers to be recovery agents moreso than mass-building steriods whereas the earlier steriod substances were more muscle builders. See Canseco, McGwire, etc.)

4. Cal did become injured late in his career. One could make the presumption that if he had been using performance enhancers, well then he would not have gotten hurt.

5. Amphetamines and "greenies" were of rampant usage in baseball for a long time. I suspect that most players have tried them, including Cal. However, is this any different than chugging some Red Bull or 5-hr energy, the stimulants of today? I'm glad baseball banned greenies, but to me they are not equivalent to muscle recovery or muscle enhancing drugs of today like HGH, testosterone, designer steriods, etc.

6. Cal was never concerned with numbers and statistics other than playing everyday. You could argue that uncertainty surrounding steriods effects would cause him to stay away for fear of jeopardizing the streak.

Baseball leadership has certainly gotten a better handle on drug testing than before. However, the Mitchell report did not close the past. Baseball leadership's (Fehr, Selig, etc.) failure to address the past has only prompted the press and media to go digging. My hope is that an ambassador will come forward of the non-Canseco variety (McGwire, maybe?) who will not fear ostricization and will speak the truth about drugs in baseball. (And why hasn't Selig appointed a designated position for a chief counsel or officer role of oversight for baseball's drug administration?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it sounds awful... but at this point, I'd probably just shrug. Apologize to me honestly and be detailed and sincere about it, and I'm moving on pretty quickly.

I also agree with this. I am SO done with the steroid scandal its not even funny. Truth is, the testing was done after Cal retired, so unless he admits something there is no chance we would ever know if he did take anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it sounds awful... but at this point, I'd probably just shrug. Apologize to me honestly and be detailed and sincere about it, and I'm moving on pretty quickly.

I'm in the same basic boat. At this point, nothing would surprise me. Disappoint me, perhaps, but not surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was told Cal used steroids, and then asked am I surprised, I would reply, "If I woke up tomorrow with my head sewn to the carpet, I would be no more surprised than I am right now."

Rep for the Christmas Vacation reference. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also agree with this. I am SO done with the steroid scandal its not even funny. Truth is, the testing was done after Cal retired, so unless he admits something there is no chance we would ever know if he did take anything.

Actually at this point, pretty much the only way we find out is if he ADMITS to it on his own volition. And if he did that, I have to say that I'd have more respect for him for just being man enough to say, "Yeah, I did it too."

The only honorable way about this is to just come clean on your own, before the spotlight's cast on you, and apologize sincerely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had this very discussion with someone yesterday. Their argument was that Cal's streak is suspect to being aided by steroid use because he played every game for 16 years. I simply told him Cal was able to play everyday b/c of his passion and love for the game, taking care of himself, and not being a wuss when he had a minor injury.

Then I asked him if he thinks Gehrig had some help, seeing as how he did the same thing, to which he responded that they played in different eras.

I am no expert but wouldn't using steroids increase the chance of being injured? And as for the different eras I would have to say that's a lot of bs if you consider that players today are much more physically fit than those in Gehrig's and furthermore that pitchers don't throw at guys as much as they did in Gehrig's time/\.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like others said, I would be pretty disappointed. I grew up an O's fan because of Cal, and I played baseball because of Cal. I collected his cards and other memorialbilia and followed his career very closely from the time I became a fan to the time he retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...