Jump to content

Report: 3-Team Trade possibility that includes Adrian Gonzalez heating up!


My O's Face

Recommended Posts

For the last few years, a lot of people here have advocated trying to get Gonzalez, myself included. But now, the growing consensus seems to be that he would cost us too much in young talent. That means we have to look at other options.

Out of curiosity, I checked Gonzalez’s MiL stats, and then compared them to those of Brandon Snyder. I was somewhat surprised to see how similar they were at comparable ages.

Could it be that Snyder is our Adrian Gonzalez?

Gonzalez

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=gonzal001adr

Snyder

http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=snyder002bra

Gonzalez was in AA at age 20, Snyder at 22. I'd definitely give Gonzalez the edge based on MiL history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonzalez was in AA at age 20, Snyder at 22. I'd definitely give Gonzalez the edge based on MiL history.

Maybe....but like Gonzales (excluding a late season call up), Snyder will likely see the majors this year, at age 23, the same age Gonzales did. And when Snyder arrives, he will likely assume the role of F/T first baseman.....something Gonzalez didn't achieve until age 24.

And like Gonzalez, I can see Snyder's power rapidly developing at the ML level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading for A Gon has never been a question of whether or not we have the prospects to pull off the trade.

Instead, it has been more a function of obtaining a 5-6 WAR player but giving up players that in aggregate could potentially total 15+ WAR.

The O's are not 5-6 WAR away from contention. We need to hit the prospect lottery and have many of these guys emerge as as above average to all-star caliber players.

It's a simple as that.

Quite the contrary, IMO. Most of the youth that has been building, like you said, is now ready. We are basically two serious pieces away, IMO. Gonzalez and one other big time pitcher, Lackey, or something else next year, something. With Fiortenio, Scott, Reimold, Gathright (hit .325 in 330PA last year in Norfolk), etc. etc. I think we can expend a solid outfielder. If you add a big time pitcher, paired with Guthrie, Berg, Tillman, Matusz, Patton, Arrieta, Erbe, Britton, etc. etc. I think we could also expend a pitcher. So long as the other two/three pieces are AA or below I think A Gon could be the missing link.

A Gon has two cheap years left, if in that time we can mount at least one serious run I think the rise in att. could get him extended. The question, what packaged are we going to have to compete with and what pitcher is the big time anchor?

If you keep the core: Jones, Markakis, Weiters, and Roberts....

Add A Gon

Then the rotation sits with:

Lackey (someone similiar), Mautsz, Tillman

It is really not expensive, which could also lead to the chance of signing a big time closer: Mike G., Valverde, Wagner (cheaper), etc. etc.

I think that would match up well to:

Jeter, Damon, Tex, A Rod, Cano (assuming Damon resigns)

C.C., Burnett, Hughes/Joba

M. Rivera

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Riddle me this how do you plan on getting A Gon when you don't mention trading anyone in the core to obtain him. If you think SD is going to just hand him over I've got some beach front to sell you in Kansas.

I'm saying Scott, Gathright, Fiortenio, Pie, Reimold: one or two would reap something.

One high ceiling pitcher, Arrieta or anyone but Mautsz/Tillman. Then three high level prospects. We have last year's overall number five pick starting his way through the minors this year and supposedly he has 95 MPH all day. I think we can expend a Hernandez, Arrieta, Reimold/Pie, Scott, prospect for A Gon and be a MUCH better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying Scott, Gathright, Fiortenio, Pie, Reimold: one or two would reap something.

One high ceiling pitcher, Arrieta or anyone but Mautsz/Tillman. Then three high level prospects. We have last year's overall number five pick starting his way through the minors this year and supposedly he has 95 MPH all day. I think we can expend a Hernandez, Arrieta, Reimold/Pie, Scott, prospect for A Gon and be a MUCH better team.

You're not getting Gonzalez without giving up any elite level prospects or young MLB players.

You've gotta include one of Jones, Wieters, Matusz, or Tillman to get him. Anything short of that, and the Padres will go elsewhere. Reimold and Arrieta are nice prospects, but neither are a top-20 guy that SD will be looking for to headline the package.

Gonzalez isn't quite the guy Miguel Cabrera is, but the Tigers gave up two top-10 in all of MLB prospects to land him. Something like that is what the Padres are looking for, not 3 good but not great prospects and a guy they can't afford (Scott).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think SD is going to just hand him over I've got some beach front to sell you in Kansas.

I believe this property is spoken for...

I say we trade Liz for Tex, Chris Ray for A Gon (backup 1B) and if we can get Eaton back, send him to Toronto for Halladay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying Scott, Gathright, Fiortenio, Pie, Reimold: one or two would reap something.

You do know that Gathright was traded to Boston this summer, and Fiorentino is a free agent because he declined his outright assignment when he was taken off the 40-man roster? Not that either of them had any trade value, and their only real value to the Orioles was as possible 4th or 5th outfielder in case of injuries to the starters. Scott has some value but not in a trade for someone like A-Gon. Pie or Reimold could be part of a package, but it would likely have to also include at least two of the young starting pitchers, one of whom was in Baltimore last year (Matusz or Tillman, not Berken or Hernandez). It's just not worth the organizational cost - right now.

For everyone wanting a Frank Robinson type deal, keep in mind that when the Orioles had that busy offseason in 1965 they had already won 94 games that season. The system had already brought a bunch of guys up and integrated them into the majors, and had more on the way. We're at least a year behind that now. The team should always try to improve, every year. It's just not reasonable to expect to make all the moves necessary to try to win the Series in 2010 at the expense of the long term strength and stability of the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are going with no? I think we as much as any team could possibly be in need of the A Gon trade.

25 teams could. Including the one he's on now.

We have LOTS of prospects

Lots? No.

over filled OF

Arguable.

nobody at 1B or 3B

Wrong.

nobody that can hit 30HRs (for sure)

Wrong (even if we make the deal).

and the Big Three are here.

Matusz, Tillman and Bergesen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Kyle Stowers has 12 ABs and is already worth.1 bWAR. Hays is -1.0, and Mullins and Santander combined are .7 (Cowser, despite his exciting throwing, is 1.1) So there is ample reason to play Stowers….and to sit Hays/Mullins/Santander.
    • After watching Hernandez for years it became obvious that for most close calls he'd just flip a coin in his head and hope for the best. IMO the straw that broke the camel's back was the Mets / Tigers game where Angel ruled a pitch to Spencer Torkelson was a foul tip, which is reviewable. When the Tigers' manager came out to challenge the call Hernandez all of a sudden changed his call to a check swing, which isn't reviewable. Replays showed the pitch wasn't a foul ball and Torkelson never came close to swinging at it. It is reasonable to conclude that Angel Hernandez changed the original bad call to an even worse call just so he wouldn't be overruled by replay officials.    
    • Great, I’m heading to the Balkans in a few days anyway.  Im not saying I enjoy cock fights or dog fights, I am just saying I enjoy the collisions. I don’t want either guy to get hurt any more than, that sucked and am going to feel that in the morning. I thought it was great when they came in hard to second and the double play wasn’t automatic. Now you have the ghost tag of the base and the runner just jogs out of the way. I guess it is hard to explain but it is the difference of the NBA 30 years ago and now. Or NFL or MLB. 
    • Well, my personal spin on what OOO was saying is that Mike shouldn’t be adding guys like this one, and should instead be adding guys who will be a net positive. If there’s a glut, do something about the glut.
    • Tweaking guys is for the off-season and spring training not for when you really need guys who know what they’re doing already. Our pen is weak and this fellow doesn’t make it better, but worse. There’s nothing in his portfolio to indicate anything else. I realize the trade was probably actually for the other guy, but this fellow could easily have been immediately designated, cleared waivers, and then added to Norfolk, and then they could play around with him all they want. I remember when Brian Matusz was traded to the Braves along with a competitive balance pic which Dan did not value, and the Braves immediately designated him. They weren’t going to let him anywhere near a mound. Thats what should have been done with this guy.  Mr Vespi must be in tears, because he’s thinking “they wanted THIS guy more than me???”
    • Per Ump Scorecard, this year CB Bucknor and Manny Gonzalez are either 1-2 or 2-1 worst, depending on whether you judge them by average accuracy, or by accuracy above/below expected accuracy.  Out of 85 umpires, Hernandez was 19th worst in the former and 9th worst in the latter.  https://umpscorecards.com/umpires/
    • I am perfectly content to let all these "other teams" be losers for every bit as long as they think serves their best interests.  I'd also like to say I respect people and organizations who stand on principle, but in this case I really don't see the point.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...