Jump to content

Stuff


bigbird

Recommended Posts

Just spoke to my contact. He said it's busy as all get out. Flanny and Duquette have their ears glued to their cells. He still thinks there will be a number of moves by the 31st. Recap of some things he said:

Don't look for a trade for Abreu. He wants the option picked up and we think we can address 2 needs for his salary.

Penn will not be called up until Lopez is traded. (Arizona or Texas?)

Scouting Shealy and still a chance he's acquired

Hawkins is generating a lot of interest and he too will be gone before the 31st.

Good chance Millar stays.

Will see some sort of bullpen shake up at the deadline

No interest in Hillenbrand

Some interest in Mench

He'll call if he hears anything concrete. Need to see if Belkast has heard anything from his contact

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It's a theory I guess. But I think we need one Bobby Abreu more than another Kris Benson & Melvin Mora. Nothing against those guys but that's what you get for half Abreu's salary, decent but not impact players. Give me the one impact guy for the money.

Give me Burrell instead ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a theory I guess. But I think we need one Bobby Abreu more than another Kris Benson & Melvin Mora. Nothing against those guys but that's what you get for half Abreu's salary, decent but not impact players. Give me the one impact guy for the money.

Angelos and his boys rarely do anything but bargain shop as you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to ask if Abreu is worth his salary. Some interesting info from ESPN:

Still, Abreu also has a lower slugging percentage this year than Scott Hatteberg, Josh Willingham and Edgar Renteria, and some people think he's an $8 million to $10 million player who just happens to be signed for $15 million next season. Now that agent Peter Greenberg has confirmed that Abreu wants his 2008 option exercised in exchange for waiving his no-trade clause, potential acquiring clubs are looking at a $30 million commitment, at a minimum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they could acquire Shealy who will be making the minimum for 3 years.

Anyway what 2 guys could we possibly get for 6-7 million per that will have as much impact as Abreu?

I am simply amazed that the FO will not make this deal. Simply amazed.

JAson Schmidt and Craig Wilson.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BB, statistically Derek Jeter isn't worth 18 or 20 million. ARod isn't worth 25 million. Very few guys are actually worth their contracts. So he's a little overpaid. Is Kris Benson really worth 7 million when Chen & Rodrigo pitched the same or better last year for about 2 million each? Abreu might slug worse than Scott Hatteburg but he gets on base about as much as Babe freakin Ruth. :D Just kidding.

Too bad we don't have the luxury to have a lot of over paid players on the roster. I just don't think you can be successful on budget with 2 players accounting for over 1/3 of your payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JAson Schmidt and Craig Wilson.....

I don't think there's any way that Schmidt gets only 6-7 million.

It's a shame that the O's think this way, because they are completely wrong. This team needs another impact bat for the middle of the order, not another solid complimentary guy like we are currently stocked with. And to get a player like that (I'm not necessarily saying that Abreu is the guy) you need to spend 12-15 million. This is the kind of thing that our front office seems to like (Benson, Hernandez, Mora, etc.) and though they are nice players, you need 3-4 GREAT players to compete in this division. And until they ante up for a few more "Tejada-type" guys, we will continue to be mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad we don't have the luxury to have a lot of over paid players on the roster. I just don't think you can be successful on budget with 2 players accounting for over 1/3 of your payroll.

I suppose, and getting a Schmidt would allow us to move young arms for more pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's likely that Shealy would at the very least match what Craig Wilson's production. The guy's not that good...He's an average player who will be getting a 3/18-21 contract from someone. If you sign him you settle for mediocrity unless you have a lot of good players around him.

Jason Schmidt would be great but is pitching really going to be our biggest need next year? Aside from the Rodrigo/Chen fiasco offense has been much more of a problem the past few years, and that only figures to get worse as the pitching certainly looks to be getting better fast.

Wilson's OPS would be 2nd on the Orioles.....If he's not that good, we have a ton of problems my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...