Jump to content

Good chance we might be dropping down the draft board


Recommended Posts

I'll take a strong finish and progress made by our "core" guys over the chance to have another Hobgood in our system.

Just to make a reference here....Hobgood would be a projected 2nd rounder in this draft had he graduated in 2011, just so you know. This draft is honestly capable of being the best in the last 10 years, of course, no one will know for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The current "rep" we're getting as an organization influencing the free agent class FAAAAAR outweighs the spots we are dropping in the draft.

Bring on the free agents and crack open that wallet!!

This a thousand times over. Would Robby Alomar have signed here, if the Orioles weren't on the verge of something, back in the '90's?

Winning solves all problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh 51 98 .342

Seattle 57 92 .383

Arizona 59 91 .393

Baltimore 60 90 .400

Kansas City 61 88 .409

Washington 62 88 .413

Cleveland 62 88 .413

I, for one, couldn't be happier about our slide. :)

Hmmm... Twelve games left: at Red Sox (2), at Jays (3) at TBR (3) and closing out with four at home vs. Tigers

They'll do well to split the 12. That's 66-96, and I have to think that one of the Royals, Nats, and Indians wins at least 66. Even if not, the Cubs are at 68-81 and will cushion the fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty stoked for this upcoming draft. Even at 3-5, the Orioles are in a really good position to take a quality starting pitcher. I agree with MacPhail that growing the arms is the best way to stock a rotation. 2011's draft seems to have plenty of guys worth adding to that rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This a thousand times over. Would Robby Alomar have signed here, if the Orioles weren't on the verge of something, back in the '90's?

Winning solves all problems

The orioles were 71-76 in 1995 and faded late in the season. So it is not like the Orioles were on an upswing, but they were still a very good amount better then this years team. A free agent is not going look too differently at a team that had 95 or 105 losses the previous season no matter how they did in the last month and a half of season. Either way the top free agents will not want to go there by preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only half a game separates us and the Diamondbacks. Fortunately, I know some people have said there's four *big* studs in this upcoming draft, not counting any dark horse candidates that emerge next year.

Pittsburgh 56 103 .352

Seattle 61 98 .384

Baltimore 63 95 .399

Arizona 64 95 .403

Kansas City 66 93 .415

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Sending Jackson down does nothing, there is nothing left to prove down there. He is taking good ABs, he is working counts, he looks fine in the field etc. I have used the Cowser comp, not to say he should be sent down, in the sense that Cowser looked particularly lost at times during his callup last year. Jackson is facing some professional adversity for the first time as a professional keep running him out there.    The fortunate thing is he isn't hurting the team in a significant way right now, and when it finally does click the Orioles will be just that much better. 
    • Actually move Westburg to 7th so there’s not so many lefties in a row. 
    • I’ll go with: Gunnar SS Adley C O’Hearn 1B Tony RF Westburg 3B Mullins CF Cowser LF Kjerstad DH Holliday 2B  
    • The question is, can he be productive playing just 1-2 times a week? We don't know because he's never really been in that role. Not everyone can stay productive in a part-time role. I think the Orioles will find a way to get him in the lineup 4-5 days a week. He can play corner outfield (except I would not play him in LF in Camden), DH and 1B. He still does not look great at 1B, but he can be serviceable if it means getting his bat into the lineup. That's a decent amount of ways to keep him and others fresh. Santander probably is at risk to sit a bit more than usual, but this also gives the Orioles an opportunity to have a very left-handed heavy lineup against righties at times, with Mountcastle sitting. The Orioles left-handed heavy lineup could be: 1. Henderson - SS 2. Rutschman - C 3. O'Hearn - 1B 4. Santander - RF 5. Cowser - LF 6. Mullins - CF 7. Westburg - 3B (R) 8. Kjerstad - DH 9. Holliday - 2B Imagine having to face that lineup and then have Mountcastle, McCann, Urias and Mateo for pinch running as a bench. Now don't get me wrong, Mountcastle is not going to be benched all that much, but Kjerstad could give Santander, Cowser, Mullins (with Cowser moving to CF), O'Hearn, Mountcastle, and Rutschman when he DHing a day off.  That's a lot of ways to keep him fresh and get his bat in the lineup.  
    • If so, probably just for 2 days or so.  
    • Well, there are now 8 days left in April, so 8 days based on last year.  After that, if I recall correctly, he turns into a pumpkin until October.
    • Kjerstad also has had pretty good success vs. LHP in his career.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...