Jump to content

Mazzone admits Braves doctored balls?


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/21/so-those-great-90s-braves-teams-were-doctoring-baseballs-awesome/

Sure doesn't sound like he was just joking around.

Mazzone: “Well, you had pine tar, that’s for sure, because when you were in the postseason and it got called, one time Smoltzy had it on his shoes and I said, ‘John, you can’t keep bending over and touching your shoes all the time. Let’s put it someplace else!’ (laughs)”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I know that in my little ball bag I had firm grip and all kinds of goodies to take care of a baseball to get a little more movement on it

Where's the outrage from people who care so much about cheating? Oh yeah, they just care about PED's. Oh no, actually they don't care about many PED's, even illegal ones, they just care about steroids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty astounding if true. They played that Mazzone sound clip on MLB Tonight yesterday with Smoltz on the set and he seemed dumbfounded. He categorically denied everything Mazzone said but what else could he say? I guess there's really no way of knowing unless someone decides to analyze old video footage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty astounding if true. They played that Mazzone sound clip on MLB Tonight yesterday with Smoltz on the set and he seemed dumbfounded. He categorically denied everything Mazzone said but what else could he say? I guess there's really no way of knowing unless someone decides to analyze old video footage.

He might come clean if he gets into the HoF. Right now its a story that could damage his chances once he is safely in it might just become an amusing anecdote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aside from whether or not the Braves doctored balls back in the 90s, what is up with Mazzone? You think he would realize an admission like that would make some waves. How could he keep that in for the last 15 years and just now start casually joking about it? Maybe he was just joking and didn't realize someone would take him seriously but that seems pretty naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume you feel the same way about steroids?

I mean, I don't really care. Nearly everyone was/is looking for some sort of edge. I am not a part of the witch hunt. For every Barry Bonds there are 4 Gary Cates Jrs who couldn't get passed single A ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...