Jump to content

For what it's worth......


Belkast

Recommended Posts

I heard something about LaRoche playing for Team USA and just tearing the cover off the ball. Anyone have any details on this?

I think tearing the cover off the ball is illegal. I think you can knock the cover off the ball, doing that is fine. But tearing it off is illegal. I think Gaylord Perry used to do that, but they could never catch him at it. But it's still illegal. Are you saying this guy cheats? While playing for Team USA? He's playing for his country and he cheats? Just what we need, another cheater. I'd rather keep Bedard than get another cheater. Getting another cheater would be almost as bad as getting another clubhouse cancer. Cheaters and cancers. That's what we've had for the last 10 years. Isn't this exactly the kind of PA-strategy-thing that we need to stop? Sounds like you just want to continue that same old strategy. Yeah, that's a great plan. That's just what we need, 10 more years of the same old thing.

(Sorry. This is the first Saturday since college football, and I haven't adjusted yet, so I'm bored.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I was too late to the other Wood thread to "contribute".

I hear Wood is a real stand up guy.

Potential headline: Wood laid up, experiencing stiffness.

Okay I'm done.

Haha well done

I'd really like to see Wood in an O's uniform to be honest. I'd like to think we can get Wood + 1 other for Tejada, but so it goes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Belkast.

Has either side (in any of the deals) suggested that the O's do something extra to get exactly what they want? For instance, either a) taking back some salary or b) sending DCab/Reimhold/Millar/Olson/Penn/Mora/Ramon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think tearing the cover off the ball is illegal. I think you can knock the cover off the ball, doing that is fine. But tearing it off is illegal. I think Gaylord Perry used to do that, but they could never catch him at it. But it's still illegal. Are you saying this guy cheats? While playing for Team USA? He's playing for his country and he cheats? Just what we need, another cheater. I'd rather keep Bedard than get another cheater. Getting another cheater would be almost as bad as getting another clubhouse cancer. Cheaters and cancers. That's what we've had for the last 10 years. Isn't this exactly the kind of PA-strategy-thing that we need to stop? Sounds like you just want to continue that same old strategy. Yeah, that's a great plan. That's just what we need, 10 more years of the same old thing.

(Sorry. This is the first Saturday since college football, and I haven't adjusted yet, so I'm bored.)

NW Mo. St. against Grand Valley St is on! It ain't much, but it's football...hold on as long as you can...:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has either side (in any of the deals) suggested that the O's do something extra to get exactly what they want? For instance, either a) taking back some salary or b) sending DCab/Reimhold/Millar/Olson/Penn/Mora/Ramon?

You know, you'd think a NL team would be interested in Mora because he can play different positions. Even if he doesn't start, a manager can insert him in the lineup after pinch-hitting in several different places. He'd still have value over there for a couple more years anyway.

It's not even necessary to trade him alone. Put him in a package with someone, say Olson, and even eat some salary. That might bring back something worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, you'd think a NL team would be interested in Mora because he can play different positions. Even if he doesn't start, a manager can insert him in the lineup after pinch-hitting in several different places. He'd still have value over there for a couple more years anyway.

It's not even necessary to trade him alone. Put him in a package with someone, say Olson, and even eat some salary. That might bring back something worthwhile.

About Mora - I'd think LA would rather have him than Tejada. They know he can play 3rd base or LF competently. They seem to have questions about LaRoche's back, so he could at least be a safety net there, and if the Dodgers want to dump Pierre - which I think they do - Mora can play LF for them. His versatility seems to be a real good fit for them. We've been talking about including either Payton or Tejada in a Dodgers deal, but Mora makes more sense for both teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About Mora - I'd think LA would rather have him than Tejada. They know he can play 3rd base or LF competently. They seem to have questions about LaRoche's back, so he could at least be a safety net there, and if the Dodgers want to dump Pierre - which I think they do - Mora can play LF for them. His versatility seems to be a real good fit for them. We've been talking about including either Payton or Tejada in a Dodgers deal, but Mora makes more sense for both teams.

The problem with that is Mora's NTC. He's already stated he wants to stay on the East Coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with that is Mora's NTC. He's already stated he wants to stay on the East Coast.

Wonder how much it would cost to change his mind. Everyone has a price. Whether the Orioles would be willing to pay it is another question, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just spoke to my guy and the Bedard sweepstakes have been narrowed down to the Dodgers and the Mariners. It seems that Bedard being here opening day is very, very unlikely as I was told. Also said we are in very "deep conversations" with the Cubs about Roberts and feels like that deal will eventually get done as well. Still talking to the Angels about Tejada and we have realized we need to drop our demands some if we want to move him. That's all I have right now. Once again when I have more I will be happy to pass it along.

Please call your guy for me:( Tell him NO to trading My Perfect One k?:002_scry:

Thank You!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Since April 23. 7 for 28 including 2 doubles, 1 triple, and 1 homer.   5 walks.  3 strikeouts.  
    • I’d be very surprised too but it’s all about talent and where you draft.  At 22 it’s tough to get high ceiling talent.  I’d guess Brecht is a reliever at the next level but he’s got dominant reliever upside.  His stuff, reportedly, is as good as any pitcher in the draft.  95 strikeouts in 55 innings as a starter.  
    • He's already a HOF.  It's just that his injuries have killed his chances of being an Inner Circle HOF.
    • With three more hits today, Etzel is at .360/.992. He has 171 MiLB at bats, so a third of a season. Which projects to a full season with:  513 AB 111 R 39 2B 12 3B 12 HR 114 RBI 93 BB 123 SO 90 SB 21 CS .339 AVG .445 OBP .532 SLG Not too shabby!    
    • I would love for someone to explain or justify to me how in the world Mullins catch on 4/15 is listed at 65% catch probability. There are a couple of guys in the league that make that catch but it’s a very short list. Maybe I just don’t understand the stat.
    • Not sure a pitcher technically can get “squeezed” by the automated strike zone but Povich had a number of borderline pitches tonight that could go the other way.  Handley was visibility perturbed by a few of the calls on walks and Povich doubled over in disbelief on a couple of walk calls. He reminds me a little of Tom Glavine how he throws, his wind up, how he hides the ball and how it explodes out his hand….sort of effortless. I heard the announcer for the Sound say Povich’s curveball hasn’t had a hit against it all year long and every other pitch is around .100 batting avg against.  In person, his fastball has a lot more giddy up than the radar shows.  98 pitches tonight and looks like he has a rubber arm.  
    • a game you'd hope Mullins, Mountcastle or Santander would step up and were let down. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...