Jump to content

Attendance to Date: 12.5% Over 2011


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

Here is my guess:

Projected O's 2013 salaries

1) 15.35m Markakis

2) 10m Roberts

3) 8.833m Jones

4) 8m Reynolds

5) 7.416m Hardy

6) 6M Hammel

7) 4.070m Wada (starts the year on the DL)

8) 4m Wieters

9) 4m J Johnson

10) 3.655m Chen

11) 2m Andino or trade for a 2b/3b

12) 2m McLouth

13) 1.7m O'Day

14) 1.5m Davis

15) 1.45m Matusz

16) 1.3m Patton

17) 1.245m Bundy

18) 1.2m Ayala

19) 1m Hunter

20) .6m Reimold

21) .6m Teagarden

22) .5m Strop

23) .5m Gonzo

24) .5m Tillman

25) .48m Machado

26) infielders

27) .16m S Johnson

Total 88.059m

That is without Betemit who is owed $2m but I think gets traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The anemic season ticket numbers have a lot to do with it. We don't have that baseline cushion of guaranteed sold seats. However, you're absolutely right that some of those games had terrible attendance. I do think that part of the season was the turning point though, as the team has had at least a couple epic collapses in July and August and I can't help but think that the ghosts of 2005 were scaring a sizable number of fans away. With what I expect will be far more impressive season ticket numbers next year, expect it to turn around some.

The Twins are a prime example of season tickets sold. The Twins are terrble but sold about 24,000 season tiicket packages and 2.2 million seats before the season started.

http://www.bizjournals.com/twincities/blog/sports-business/2012/01/twins-ticket-sales-down-but-still.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't analyzed it, but the Orioles will spend significantly more money on several players they already have, like Markakis, Jones, Wieters, Johnson, Hammel and others. I don't care too much exactly what they spend, so long as the moves make sense. I don't want to see spending on players who won't earn anything close to their deals, or who make no strategic sense.
I haven't analyzed it, but the Orioles will spend significantly more money on several players they already have, like Markakis, Jones, Wieters, Johnson, Hammel and others. I don't care too much exactly what they spend, so long as the moves make sense. I don't want to see spending on players who won't earn anything close to their deals, or who make no strategic sense.

That was definitely worth saying twice. Additional payroll will enable us to keep our current core in tact which has immense value even if it lacks the splash of a $150 million dollar FA. This is especially true given the youth on this team. We have a bunch of guys that have not yet entered what is likely to be there most productive years given their ages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs: Orioles winning season paying off at the box office

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/orioles-winning-season-paying-off-at-box-office/

Estimates an additional $8 Million in ticket revenue this season:eektf:

An excellent article. IMO, indirectly, this validates criticisms I have had of our marketing department. They should have been doing games with roll-back pricing in July and

August until demand picked up with the winning.

I agree with comments that increasing payroll is not a ticket to winning, but IMO we are seeing some credible signs of a higher payroll capacity. If our capacity is around $90M-$95M now, I think we can add the $8M in increase ticket sales with at least $7M (my number) in higher parking, concessions and at least a $20M increase (possibly double that amount) in higher MASN revenue. I would estimate that our payroll capacity is now in the ballpark of $125M based on this year's attendance. If we had a similar increase in attendance next year, I believe we are looking at something approaching $140M. The numbers get pretty big if we start talking about attendance of 3M or more.

All this assumes our current payroll capacity is supported by the revenue streams without support from our owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

o

2012 ATTENDANCE:o 2,102,249

AVERAGE PER GAME: 25,954

O

I only went to 3 games at OPACY this year :o, so thank you to all of my fellow Oriole fans that pushed us above the 2 million mark in 2012, as well as above the 25,000 per game mark. :clap3:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...