Jump to content

Are Orioles Going to Make A Blockbuster Deal With Cubs? BR Story


section18

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The team needs a lift right now and the fans are buying tickets. We have fallen to 5 games out already and need to change things a little bit. Garza has a swagger that's lacking with our current staff. If we add him and two hitters I think we can rekindle the fire thats been missing the last two weeks. We could get Garza and Saunders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team needs a lift right now and the fans are buying tickets. We have fallen to 5 games out already and need to change things a little bit. Garza has a swagger that's lacking with our current staff. If we add him and two hitters I think we can rekindle the fire thats been missing the last two weeks. We could get Garza and Saunders.

Is that all? ;)

In all seriousness, part of me is glad these decisions aren't up to...well, me...because I'd be pretty conflicted in re: what to do. I don't think Garza is worth what he's "worth" (in all likelihood) on the trade market. By the same token, for once (unlike 2005), I'd like to see this bloody FO go out and get its guys some freakin' help. Regardless of the fact that the last (how long has it been, a week and a half?) few series have been ugly, the O's are still dead-smack in the middle of the playoff picture. If the FO lets the team fall completely out of things...----, I don't even know what that'll do to my enthusiasm for the game, the Orioles, etc. And I'm not sure I can take another 4-6 years of rebuilding (which, to me, is what would be signaled by failing to buttress the current "core" for a postseason push).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all of our SP Matusz would be the one I would include in a trade if we got a good piece back. I think he would benefit from a change of teams.

Yeah...agree with you here. I think San Diego would be a good fit for him. He wouldn't have to worry about being so fine in a big ballpark like that. He'd also have easier lineups to deal with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like Guthrie did. :rolleyestf:
COL is a very different situation. No one pitches well there, and pitching there can screw you up pitching away as well. If Matusz went to a NL team he would do better. Also I don't think he gets on well with his coaches here, and a change of scenery would do him good
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...