Jump to content

Are Orioles Going to Make A Blockbuster Deal With Cubs? BR Story


section18

Recommended Posts

A story appeared today by James Morisette on the Bleacher Report concerning the Orioles and Cubs possibly making a blockbuster deal that would land them both Cubs pitchers on the trading block and possibly Soriano. We would be giving up several of our current young starters.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1231922-baltimore-orioles-potential-trade-with-cubs-may-send-shockwaves-through-al-east

The Orioles also scouted the White Sox last week and the writer speculates the Orioles may be interested in Jake Peavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
A story appeared today by James Morisette on the Bleacher Report concerning the Orioles and Cubs possibly making a blockbuster deal that would land them both Cubs pitchers on the trading block and possibly Soriano. We would be giving up several of our current young starters.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1231922-baltimore-orioles-potential-trade-with-cubs-may-send-shockwaves-through-al-east

The Orioles also scouted the White Sox last week and the writer speculates the Orioles may be interested in Jake Peavy.

Follow the story back. It's empty. Morisette provides a link to his source right there. Click that link (Jeremy Conn) and it refers to Bruce Levine (ESPN Chicago) as a guest on the Garceau Show (105.7fm here in Baltimore). Jeremy Conn conducts some of the interview. Levine even says in the interview that he doesn't think Dan Duquette would trade any of their real prospects (assumedly Bundy, Machado, Schoop).

So, yeah, noone said anything about a blockbuster deal actually being realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A story appeared today by James Morisette on the Bleacher Report concerning the Orioles and Cubs possibly making a blockbuster deal that would land them both Cubs pitchers on the trading block and possibly Soriano. We would be giving up several of our current young starters.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1231922-baltimore-orioles-potential-trade-with-cubs-may-send-shockwaves-through-al-east

The Orioles also scouted the White Sox last week and the writer speculates the Orioles may be interested in Jake Peavy.

That would be a fascinating trade to say the least. Obviously Arrieta and Matusz can be frustrating, but they could both be TOR starters in time. I wonder what else it would take for us to get that done.

That would go against the prior GM regime's philosophy. We would have to extend those two to justify trading for them IMO. I just don't see that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether the rumor has legs or not, I'd part with Schoop, Arrieta, and Matusz for Dempster, Garza, and Soriano plus cash. Not Machado, though.

I'd be cool with that, except Soriano...but whatever.

You know if MacPhail was here, he'd have this done by now. ;) Dude loved him some Cubbies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be a fascinating trade to say the least. Obviously Arrieta and Matusz can be frustrating, but they could both be TOR starters in time. I wonder what else it would take for us to get that done.

That would go against the prior GM regime's philosophy. We would have to extend those two to justify trading for them IMO. I just don't see that happening.

Not if his intent is to go for it this year. Maybe DD thinks we have a shot to win it all and is tilting into our success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last week I set up a post on why Brandon McCarthy could be our best fit. The following paragraph is from one of my responses to my post;

The more I think about it I don't see Theo helping anynody beat his former team and that includes the NYY. I am a huge Garza fan and have supported trading for him since he was with Tampa. It could still happen but I think McCarthy will be less costly and could be the best choice. Greedy would be trading for Garza and McCarthy. It's not impossible and I think including Hunter or Arrieta or Matusz in packages with Reynolds and Tillman could make the deals happen. I think our starters would all benefit pitching in Oakland's larger park. Hunter has given up 18 HR'S already in 84 innings which is roughly 1 in every 5 innings pitched. Arrieta and Matusz are both west coast guys who probably would like to return there. We need consistency and we don't get it with any of the three starters I mentioned. DD would probably never do what I am suggesting however....a starting rotation of Garza, McCarthy, Hammel and Chen with one of the three mentioned remaining would improve our playoff chances.

Todays Bleacher Report story includes comments almost identical to what I wrote on Wednesday. Dempster is having a great year. He would probably have 10 wins by now if he was pitching for the Orioles with his 2.11 ERA. I would be okay with getting both Cub pitchers to make the deal work. McCarthy is younger, is 6-3 and has a 2.54 ERA. I hope DD has McCarthy on his Radar in case someone else like Theo's former team slides in and tops our offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be cool with that, except Soriano...but whatever.

You know if MacPhail was here, he'd have this done by now. ;) Dude loved him some Cubbies.

Reports surfaced this week that the Orioles reached out to AM to outsource the trade negotiations:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in a small minority, but if there was any package that sent Arrieta, Matusz or Tillman away from the O's, I'd be pleased. I can't stand frustrating baseball, and those three could fill a swimming pool with it.

Thats young players Terror....I think the Orioles would be silly to give up all three for 1/2season of Dempster & 11/2 of Garza....I have o interest in Sorianoso he subtracts not adds value to the cubs. I'd give them Jake or Brian and and two others C types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether the rumor has legs or not, I'd part with Schoop, Arrieta, and Matusz for Dempster, Garza, and Soriano plus cash. Not Machado, though.

I would think that the Cubs could get better than Schoop and Arrieta if they were to deal Garza. I do not think that this story makes sense because the deal for the Cubs does not make any sense. I think that moving Dempster and Soriano saves the Cubs money and that makes sense, but dealing Garza would net a good return IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...