Jump to content

vs. INDIANS 6/30


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

Nice job by Roberts. We got the run in. I thought that ball was gonna go off the wall ahhh. Sac Fly. Got the run in, we needed that big time.

I'm certain that wd have been a home run two-three years ago. Roberts has lost some crucial power. (Same thing with a few flyballs in other games since his return.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 275
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This is where that mental blunder by Flaherty hurts us... If he was on 2nd he would have scored. Of course can't really talk about "could haves" never know...

He didn't run hard to 1B, then he didn't round the bag as he should have. Second day in a row he's had a brain fart. He's not good enough to be able to afford those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No real excuse for lack of hustle esp when youre trying to prove yourself

Sorry to say this, but Flaherty does appear sometimes to be unjustiably self-satisfied. Trotted down to first on that single as if he'd hit it out of the ballpark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't run hard to 1B, then he didn't round the bag as he should have. Second day in a row he's had a brain fart. He's not good enough to be able to afford those.

I think he IS good enough... and hopefully learning lessons for all these blunders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Here’s the thing (right now), we have 6 starters (one too many) and not enough good relievers (certainly none who can pitch more than an inning). Kremer has issues (this season) the more times that he does through the lineup (especially the third time through). It seems plausible to me that the switch given Kremer’s stuff would be better for everyone where Kremer may even at a tick in velo and be better at getting strikeouts as a reliever. And Irvin who has been an excellent starter (thus far) could continue in that role.
    • On one hand, it's always a bad thing when a pitcher has to get a 4th out, either because of an error or an umpire's mistake. On the other hand, a pitcher still has to execute and can't serve up a meatball. That being said, that was probably the most impactful non-strike call I can remember this year, maybe a few years.   EDIT: From Melewski - "Sometimes the strike call you don't get leads to the fastball you throw that leaves the ballpark."
    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...