Jump to content

Will Machado hit for power?


Fired-Up

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. I came on here. Asked a legitamte question and got a pretty frosty reception. It's all good. We'll just have to see if Machado can pick up the power.

Looks into his crystal ball. Asks the question, will Manny Machado ever be a power hitter? Sorry Dionne Warwick was busy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

#winner

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Thank God you are here to make posts like these to set us all straight and add to the discourse. I'm just amazed you can see my fragile ego from way up on that high horse. If only I could be like you and NEVER get into a petty, ego-driven argument, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Ooh! Ooh! Can I nominate "guy who hangs back and tries to drily put down both sides of an argument in a veritable symphony of passive-aggression because he's been burned too many times before to actually try to stake out a legitimate position and thinks that it's easier to be too cool for school than to engage in honest debate but ends up looking like some sort of poser whose ultimate aspiration is to condescend" as a write-in?

I know everyone talks up their candidates - it is awards season, after all - but I really think my guy has a good shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Yeah, except this very post is a sad attempt to demonstrate your intellectual superiority to the people who constantly call you out on your nonsense.

In the twitter-speak format of Malike:

#actor-observer bias#hypocrisy#your own insecurity clothed in sententiousness

I'm not even a part of the "group of [those] posters" you speak--as it was totally pointless to engage, and as I said, indulge him (I know myself how useless it is from my experiencing arguing with you)--but I know those posters' reasons for going after him were more down to lack of self-restraint and the compulsion to point out asinine comments for what they are. Your comment is the only one that's quite clearly our of insecurity and hope to placate your wounded ego, and done in bad faith.

If anything, the posters who were attacking Fired-Up's impotent, absurd assertions were paying him a compliment in doing so. The only people who are really d***s in this whole thing are you, and yes, myself, who stood on the outside and commented on it (but in my defense I'm pretty sure Fired-Up doesn't read my posts, and I'm also not sure if he understands them...particularly the "extinction" one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank God you are here to make posts like these to set us all straight and add to the discourse. I'm just amazed you can see my fragile ego from way up on that high horse. If only I could be like you and NEVER get into a petty, ego-driven argument, right?

I didn't say any names. Wear the shoe as you see it fits.

And it's not about engaging in an ego-driven argument. It's about assuring us the whole time you're above the argument, and yet, engaging in it nonetheless.

And to be clear, you weren't on my mind when I made that post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, except this very post is a sad attempt to demonstrate your intellectual superiority to the people who constantly call you out on your nonsense.

In the twitter-speak format of Malike:

#actor-observer bias#hypocrisy#your own insecurity clothed in sententiousness

I'm not even a part of the "group of [those] posters" you speak--as it was totally pointless to engage, and as I said, indulge him (I know myself how useless it is from my experiencing arguing with you)--but I know those posters' reasons for going after him were more down to lack of self-restraint and the compulsion to point out asinine comments for what they are. Your comment is the only one that's quite clearly our of insecurity and hope to placate your wounded ego, and done in bad faith.

If anything, the posters who were attacking Fired-Up's impotent, absurd assertions were paying him a compliment in doing so. The only people who are really d***s in this whole thing are you, and yes, myself, who stood on the outside and commented on it (but in my defense I'm pretty sure Fired-Up doesn't read my posts, and I'm also not sure if he understands them...particularly the "extinction" one).

If it's nonsense w no basis, both myself and this fired up guy, why go through so much trouble to respond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say any names. Wear the shoe as you see it fits.

And it's not about engaging in an ego-driven argument. It's about assuring us the whole time you're above the argument, and yet, engaging in it nonetheless.

And to be clear, you weren't on my mind when I made that post.

I didn't know if I was who you had in mind or not, but that wasn't the point. Your post was dripping with hypocrisy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...