Jump to content

Will Machado hit for power?


Fired-Up

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. I came on here. Asked a legitamte question and got a pretty frosty reception. It's all good. We'll just have to see if Machado can pick up the power.

Looks into his crystal ball. Asks the question, will Manny Machado ever be a power hitter? Sorry Dionne Warwick was busy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

#winner

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Thank God you are here to make posts like these to set us all straight and add to the discourse. I'm just amazed you can see my fragile ego from way up on that high horse. If only I could be like you and NEVER get into a petty, ego-driven argument, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Ooh! Ooh! Can I nominate "guy who hangs back and tries to drily put down both sides of an argument in a veritable symphony of passive-aggression because he's been burned too many times before to actually try to stake out a legitimate position and thinks that it's easier to be too cool for school than to engage in honest debate but ends up looking like some sort of poser whose ultimate aspiration is to condescend" as a write-in?

I know everyone talks up their candidates - it is awards season, after all - but I really think my guy has a good shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what's sadder and more pathetic:

The OP's need to make outlandish statements to draw attention, or a certain group of posters who can't resist giving it to him merely to display (mainly to themselves) their own intellectual superiority.

It's really an intricate dance of fragile and wounded egos.

Yeah, except this very post is a sad attempt to demonstrate your intellectual superiority to the people who constantly call you out on your nonsense.

In the twitter-speak format of Malike:

#actor-observer bias#hypocrisy#your own insecurity clothed in sententiousness

I'm not even a part of the "group of [those] posters" you speak--as it was totally pointless to engage, and as I said, indulge him (I know myself how useless it is from my experiencing arguing with you)--but I know those posters' reasons for going after him were more down to lack of self-restraint and the compulsion to point out asinine comments for what they are. Your comment is the only one that's quite clearly our of insecurity and hope to placate your wounded ego, and done in bad faith.

If anything, the posters who were attacking Fired-Up's impotent, absurd assertions were paying him a compliment in doing so. The only people who are really d***s in this whole thing are you, and yes, myself, who stood on the outside and commented on it (but in my defense I'm pretty sure Fired-Up doesn't read my posts, and I'm also not sure if he understands them...particularly the "extinction" one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank God you are here to make posts like these to set us all straight and add to the discourse. I'm just amazed you can see my fragile ego from way up on that high horse. If only I could be like you and NEVER get into a petty, ego-driven argument, right?

I didn't say any names. Wear the shoe as you see it fits.

And it's not about engaging in an ego-driven argument. It's about assuring us the whole time you're above the argument, and yet, engaging in it nonetheless.

And to be clear, you weren't on my mind when I made that post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, except this very post is a sad attempt to demonstrate your intellectual superiority to the people who constantly call you out on your nonsense.

In the twitter-speak format of Malike:

#actor-observer bias#hypocrisy#your own insecurity clothed in sententiousness

I'm not even a part of the "group of [those] posters" you speak--as it was totally pointless to engage, and as I said, indulge him (I know myself how useless it is from my experiencing arguing with you)--but I know those posters' reasons for going after him were more down to lack of self-restraint and the compulsion to point out asinine comments for what they are. Your comment is the only one that's quite clearly our of insecurity and hope to placate your wounded ego, and done in bad faith.

If anything, the posters who were attacking Fired-Up's impotent, absurd assertions were paying him a compliment in doing so. The only people who are really d***s in this whole thing are you, and yes, myself, who stood on the outside and commented on it (but in my defense I'm pretty sure Fired-Up doesn't read my posts, and I'm also not sure if he understands them...particularly the "extinction" one).

If it's nonsense w no basis, both myself and this fired up guy, why go through so much trouble to respond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say any names. Wear the shoe as you see it fits.

And it's not about engaging in an ego-driven argument. It's about assuring us the whole time you're above the argument, and yet, engaging in it nonetheless.

And to be clear, you weren't on my mind when I made that post.

I didn't know if I was who you had in mind or not, but that wasn't the point. Your post was dripping with hypocrisy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • I would go Bradish game 1, no question. He's earned it Means game 2 because it's in Camden Yards. Teams will put righties up to face him and we have Waltimore to help protect against the long ball Grayson game 3 on the road Tough choice between Gibson or Kremer for game 4, but I bet Hyde gives the vet the nod. I think that means Bradish is available for game 5
    • I understand your point, but 40 HRs with a solid OBP won’t be a waste no matter where he plays.
    • Adley -  Had pretty much the same results as last year while playing 39 more games which are simply outstanding for a catcher. Handled the pitching staff as a leader, controlled the running game and hit well - 810 OPS. But his offense was very different this year.   In 2002 he hit righties - 889 OPS vs lefties - 552 OPS.  In 2023 he flipped that righties -778 OPS vs lefties  - 895 OPS.   He hits much better as a DH (874 OPS) vs C (786 OPS).  He is an on base machine 374 OBP.   He leads the team and the winning culture with his attitude and hugs. Grade A McCann - Agree Mountcastle - In an injury plagued year that cost him 132 at bats his biggest improvement was to his OBP at 328 compared to 309 in 2021 and 305 in 2022.   He seemed to adjust to the wall that has cost him power by hitting more up the middle.  While sharing 1B with O'Hearn instead of Mancini and DH with Adley he killed lefties with a 1052 OPS but fell off vs righties with a 640 OPS.  He seem like a platoon player at times.    He hit better as a DH (900 OPS) vs 1B (754). None of this is consistent on a year over year basis.  Some years he hits rights better, some years lefties, some years better as a 1B and some as a DH.    Grade  C+ while noting his improved OBP which is major IMO. O'Hearn - Agree Frazier - Agree Gunnar -  He has come so far so fast.  Deserves MVO.  Took over SS.  Much better SS than 3B at this point IMO.   Offensive weapon.  Grade A+ Urias -  Fell off in power from 16 HR to 4 HR and drop in  defense may have cost him his spot on the roster.  Grade D+ Mateo - Began the season as a potential starting SS but became a Backup SS.  As a utility player his speed on the base path and ability to steal (32 steals) is a weapon.    A game changer in close games which the O's play a lot.   Defense at SS dropped from elite to be roughly compared to Gunnar which is still a very high level.  Can't hit.  Grade as a utility player is a B-. Hays -  Has become a first half player over the last two years.  All-Star first half followed by a beat up body that costs him offensively in the 2nd half.  He plays hard.  Defensive standout in spite of losing speed as the year goes on due to injuries he plays through.  Wall has cost him some power but like Mountcastle the improved OBP to 325 is a impressive.  Agree with B- grade. Mullins - Agree.  Injuries cost him greatly.  Amazing he can play defense at such a high level even with the injuries. Grade C+ but an All Star when healthy. Santander - Agree Hicks - Wow.  Where did that come from.  Showed up at just the right time with Mullins injury and was a solid performer.   Unexpected.   Not the best backup centerfielder because his speed is average but can catch what he gets to.  Fine in the corners. Grade B- McKenna  - Agree Westburg -  Better that expected at 2B.  Rangy.  Solid.  Not as good at 3B.  SS only in emergencies.   Nice break in to the majors.  Future looks bright.  Grade B looks good.
    • If you play  Texas, they are excellent Vs righties or lefties. OPaCY is much tougher on lefties (and righties) than Globe Field is. So, you may go with GRod in game 2 because the lefties are going to struggle to hit more in OPACY anyway but at the end of the day, it may not make of a difference. They also may just want the rookie pitching at home. Kyle Gibson is intriguing. He has a high OPS against the Rangers but he pitched for them in 2021 And he has a sub 3 ErA at home that year. In its first full year, Globe had a 97 park effect. This year it’s 106.  So that’s a factor too.  
    • Thanks for a great detailed report @Frobby. I'm not sure I understand how the stats for Rutschman and McCann warrant identical B- grades. Sure... Adley missed high expectations and McCann was better than last year's backups, but for me their "test scores" would not each receive the same grade. 
    • Personally I’d rather see Means start a game at Camden than on the road.
    • Texas has more guys hitting from the left side overall, a 50/50 split this year hitting as righties or lefties. Tampa Bay had only 38% of their ABs as lefties. But I think we can beat either team. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...