Jump to content

We like Peralta for LF


andrewrickli

Recommended Posts

If we are not going after a big guy for LF like Choo or Beltran (which we likely are not), then I want McLouth back and Rajai Davis to platoon with him. I think that gives you your best bang for your back and gives you an very good PR late in a game and 4th OFer.

I don't mind Peralta as an add to play 2B or serve as a roving guy. In that situation, he's essentially the DH, but he's playing some SS, 3B, 2B and possibly OF while giving others a partial day off.

I also don't mind Peralta as a guy we are adding with thoughts of a potential trade because he has flexibility to give you options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Peralta is a decent infielder. I think he could be a 3B for sure. But a LF? They'd be moving him from one of the hardest positions on the defensive spectrum to one of the easiest. That would kill his value.

They wouldn't be signing him to play LF long-term. He may play there for a bit, but he'd move back to the INF by 2015 at the latest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go after Braun. I bet the Brewers would love to move him and would definitely kick in a bunch of salary

Ryan Braun lf

8 years/$45M (2008-15)

5 years/$105M (2016-20), plus 2021 mutual option

5 years/$105M (2016-20), plus 2021 option

signed extension with Milwaukee 4/21/11

$10M signing bonus (paid in 4 equal installments each April 1 from 2012 to 2015)

16:$19M, 17:$19M, 18:$19M, 19:$18M, 20:$16M, 21:$15M mutual option ($4M buyout)

price of option may increase to $20M based on MVP, Silver Slugger, Gold Glove awards (if earned, award escalators are deferred without interest)

$18M in salary ($4M each in 2016-18 and $3M each in 2019-20) deferred without interest, to be paid in equal installments each July 1 from 2022 to 2031

no-trade protection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peralta would be an atrocious disaster playing LF every day. For those that whined incessantly at the prospect of Reimold starting in LF last year, they should be more concerned with a rangeless infielder manning a position he has played a total of 18 innings in his career.

I hope this is just some window shopping and nothing serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those clamoring for McLouth over Peralta from a production standpoint, what exactly do you see in Nate's bat that you don't see in Peralta's? They are nearly identical in terms of overall offensive value.

I'm not huge on the McLouth bandwagon myself.... but only one of those two can play LF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand going after Peralta for LF specifically. He likes playing infield, and can play the infield, so aren't you going to end up paying a premium to convince him to 1) come to Baltimore, and 2) play left field?

Maybe he'll be worth 3/42, but again you're chasing value when you need to find surplus value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not huge on the McLouth bandwagon myself.... but only one of those two can play LF.

Right, I'll grant that McLouth is the only natural outfielder. He seems to be about average defensively. I have no idea whether Peralta can play LF, so I'd have to leave that up to evaluators. But Peralta does give some nice flexibility being able to handle the left side of the infield competently. I wonder if Baltimore is actually thinking of Peralta as a left fielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about J.J. Hardy. Do you think he can play left field? Or Manny?

Speaking hypothetically, it's possible but not something I think anyone could know until they tried it. Obviously Manny could probably adapt more easily while Hardy (if he did adapt) would probably take longer. But all that is irrelvant because you're talking about GG infielders who would be wasted at any position other than SS or 3B. Peralta doesn't fit that because he's horrible at SS and passable (or was 4 years ago) at 3B.

We didn't see much of Peralta in LF last year but what we saw wasn't good. Now, it's possible he gets better out there, but I can't see anyone making that distinction without seeing a lot of workout time... something a team isn't going to see until AFTER he's signed. Overall, I don't think his injury history/PED paggage justify that experiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand going after Peralta for LF specifically. He likes playing infield, and can play the infield, so aren't you going to end up paying a premium to convince him to 1) come to Baltimore, and 2) play left field?

Maybe he'll be worth 3/42, but again you're chasing value when you need to find surplus value.

Why would it be hard to convince him to come to Baltimore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...