Jump to content

A Discontented A.J. Burnett


Recommended Posts

Burnett, who will need hernia surgery sometime after the season, hinted after Tuesday's 5-4 loss to the Padres that more health problems have compromised him.

"If I can lift my arm up at the end of the season then I might pitch," Burnett said. "We'll see how it goes."

Burnett has thrown 202 2/3 innings this season, his most since 2009. How does he feel now?

"Horse[bleep]," Burnett said.

Burnett said he has not been himself all season. "But I pitched the best I could," he said. He signed with the Phillies because he believed they offered him a chance at a championship.

"I expected a lot of things to be different," Burnett said. "A lot."

Like what?

"I told you we'll discuss that when the time comes," Burnett said.

source - philly.com
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Phillies?src=hash">#Phillies</a> just announced that A.J. Burnett declined his $12.75-million player option. Surprising. Could have made $14.5M with incenties</p>— Jayson Stark (@jaysonst) <a href="

">November 4, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>A.J. Burnett’s agent, Darek Braunecker: “We do expect that he will pitch in ’15. For a contender.”</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">November 4, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's strange reading all of the responses here and thinking that somehow Jimenez is the better choice going forward. I mean, in what world is one bad year of AJ equal to that of one of Ubaldo and quite possibly three more? Burnett wasn't quite as bad as in the second half of last year either. I would have loved to have been in the position the Phillies were a few days ago when AJ waved goodbye.

We won't be quite as lucky with Ubaldo unless he turns it around. I don't care so much about the negotiations and the reasons why. These guys, most of them, all want to get paid and have their reasons why or why not. I stopped a long time ago thinking they were heroic people.

I'd rather know that for the mid market team I like, one guy's contract won't be a hindrance in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Just add Mayo and Cowser to your list and the roster makes sense.
    • Let's look at the roster requirements.  The active MLB roster allows 26 players. Now do we have 4 outfielders or 5? I would assume we keep at least 13 pitchers with 8 of those in the bullpen. So that would leave 13 position players at best. 2 Catchers, 2 1Bmen, + Gunnar/Mateo/Urias/Westburg as IF utility. So that's 8 infielders all practically guaranteed to make the team from seniority on 2 winning Orioles teams, plus the 3 starting outfielders in Hays/Mullins/Santander. What we have are likely 2 outfield positions, with one of those possibly being another infield uitlity player, but maybe not probable. If they have 2 bench outfielders then at least one of those is probably preferred to be a left handed batter and the other probably to be a right handed batter. They might also want someone who has the skills to play centerfield, unless the scenario that either Mateo or Hays is thought to be the primary backup center-fielder. Which could be a very good idea in order to allow a corner outfielder on the roster.
    • How so? They knew Bradish had a season-threatening injury a month before the trade with Milwaukee, and that Burnes was therefore just filling a hole rather than serving as a true addition to the rotation. ...who merely replaced the incumbent ace of the staff, who may not pitch at all for us in 2024. No real upgrade has actually occurred.  
    • I have to say, if we’re still at a point where signing some SP5 has to be contingent in any way on dumping $3.5M of Ryan O’Hearn — that would be so very disheartening.  I get why folks want to see Kjerstad over O’Hearn. We all want to see Kjerstad. We all want to see the very exciting all-homegrown-prospect lineups we’ve been pontificating about ad nauseum for years now.  But we’re trying to win it all this season, and O’Hearn had a higher wRC+ in the bigs last year than Kjerstad did in AAA. Just dumping a guy who was a critical part of the lineup last year on blind faith seems a bit rash. And unnecessary.  Maybe O’Hearn regresses to his pre-2023 form. Maybe Kjerstad absolutely rakes. The nice thing is, we have the luxury of letting it all play out. It’s a very long season. If O’Hearn hits his way off the team — or Kjerstad hits his way onto it — then great. That’s a miscalculation we can easily (and happily) correct. But if you ship O’Hearn out and then Kjerstad can’t hack it (or gets hurt, that’s much tougher to un-do. 
    • I love the sound of that crack of the bat. It means spring is almost here!
    • Thanks for this. I was actually thinking earlier while browsing the message board that I wanted to follow Hall and was thinking about looking up his stat page.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...