Jump to content

Cruz or Butler


Scrat1

Cruz or Butler  

77 members have voted

  1. 1. Cruz or Butler

    • Cruz for 3/42
    • Butler for 1/10 + pick from Cruz

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Or even Nolan Reimold. He could do that.

Yeah. I just don't see Butler as an upgrade worth spending on. Rather just roll with a cheaper option. Young, Willingham, or a guy like Cuddyer can all produce what Butler will and all be cheaper. Go big or just go cheap. Butler is a signing the Orioles that lost for 14 straight years would make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yeah. I just don't see Butler as an upgrade worth spending on. Rather just roll with a cheaper option. Young, Willingham, or a guy like Cuddyer can all produce what Butler will and all be cheaper. Go big or just go cheap. Butler is a signing the Orioles that lost for 14 straight years would make.

Heck. Steve Pearce is a much better Butler. Get a real outfielder and DH Steve. Against Lefties. Because that is all Butler is good for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If these are the ONLY two options, then I take Cruz

1. He can play the field, giving us more options. I seriously think Weiters is going to see some time at DH this season, but you can't do that and put Butler in the field. With Cruz you can.

2. Butler is coming off a bad year and Cruz's production was great this past year.

3. We underpaid for Cruz this year, so giving him a few million extra than we normally would spend would kinda be like a bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If these are the ONLY two options' date=' then I take Cruz

1. He can play the field, giving us more options. I seriously think Weiters is going to see some time at DH this season, but you can't do that and put Butler in the field. With Cruz you can.

2. Butler is coming off a bad year and Cruz's production was great this past year.

3. We underpaid for Cruz this year, so giving him a few million extra than we normally would spend would kinda be like a bonus.[/quote']

14 a year for three years is Ortiz money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'm not too down on a 1/8 kind of deal for Butler, I like his discipline but am kind of wary of his disappearing power. And I've repeated often that I have no use for an expensive, multi-year deal for Cruz. I doubt Buck wants a regular DH like Butler. Can I have an option C? How about an odd couple platoon of Aoki/Delmon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If these are the ONLY two options' date=' then I take Cruz[/quote']

They're not.

1. He can play the field, giving us more options. I seriously think Weiters is going to see some time at DH this season, but you can't do that and put Butler in the field. With Cruz you can.

Well, he can stand in left field and catch almost everything that's hit within 12 feet of him.

2. Butler is coming off a bad year and Cruz's production was great this past year.

Which tells me they're fairly likely to be heading in opposite directions next year.

3. We underpaid for Cruz this year, so giving him a few million extra than we normally would spend would kinda be like a bonus.

No, that's getting ahead by being efficient and making up for it by lighting your cigars with $100 bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not.

Well, he can stand in left field and catch almost everything that's hit within 12 feet of him.

Which tells me they're fairly likely to be heading in opposite directions next year.

No, that's getting ahead by being efficient and making up for it by lighting your cigars with $100 bills.

Sorry, I only saw two options on the poll. I guess I missed the other one. Seriously, I don't like either one, but if they are the only two, then that's what I would choose. If there are no other choices, this is what I go with. Cruz IS better defensively than Butler. Cruz did have a better season, so recent trends show him going up and Butler going down. And it's not my money, so give it Cruz, rather than Butler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...