Jump to content

Sun-Times says O's want Cedeno, Gallagher, and 2 more prospects


Bigbie03

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 413
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't care who you're talking about. You're out of line and in violation of board rules.

How am I in violation of board rules? Because it is my opinion is that there are Cubs fans that come on here just to start arguments with O's fans and that I don't enjoy reading it all the time. That is my opinion. Perhaps when you say, "I think perhaps you need to find a better way to deal with folks whose opinions don't agree with yours than stereotyping them and calling them names." you should take your own advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if AM would back off of the quantity request for a little more quality. Specifically, I'm thinking Gallagher, Ceda, Cedeno for Roberts.

Payton could be a throw-in for a much lesser prospect or he could conceivably go to the White Sox in a separate deal. Just a thought that's probably been typed about 50 times on the other threads. If so, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How am I in violation of board rules? Because it is my opinion is that there are Cubs fans that come on here just to start arguments with O's fans and that I don't enjoy reading it all the time. That is my opinion. Perhaps when you say, "I think perhaps you need to find a better way to deal with folks whose opinions don't agree with yours than stereotyping them and calling them names." you should take your own advice.

Problem is, he isn't calling anyone names. Calling someone (let alone a whole group of people) a troll is a pretty serious accusation IMO and it is reserved for those who are intentionally causing mischief not just disagreeing with you. If you have a problem, put all the Cubs fans on ignore (heck, put everyone w/ a dissenting opinion on ignore) and you can live in peace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is, he isn't calling anyone names. Calling someone (let alone a whole group of people) a troll is a pretty serious accusation IMO and it is reserved for those who are intentionally causing mischief not just disagreeing with you. If you have a problem, put all the Cubs fans on ignore (heck, put everyone w/ a dissenting opinion on ignore) and you can live in peace.

I see your point and I apologize if I offended anyone. That was not the intent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...