Jump to content

EriKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK Has Left the Building


weams

Recommended Posts

Man, he was one of the few reasons to watch this team in 2006-2007. That curve was ridiculous, he was so much fun to watch when he was dealing. He went from a guy who nibbled and didn't have much success to a guy that just started trusting his stuff and attacking hitters and the difference was remarkable.

Loved how he dealt with the media, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bedard was the last pitcher we had where I would count the days until his next start. He was must see television.

I was lucky enough to have seats right behind home plate for the game he set the single season strikeout record. As one vendor told me that night, from that angle his curve looked like a mirage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, he was one of the few reasons to watch this team in 2006-2007. That curve was ridiculous, he was so much fun to watch when he was dealing. He went from a guy who nibbled and didn't have much success to a guy that just started trusting his stuff and attacking hitters and the difference was remarkable.

Loved how he dealt with the media, too.

Roch had a different opinion:

While former Orioles pitcher Erik Bedard settles into retirement, the assumption being that he'll find a quiet spot to be alone with his thoughts, Chris Tillman takes the mound tonight against the Red Sox and Adam Jones continues to patrol center field while in search of his fifth Gold Glove.

How's that trade working for the Orioles?

Pipe down, Tony Butler.

Bedard was 71-82 with a 3.99 ERA in 11 major league seasons, including 15-14 with a 3.31 ERA in 46 starts with the Mariners over three seasons. He went 40-34 with a 3.83 ERA in five years and 114 games with the Orioles and finished fifth in Cy Young voting in the American League in 2007.

My only beef with Bedard centered on the pure enjoyment he received in being the worst interview in the clubhouse. The smirk stayed with me.

I prefer having a pitcher refuse to talk rather than waste our time at his locker with three-word answers that served no purpose other than to make us look foolish. I saw no point in it. And he wasn't that way while in the minors. I had plenty of friendly exchanges with him.

A few members of the media still found him amusing. For me, the act got old real fast - as did Bedard, judging by his career path.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2015/06/more-notes-before-tonights-game-4.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are not alone on that. I remember a stink being made about that a few times.

There was an awful lot of "real men gut it out when they've got nothing left." My response was always something like "uhh... why do we have 7 or 8 relievers who can come in and throw hard for an inning if you want your starter to pretend he still has something left in the tank in the 7th?" Reply: "I'd rather have real men who lose in the 7th than French Canadian socialist wusses who rely on the pen to win the game." I may be mis-remembering, or potentially exaggerating, that last part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edward gets a worse rep then he should. The whole thanks for getting us Jones and Tillman shtick is real old. Bedard was the best pitcher the Orioles had or have had in the last 15 years. He gave his team a chance to succeed and his rep for not going deep into games is overblown. Back when he was the guy who "might" succeed in the Orioles pitching prospect calvary of the time, he was the only one who made something happen. His slider was downright nasty and he was the last orioles pitcher I can remember I enjoy watching pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only beef with Bedard centered on the pure enjoyment he received in being the worst interview in the clubhouse. The smirk stayed with me.

I prefer having a pitcher refuse to talk rather than waste our time at his locker with three-word answers that served no purpose other than to make us look foolish. I saw no point in it. And he wasn't that way while in the minors. I had plenty of friendly exchanges with him.

A few members of the media still found him amusing. For me, the act got old real fast - as did Bedard, judging by his career path.

Roch couldn't resist the parting shot, could he? But I don't blame him. Bedard was my favorite pitcher to watch since Mussina, but I don't know why he felt he needed to be a horse's ass to the media. It did sort of amuse me, but I can see that it made life very difficult for the reporters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch had a different opinion:

My only beef with Bedard centered on the pure enjoyment he received in being the worst interview in the clubhouse. The smirk stayed with me.

I prefer having a pitcher refuse to talk rather than waste our time at his locker with three-word answers that served no purpose other than to make us look foolish. I saw no point in it. And he wasn't that way while in the minors. I had plenty of friendly exchanges with him.

A few members of the media still found him amusing. For me, the act got old real fast - as did Bedard, judging by his career path.

Who cares what sports media thinks? These people rarely demonstrate they know more than anyone else who can watch the game on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares what sports media thinks? These people rarely demonstrate they know more than anyone else who can watch the game on TV.

They have a job to do, and there is no need to be rude to people who are doing their job. Without these people, there is no postgame show, and there is nothing to read about the game. I don't look for Roch Kubatko for great insights about the game of baseball, but I still think he should be able to do his job and be treated respectfully by the players he interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erik Bedard's legacy is that he brought the Orioles Adam Jones, Chris Tillman and George Sherrill.

He was fun to watch on the field, but he was a tinman who started looking to the bullpen once he closed in on 100 pitches, even in close games where he was still the best option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch had a different opinion:

While former Orioles pitcher Erik Bedard settles into retirement, the assumption being that he'll find a quiet spot to be alone with his thoughts, Chris Tillman takes the mound tonight against the Red Sox and Adam Jones continues to patrol center field while in search of his fifth Gold Glove.

How's that trade working for the Orioles?

Pipe down, Tony Butler.

Bedard was 71-82 with a 3.99 ERA in 11 major league seasons, including 15-14 with a 3.31 ERA in 46 starts with the Mariners over three seasons. He went 40-34 with a 3.83 ERA in five years and 114 games with the Orioles and finished fifth in Cy Young voting in the American League in 2007.

My only beef with Bedard centered on the pure enjoyment he received in being the worst interview in the clubhouse. The smirk stayed with me.

I prefer having a pitcher refuse to talk rather than waste our time at his locker with three-word answers that served no purpose other than to make us look foolish. I saw no point in it. And he wasn't that way while in the minors. I had plenty of friendly exchanges with him.

A few members of the media still found him amusing. For me, the act got old real fast - as did Bedard, judging by his career path.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2015/06/more-notes-before-tonights-game-4.html

Right on point. I was very friendly with Bedard in the minors as well, but the guy caught big leagueitis and apparently decided that being a jerk to the media was fun.

To this day he and Luis Matos are the only players I covered closely in the minors who big leagued me when they got there.

Regardless, as much as he relished being a jerk, he was fun to watch on the mound during his heyday and the Orioles cashed him in at the best time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares what sports media thinks? These people rarely demonstrate they know more than anyone else who can watch the game on TV.

If you're relying on Woody whats-his-name or Tony Kornheiser for your knowledge about any aspect of baseball you're going to be disappointed. Or you have exceptionally low standards. But on some level baseball is entertainment, it relies on public interest to generate revenues, and the media provides free publicity. Bedard, while I thought he was pretty funny, was relying on most everyone else being nice to cultivate that fanbase and interest and revenues that generated his substantial salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last true # 1 we had. His 2007 season was probably the best season we've had from a starting pitcher going back to Mussina's hey day.

The test of a TOR starter is when you look at the schedule and you see that he's pitching, you feel sure the team is going to win. You sort of take it for granted. I had that feeling with Bedard and Mussina (except against the White Sox for Mussina). Not anyone else in the last 20 years. Tillman for a bit, but it was short-lived.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
    • Again, I'm not sure what the point of contention is. They won 91 games and lost in the Wildcard round.  That puts them smack in the middle of what I forecast as their most likely outcome, though I did hope for more playoff success.  I'm not sure how that is proof I misevaluated anything. Further, again, lecturing me about the importance of depth, when I'm one of the biggest hoarders on this board, and you're one of the biggest opposite of that, is ironic to say the least.
    • Aaron Judge whined about it so I’m a fan.  The older I get, the more I think people just exist to look for confirmation biases. In all avenues of life. Paul Simon wrote “a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.” I’m sure if we beat the Royals and advanced and Walltimore robbed three or four homers from the Royals, we’d be extolling its virtues and how great it is.    But that didn’t happen. If anything, there were a couple instances where, if anything, it worked against us.    So here we are. 
    • I mean I wouldn’t be concerned about her opinions on which FA to sign or which players are best. But, she’s definitely a big fan and is just passing off info given to her. If it didn’t track into some other things that make sense, I wouldn’t pay it much mind. Of course, someone with an agenda could’ve just told her those things to spread rumors. Maybe Rick Dempsey haha.  
    • Do you think any team is too stupid to account for home park dimensions when evaluating pitchers?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...