Jump to content

The "other side" to how AM handled this offseason


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

YOU did.

You said that it isn't worth waiting into the season, even if we would get more.

Therefore, we would be getting less by trading now, under that scenario.

You don't know you will get more at this point.

Read what MM asked.

He said if that is what happened, would I complain.

Obviously that would be great but it is unlikely that will be the case...Possible? Yes...Likely? No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And the moves were there to be made.

I bet if AM traded BRob and Payton for Gallagher, Ceda, EPat, Veal and Cedeno, you would be the first one applauding him and saying how great he is.

1) That wasn't offered, as far as anyone outside either front office knows.

2) That would be a good deal.

3) That would go a long way to making your whole argument incorrect, so I don't know why you are attempting to use it as a defense, outside a clumsy attempt at a personal attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What dream is there? Cintron is available now, Vargas is available now. You can't tell me that those guys aren't better than Fahey/Hernandez or Trachsel, yet we refuse to upgrade? Why?

I completely agree with this. LH should not be our starting SS, and Trachsel should retire, but DT loves him, so I think AM did that as a favor to his manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SG, I agree with most of what you're saying. Millar I think should be gone, and if not now, then definitely by the All-Star Break. Similar for Payton, especially since he was rumored in the BRob deals. But do we really know what exactly was being offered for Brob and Payton? Through all these discussions do we really know what exactly was offered for BRob? I might be inclined to hold out since he is under contract for two more years and try again at the All Star Break. However, besides BRob, the rest of the guys being discussed will return less than what they probably would garner at the AS break, when a competing team might be looking for a replacement for an injured guy down the stretch. At least that's what I'm hoping.

In any event, trading all these names besides Roberts really isn't THAT important to the rebuild other than that they are taking away possible roster sports to Moore among others. In the end, I'm not losing any sleep over the lack of movement b/c these guys will get a chance to play once the vets are moved, which will happen. It has to.

Well, the idea of taking away roster spots is important, don't you think?

We could get a guy like Murton and have him and Scott split time at DH and LF..Maybe even some first base.

Adding a cheap, young player to give us an 800-840 OPS for 400 at bats is pretty valuable to a team that lacks positional talent but we really have no where to play him now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What dream is there? Cintron is available now, Vargas is available now. You can't tell me that those guys aren't better than Fahey/Hernandez or Trachsel, yet we refuse to upgrade? Why?

Because they aren't upgrades.

Hell, Vargas especially could end up blocking better players more then Trachsel because as a reclamation project he would likely get more chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) That wasn't offered, as far as anyone outside either front office knows.
Well, the 4 for 1 seems to have been offered....Not a stretch to think the CUbs would have dealt EPat for Payton to get it done.
3) That would go a long way to making your whole argument incorrect, so I don't know why you are attempting to use it as a defense, outside a clumsy attempt at a personal attack.

Well, obviously I would be arguing this point if AM had done this. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the moves were there to be made.

I bet if AM traded BRob and Payton for Gallagher, Ceda, EPat, Veal and Cedeno, you would be the first one applauding him and saying how great he is.

Unless you can name these moves and back them up with creditable sources, then everything you are saying is just your usual bs speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they aren't upgrades.Hell, Vargas especially could end up blocking better players more then Trachsel because as a reclamation project he would likely get more chances.

LOL...Vargas is clearly an upgrade over Trax. To say otherwise is beyond foolish.

Cintron is also better than LH if his arm is healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the idea of taking away roster spots is important, don't you think?

We could get a guy like Murton and have him and Scott split time at DH and LF..Maybe even some first base.

Adding a cheap, young player to give us an 800-840 OPS for 400 at bats is pretty valuable to a team that lacks positional talent but we really have no where to play him now.

Not as important when guys still have options left and we are going to suck anyways. But having the flexibility to get a guy like Murton and have him produce would be very nice, but if he's so readily available now, wouldn't that most likely make him acquirable at a later date, maybe after we have moved some of the drudge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What dream is there? Cintron is available now, Vargas is available now. You can't tell me that those guys aren't better than Fahey/Hernandez or Trachsel, yet we refuse to upgrade. Why? Why can't we just release Gibbons? Why can't we eat 4 million of Payton's contract? We have 26 million saved from Tejada. It's not like this team is hurting in the money department. This team can be a whole lot better than it is now and much more enjoyable to watch, yet the Orioles are taking the lazy way out and using the perception that we are going to lose 100 games as an excuse to do just that.

This should prove all you AM lovers wrong and prove that he should have made more moves

Plently of trades could have happened. Like a smaller deal for Callaspo, we could have had him.

This probably doesnt fit in, but I would have gotten a new manager. I dont think DT fits well with this club, because he loves the vets to much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the idea of taking away roster spots is important, don't you think?

We could get a guy like Murton and have him and Scott split time at DH and LF..Maybe even some first base.

Adding a cheap, young player to give us an 800-840 OPS for 400 at bats is pretty valuable to a team that lacks positional talent but we really have no where to play him now.

And how are we getting rid of these other players?

Nobody wants Payton, nobody will touch Huff, Mora or Gibbons, and there hasn't exactly been a desire for Millar.

Not to mention that, despite your psychic abilities, you have no idea whether or not MacPhail has been trying to trade these guys, and found no deals worth making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as important when guys still have options left and we are going to suck anyways. But having the flexibility to get a guy like Murton and have him produce would be very nice, but if he's so readily available now, wouldn't that most likely make him acquirable at a later date, maybe after we have moved some of the drudge?

Not if another team gets him first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like we know the 4 for 1 for BRob.

We know that other teams are either looking to deal guys or have dealt guys for little in return.

This isn't anything being dreamed up...This is WHAT HAS HAPPENED!

The players in the Roberts trade have always been rumor and speculation. We don't know what was discussed and we certainly don't know if there was an "offer."

The simple fact is that we don't know the intricacies of how any deals go down. This is not to say the Orioles are right or wrong, just that you don't know the details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can give him anything less than an A+ when it comes to the Tejada and Bedard trades. Those were both great moves.

I also don't think you can give him anything less than an Incomplete at nicest and F at worst when it comes to getting rid of our dead weight. Its a bit ridiculous that we still have all of Mora, Huff, Gibbons, Millar, and Payton on the team. Of course the wildcard is wondering what market, if any, these guys had, but I'll never believe that we couldn't have shed at least one of these guys.

Bedard, Tejada, and Roberts were, by far, the most important thing of the offseason, and he handled those very well, IMO. Maybe he didn't move Roberts, but he certainly didn't turn down any "can't miss" packages for him.

The rest, he clearly gets an incomplete at best.

The big 3 were about 75% of the grade, and he gets a A from me on that front. The other 25% of the roster he gets an F, so probably about a B to B+ overall if you're keeping score.

I'm happy with what he's done on the whole for this offseason. Hopefully he can continue to get a good package for Roberts and also get rid of some of our other dead weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Great sequence in the 10th where Mateo singled, driving in Westburg, stole 2nd and went to 3rd on the overthrow.  Then Mateo scored on a wild pitch.  I've joined the Mateo fan club, at least as a utility player.  Having Mateo on base has to drive pitchers crazy.
    • As someone that was all for DFA’ing McKenna for Hicks last week, I really can’t fault him for tonight.   I’m impressed he stole the base. He sort of had to run there with two outs. He stole it. He just came off the bag. That happens.  The route may have not been the best because he was going to his left and as a RH thrower he was just trying to position himself to throw home. He doesn’t have Vlad Sr’s arm out there. That’s a .01% chance play there.  Our CF depth is pretty thin. I think the only way we DFA McKenna is if Hicks comes here. Kjerstad will be the one to go for Hays. Remember last August when at full strength/healthy Mullins, and only a 26 man roster, we rolled with a 4 man bench of McCann, Hicks, Mateo, Urias/Frazier/Westburg.  Oddly, we’re deep enough into the season, and CF depth is thin, that I’d say there’s a 50/50 shot McKenna doesn’t clear waivers. I don’t know we have the luxury of CF depth to DFA him w/o Hicks in the mix. 
    • I think they will DFA him. They already did it once. And the fact nobody claimed him means you’re probably right about not starting for other teams. 
    • I had fun watching the extra innings of this game. That was good TV. Thanks Craig for serving up the evening’s entertainment!
    • Additionally, you can hover over the user name you want to ignore and a box pops up. The last button on the right at the bottom is the ignore button, click that and check all three boxes and you're done. Source: I'm a professional ignorer.
    • We have threads asking for Kremer, Grayson, and Povich in the closer role. Can we acknowledge that Cano is the pretty obvious next man up if Kimbrel is removed at some point? I don’t really care about his 9th inning splits. He’s our best reliever and until he gets a chance and fails I’m going to assume that’s just noise and he’ll do the best job. Tonight makes nine straight appearances with either a Save or Hold. Overall he has held a lead 10 times in 11 chances, and the one miss was a bad outing but still nearly a SV if not for Gunnar’s walk-off throwing error. 
    • McKenna was finally beginning to grow on me after years of my derision. He's done a few good things offensively. But I think he wouldn't  start for another team in the American League. I would DFA him(they won't) and bring up Hays in LF, Cowser in CF for a while, and Santander in RF. I still think if they give Kjerstad enough at bats, and not just coming off the bench as a PH, he will hit and hit for power....I dont like him getting 4 at bats a week... I think he needs to play. Mullins needs to sit for a few games.He simply cant track the ball all of a sudden.Its almost hard to watch. Maybe he's hurting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...