Jump to content

A few impressions


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not saying that they're too similar, but O'Day has a K/9 of 11.49. :confused:

Thank you.

Orioles Bullpen by K/9

11.9 Givens

11.5 O'Day

10.9 Matusz - surprise

10.3 Brach

10.3 Britton

7.2 McFarland

4.6 Garcia

This is a strikeout bullpen. If Chaz Roe is added, he's at 9.1 K/9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you.

Orioles Bullpen by K/9

11.9 Givens

11.5 O'Day

10.9 Matusz - surprise

10.3 Brach

10.3 Britton

7.2 McFarland

4.6 Garcia

This is a strikeout bullpen. If Chaz Roe is added, he's at 9.1 K/9.

The strikeout ability of our bullpen is a well kept secret. Thanks for posting .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Parra, but that BABIP scares the Bejeezus out of me. I think he'll end up commanding $10M/year, and I can't justify that cost for the risk of him reverting to his 2014 form. If they do re-sign him, I'll understand. I'll also be very concerned that he'll pull a Steve Pearce/Nate McLouth on them.

To be clear, I think Parra is having a career year that won't be repeated. But he's only 28 and should have several solid years left in him. I think he can put up a .700 - .780 OPS and be an above average baserunner and solid defender. Slightly different skill set than Nick Markakis but making a similar overall contribution. And as I said, I like his fiery demeanor.

And by the way, I don't believe his defensive metrics. He looks solid to me in all respects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my favorite Orioles team that I can remember in a long time.

Really? I've found them to be relentlessly frustrating, with their terrible road record and gaping holes in their lineup for chunks of the season. Out of the last 4 seasons, this is probably my 3rd favorite, just ahead of another microcosm of mediocrity, the 2013 team. The 2015 team still merits an INCOMPLETE grade, though, so we'll see if they move up or down my list by October. Looking at last night's big win vs. the Mets, I'm not especially encouraged. It was great seeing them bounce back every time the Mets seemed to have the game in hand, but, as we've learned, living and dying by The Long Ball is not a prescription for post-season success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear, I think Parra is having a career year that won't be repeated. But he's only 28 and should have several solid years left in him. I think he can put up a .700 - .780 OPS and be an above average baserunner and solid defender. Slightly different skill set than Nick Markakis but making a similar overall contribution. And as I said, I like his fiery demeanor.

And by the way, I don't believe his defensive metrics. He looks solid to me in all respects.

Thing is - he's going to get paid - probably 12 mil a year or so - prices are going up. Even with this season, he's got a career OPS+ of 99 - that's not good for a corner OFer. And this season's stats have clearly been BABIP aided. Does it make sense to pay him what he's likely going to get? Well, with the lack of availability of good hitters, maybe it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is - he's going to get paid - probably 12 mil a year or so - prices are going up. Even with this season, he's got a career OPS+ of 99 - that's not good for a corner OFer. And this season's stats have clearly been BABIP aided. Does it make sense to pay him what he's likely going to get? Well, with the lack of availability of good hitters, maybe it does.

I would re-sign him to play RF for the next 4 years. I think at most he is an $11 million a year player. I would give him a 4 year 44 million dollar deal. I would take that bet that he will be between .750-.800 OPS over the course of the contract. I also think his defense outperforms the metrics. He seems to fit the clubhouse chemistry. He is a keeper.

Givens is the real deal. With he and Brach back next year I feel confident we can overcome the loss of O'Day.

Signing Davis would be huge for this organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is - he's going to get paid - probably 12 mil a year or so - prices are going up. Even with this season, he's got a career OPS+ of 99 - that's not good for a corner OFer. And this season's stats have clearly been BABIP aided. Does it make sense to pay him what he's likely going to get? Well, with the lack of availability of good hitters, maybe it does.

We're going to pay FA prices for at least two solid players this winter if we want to remain even remotely competitive. It's just a matter of how high-end we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was great seeing them bounce back every time the Mets seemed to have the game in hand, but, as we've learned, living and dying by The Long Ball is not a prescription for post-season success.

We are not going to ever play small ball. Ever. We play in Camden Yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not going to ever play small ball. Ever. We play in Camden Yards.

Which could be a big reason why we're still waiting for the first World Series game ever at OPACY. Even the powerful '96/'97 teams had some of the similar flaws as these 2010s teams, which you've pointed out so succinctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which could be a big reason why we're still waiting for the first World Series game ever at OPACY. Even the powerful '96/'97 teams had some of the similar flaws as these 2010s teams, which you've pointed out so succinctly.

May well be that we never will. It really is luck in the postseason. Power can win too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my favorite Orioles team that I can remember in a long time.

What a difference a few days make. The day after the deadline, and then the no-hitter, it was easy to find people who said that Duquette can take his treasonous butt to Toronto and somebody else can come in and try to fix this unholy mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which could be a big reason why we're still waiting for the first World Series game ever at OPACY. Even the powerful '96/'97 teams had some of the similar flaws as these 2010s teams, which you've pointed out so succinctly.

I'd love to see a list of World Series teams whose core philosophy was small ball. And another list of World Series teams that relied primarily on power. I think since 1920 the list would be at least 10:1 in favor of power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...