Jump to content

Offseason Rumors and Deals Around MLB


neveradoubt

Recommended Posts

Looks to me like Mets paid market rate. Cespedes wanted one more shot at a big long term deal (if he has a big full season for New York). Otherwise, he gets the three years everyone else seems open to and gets to stay with the Mets.
The $25 million average annual value of the deal ties Cespedes with Giancarlo Stanton and Josh Hamilton for the highest average annual value ever for an outfielder

http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/14629430/yoenis-cespedes-agrees-deal-new-york-mets

If "Best Ever" is your market.

Cespedes had been seeking a six-year deal in the $22 million annual range this winter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Barry Svrluga says it is a big disappointment.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp/2016/01/23/for-nationals-yoenis-cespedess-signing-with-mets-is-latest-loss-in-a-long-winter/

They had gone after Ben Zobrist and lost him to the Chicago Cubs. They had pursued Jason Heyward and lost him to that same team, perhaps now the best in the National League. They checked in on Justin Upton and thought about some starting pitchers. And here they were, with the city frozen, snow falling and Yoenis Cespedes deciding between them and none other than the New York Mets.

More than any other figure, Cespedes put the Nationals in their current predicament. His arrival in Queens at the trade deadline last summer completely altered the National League East race. Here, then, in January, he altered it again, taking less money over fewer years to remain with the Mets — securing the reigning National league champions’ position as the divisional favorite again, at the expense of their chief rivals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's such a Boras framing of the contract. You honestly think that would be the AAV if they were discounting for the decline years over a longer term. Come on, bruh.......

It's still massive. I guess it's better than a Votto, Pujols, Cano deal though. But we are talking outfields. SO the only real comp on this is Hamilton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's such a Boras framing of the contract. You honestly think that would be the AAV if they were discounting for the decline years over a longer term. Come on, bruh.......

The Nationals deal that he passed on was reportedly a 21 AAV. So yeah. The Orioles only offered 18 Million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Conforto is certainly going to get all of the AB's against RHP's in LF, one would assume. Granderson has played CF in the past but he's older now and that would require moving Cespedes or Conforto out of position as well. Seems pretty certain that Cespedes, at the very least, is going to play CF against all RHP's. Maybe Lagares plays CF against LHP's with Cespedes moving to LF. The De Aza signing looks like a complete waste of money at this point. I would think they'd be looking to move him and I'd assume he'd give his consent (as a FA signee) to go somewhere and get more playing time.

I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still massive. I guess it's better than a Votto, Pujols, Cano deal though. But we are talking outfields. SO the only real comp on this is Hamilton.

Talk you the FO guys in the warehouse and ask them what this valuation would look like on a six or seven year deal? I think they will show it to be market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pursuing Cespedes shows that the Nats’ public self-assessment had to be different than their internal self-assessment.

There is also the desire to deprive their greatest rival as well. It's like when the Yankees get better for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk you the FO guys in the warehouse and ask them what this valuation would look like on a six or seven year deal? I think they will show it to be market.

I agree. But no one even went six on him. So five is all we have to look at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. But no one even went six on him. So five is all we have to look at.

Stretch out this valuation to a five year deal, discount (slightly) for added long term security and decline year risk and I'm still very confident this is not some crazy expensive deal. And I would be shocked if it wasn't right around that $21MM/per you are now comparing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He may or may not work out for them. Shoot CD could

disappoint too.

Frankly, I wish we could've signed CD to a deal like this. Great deal for Mets. No LT comittment for a 30 Y.O. Perhaps the one piece that will push the Mets to the top of the NL East again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I wish we could've signed CD to a deal like this. Great deal for Mets. No LT comittment for a 30 Y.O. Perhaps the one piece that will push the Mets to the top of the NL East again.

Sure. Everyone would have signed Davis to this. Davis did not have the terribly depressed market that Cespedes was wearing for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure the O's would have signed him to that AAV with no deferred money. Doesn't seem like their style at all.

Different opinions then. To me, It would make sense for any team. Almost all the risk is out of that deal. Without the opt out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...