wildcard Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I am sure you guys will correct me if I am wrong but I have only found 4 position players that have signed contracts that will pay them 30m/yr or more. They are ARod, Miggy Cabrera, Mike Trout and Albert Pujols. That's it. Let's see what those guys had to do to get a team to pay them at that level. ARod signed with the Yankees at age 32 in 2008. His contract paid him over 30m in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. By the time he signed that contract he had been: 3 time MVP Hit at least 40 homer season 8 times. Led the league in homers 5 times Drive in at least 100 RBI 11 times Led the league in RBI twice Hit for over 1.000 OPS 6 times Hit for over .900 OPS 10 times Been an All-Star 11 times 3 times GG winner Miggy Cabrera has yet to make 30m/yr. But he signed a contract in 2014 at the age of 30 that will pay 30m for 2018-21 and 32m in 2022-23. At the time the contract was signed Miggy had: 2 time MVP Been a batting champ 3 times Led the league in OBP 3 times Led the league in slugging 2 times Led the league in OPS 2 times Had an OPS over 1.000 3 times Had an OPs over .900 8 times Been an All-Star 8 times Mike Trout has not yet made 30m per year. But he signed a contract in 2014 at age 22 that will pay him 33.25m in 2018-2020. At the time of the contract signing he had: Been 2nd in the MVP voting 2 times Won Rookie of the year at age 21 Hit over .320 2 times Had a .399 OBP or better twice Had over a .900 OPS twice Scored 100 run or more 2 twice Led the league in steals once Albert Pujols has not yet made 30m per year. His contract that he sign in 2011 at the age of 31 will pay him 30M in 2021. At the time of the signing he had: 3 times MVP Voted Rookie of the year Batting Champion 1 time League the league in slugging and OPS 3 times Led the league in OBP once Had over a .400 OBP 9 times Had over a 1.000 OPS 8 times Had over a .900 OPS 11 times 9 times All Star 2 time GG winner Manny Machado 4th in the MVP once Never hit .300 Never had a .900 OBP 2 time All Star Led the league in doubles once Never hit 40 homer Scored 100 runs once 2 times GG winner 1 times Platinum Glove winner Manny could grow into a 30m/yr guy but his resume is not there yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BohKnowsBmore Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 You have to consider league inflation. I doubt that Manny's deal will actually reach $30M AAV just because of purchased arbitration years and a potential for opt-outs, but I think it should easily compare with Stanton's contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 You have to consider league inflation. I doubt that Manny's deal will actually reach $30M AAV just because of purchased arbitration years and a potential for opt-outs, but I think it should easily compare with Stanton's contract. Trout, Harper, Manny, Stanton post opt-out...and many behind them to follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 You have to consider league inflation. I doubt that Manny's deal will actually reach $30M AAV just because of purchased arbitration years and a potential for opt-outs, but I think it should easily compare with Stanton's contract. Some of his years will pay that. And I don't think he extends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristotelian Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I agree to an extent. He has established his defense as elite level. He is not quite there offensively. His first three years the bat has been good but not great, ending up around .745 each year. Last year he took a clear step forward, OPSing 100 points higher than his previous average. Even so, he still has 100 points to go before he gets to Trout's established career average. That said, Stanton is a $30M player, never hit 40 HR, and plays terrible defense. I would take Manny over Stanton right now. 35 may be the new 40 with the strikezone and PED testing. Bump that OPS another 50 points, slide Manny to SS, and $30M is attainable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BohKnowsBmore Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Some of his years will pay that. And I don't think he extends. I bet several of the years will pay that. I am just guessing that it's something like 10 years $295M if it gets done, with escalating annual salaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I bet several of the years will pay that. I am just guessing that it's something like 10 years $295M if it gets done, with escalating annual salaries. I agree. He'll get tons more than Heyward did. Think the Stanton deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I agree that it's not a complete no-brainer that Manny will earn $30 mm in his FA years. Offensive and defensive contributions are not equal when it comes to compensation. But with the salary inflation we've seen in recent years, I do think he'll get that. He's worth more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShoelesJoe Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Some of his years will pay that. And I don't think he extends. If that's true then the smart move by the Orioles would be to trade Machado for as much as we can get, as soon as we can. It'll hurt for sure, but the team can't afford to let him walk and only get a draft pick as compensation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babypowder Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I agree to an extent. He has established his defense as elite level. He is not quite there offensively. His first three years the bat has been good but not great, ending up around .745 each year. Last year he took a clear step forward, OPSing 100 points higher than his previous average. Even so, he still has 100 points to go before he gets to Trout's established career average. That said, Stanton is a $30M player, never hit 40 HR, and plays terrible defense. I would take Manny over Stanton right now. 35 may be the new 40 with the strikezone and PED testing. Bump that OPS another 50 points, slide Manny to SS, and $30M is attainable. Stanton plays a less demanding defensive position, but he plays it pretty well according to both DRS and UZR/150. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcard Posted December 28, 2015 Author Share Posted December 28, 2015 Giancarlo Stanton has not made 30m/yr yet. He signed a contract in 2014 at age 25 that will pay him 32m/yr in 2023, 2024, and 2025. Before he signed the contract he had: Been voted 2nd in the MVP once Led the league in homers once Led the league in slugging 2 times Have two years with an OPS of over .900 He has achieved more offensively than Manny so far. I think a lot depends on how the league looks at Manny's two surgically repaired knees. Both of Manny's knee surgeries were more extensive than Stanton's one knee surgery to remove bone chips. It may be harder for teams to commit to a 10 year contract with Manny. However, I do see the point that is being made. With a year of offense at the .900 OPS level Manny could reach Stanton level when Manny's defense is considered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcard Posted December 28, 2015 Author Share Posted December 28, 2015 Josh Hamilton Hamilton will make 30m/yr in 2016-17. He signed that contract in 2012 at the the age of 31. At that point he had: Been the MVP 1 time Been a batting champion once Led the league in slugging, RBI and OPS once Had over 100 RBI 3 times Had over 1.000 OPS once Had over .900 OPS 4 times Been an All Star 5 times However his known addictions at the time for the signing were probably as detrimental to his ability to stay on the field as Manny's knee surgeries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Giancarlo Stanton has not made 30m/yr yet. He signed a contract in 2014 at age 25 that will pay him 32m/yr in 2023, 2024, and 2025. Before he signed the contract he had:Been voted 2nd in the MVP once Led the league in homers once Led the league in slugging 2 times Have two years with an OPS of over .900 He has achieved more offensively than Manny so far. I think a lot depends on how the league looks at Manny's two surgically repaired knees. Both of Manny's knee surgeries were more extensive than Stanton's one knee surgery to remove bone chips. It may be harder for teams to commit to a 10 year contract with Manny. However, I do see the point that is being made. With a year of offense at the .900 OPS level Manny could reach Stanton level when Manny's defense is considered. Stanton, face shattered by fastball, hamate removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Here are the biggest long-term deals for 3B: David Wright -- top salary $20 mm Kyle Seager -- top salary $19.5 mm Evan Longoria -- top salary $19.5 mm Ryan Zimmerman -- top salary $18 mm Adrian Beltre -- top salary $17 mm Even considering Manny's age, defensive prowess and inflation, is he really going to make >50% more per season than these guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 Here are the biggest long-term deals for 3B:David Wright -- top salary $20 mm Kyle Seager -- top salary $19.5 mm Evan Longoria -- top salary $19.5 mm Ryan Zimmerman -- top salary $18 mm Adrian Beltre -- top salary $17 mm Even considering Manny's age, defensive prowess and inflation, is he really going to make >50% more per season than these guys? As an extension? No. As a free agent at 26? Yes. If he is a 35 HR hitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.