Jump to content

Latos to White Sox


TheBee

Recommended Posts

And Fister, but don't criticize DD, he is all knowing and powerful.

He would rather trade away from a baron system and give away first round draft picks.

Frustrating.

What is that that you normally tell me about not making posts such that it is "us vs them." No one says that so stop spewing lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

3 million - 1 year

Good bargain, imo.

Only 3 million? Must be hurt still.

It just seems the FO wasn't in on him. Wonder why?

He may or may not be hurt.

But my feeling/reaction about this is that it's kind of like reading a big story a newspaper, but it doesn't make sense ...... something seems to be missing (about the story.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's the supposed character issues that I guess are worth throwing out there. Maybe Buck wasn't down?

Me personally, I just think the O's had their own plan and guys like Latos and Fister never really factored in too much.

At this point, unless it is a Milb deal, there are 40 man roster issues to discuss at length. And you can't DL anyone yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. You have to be willing to give up a healthy player who you know for a potentially unhealthy one who you do not know. Unless you're very sure of the player you're getting, that's a tough call to make.

After camp opens you can put Bundy on a 60 day DL if you want. Probably Harvey too. Maybe even Hardy. But you can't yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is something we can be sure of: some pitcher who was signed very cheaply will have a very good year, and there will be posters criticizing our front office for not signing that pitcher. Maybe it will be Latos, maybe Fister, maybe some other guy.

All I can say about Latos is that there must be some very serious question marks about his health. You don't get marked down to $3 mm because people don't like your clubhouse demeanor. Nor do you get marked down that far because you present some moderate medical risk, like Fister. This is what you pay for a guy who has less than a 50% chance of being healthy this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • But again, nothing you say here changes anything. This team is going to be built from within. They are not going to try to build any other way…and they are right about that. This doesn’t mean they don’t need to spend but again, those guys will supplement the roster. And don’t think they won’t talk about how they added guys at the deadline for 2025. That they are “like free agent signings”.
    • It was the holder, not the kicker.  Jackson may not be perfect, but he's far from the problem this year. He's got a fumbling issue that may at some point cost this team a game or two, but there is no doubt he's playing some good football right now.
    • Yeah I'm surprised that Cleveland has been this bad. They were good last season. 
    • Gunnar also signed a one year contract.
    • The when is really two questions.  One is when do the O's stop being handicapped by the risk-averse mindset that's governed their behavior since 2018, and the second is when does a 74 year-old billionaire tire of being told he has to wait a little longer because Jackson Holliday needs to further refine his new toe-tap?  Oh, and we also need to nail down a position for Coby Mayo, and so on.  No question?  I think the questions are numerous and many of them pretty important, and because they're so important, I think we'll start seeing a change in approach beginning this offseason.  I certainly hope so. Nothing I've said disputes the need for internal development or diminishes the role our current core of young players - some of whom haven't exactly made a seamless transition - will need to play for sustained success.  Nor is it a call for stupid FA spending.  It very much is an argument that time needs to be thought of differently now that two very successful regular seasons are behind the O's and the huge impediment of Angelos ownership is no longer a factor.
    • If he wants to join Hyde’s staff in some capacity, I’d be fine with that. Or are you actually talking about him being on the team as a player?
    • So why would you have sought payment if you were owner as you previously stated?  Since you are not known for being litigious and all? Also as I am sure you’re already aware the media exclusivity rights in Vegas are already shared by 6 major league teams. Which clearly was not the situation in DC as the territory was expressly the territory of the Baltimore Orioles.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...