Jump to content

Turning point of the spring for the O's.


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Not everyone, but some folks would.

Everyone has a right to be whatever kind of fan they want to be, pessimist, optimist, fair weather(the worst), casual, bad wagon. I'm a realist. And just because a player puts on my team's uniform, doesn't mean I like him. When Albert Belle put on the Orioles uniform, it was horrible. I couldn't root for him. Almost the same with Bonilla. Couldn't stand the sight of him. Doesn't make me less of a fan.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone has a right to be whatever kind of fan they want to be, pessimist, optimist, fair weather(the worst), casual, bad wagon. I'm a realist. And just because a player puts on my team's uniform, doesn't mean I like him. When Albert Belle put on the Orioles uniform, it was horrible. I couldn't root for him. Almost the same with Bonilla. Couldn't stand the sight of him. Doesn't make me less of a fan.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There are no realists. Just folks who view reality differently. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they were winning, we'd all be: "winning early is important, it establishes the 'can-win' attitude"

When ST doesn't go our way it's all about " young players getting their feet wet, pitchers just warming up and not showing their real stuff and just working out 3rd and 4th pitches and new stuff. Hitters are just trying to make contact..."

If we go 10-2 the first 2 weeks of the season we are all: Great starts mean great ending"

If we go 2-10 the first 2 weeks, we are all " it's a]early, wait till the weather and bats heat up"

Baseball fans find any reason to be optimists or pessimists, irrationally and subjectively. Orioles fans are notorious for this. We'll make excuses for losing and turn utility players into HOFers.

Not everyone, but some folks would.

Some folks would, but most would not.

In fact, some folks would be concerned that we would be winning a ton of games that don't count, and be wary of them being able to put that winning to use in the games that do count.

I myself would be very modestly encouraged if the Orioles were winning, but would not be making that correlation/attachment to the regular season games. At most, I would make a correlation of individual players playing well (in particular, the starting pitchers) in the final 2 weeks of Spring Training and their ability to continue that when the real games started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone has a right to be whatever kind of fan they want to be, pessimist, optimist, fair weather(the worst), casual, bad wagon. I'm a realist. And just because a player puts on my team's uniform, doesn't mean I like him. When Albert Belle put on the Orioles uniform, it was horrible. I couldn't root for him. Almost the same with Bonilla. Couldn't stand the sight of him. Doesn't make me less of a fan.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I do. Anytime a player puts on the black and orange I'll cheer for him. As for

Belle it wasn't his fault that he had a degenerative hip condition. I cheered my ass

for him just like the other players. Doesn't matter who the players are. They are

O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baseball fans find any reason to be optimists or pessimists, irrationally and subjectively. Orioles fans are notorious for this. We'll make excuses for losing and turn utility players into HOFers.

Agreed. Well said.

Btw, Oct. 1 is Flaherty statue day. Bring the kids.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Well said.

Btw, Oct. 1 is Flaherty statue day. Bring the kids.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Flaherty has to wait until Kiko Garcia and Felix Pie get their monuments.

And Tx, I didn't hate Belle because of his hip, I hated him when he was with the Indians and was a despicable human being. ARod, Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens were Apostles compared to Belle. I'll take production over character, usually, but Belle failed that test, too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone has a right to be whatever kind of fan they want to be, pessimist, optimist, fair weather(the worst), casual, bad wagon. I'm a tealist.

I support your right to be any kind of fan you want to be. As to who is a realist, that is in the eyes of the beholder. To me, a true realist is one who realizes that baseball seasons are pretty unpredictable and that much will be decided by unexpected pleasant surprises, disappointments and injuries. Anyon who expresses a great degree of certainty about how a season will play out is not a realist, IMO. I'm not singling you out here, just making a general statement.

I consider myself an optimistic realist. But perhaps I'm more of a realistic optimist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And today we lose to a SS Phillies team, with about 1/2 of our regulars in the lineup and dominated by Phillies farmhands.

No way that a nine game losing streak isn't an indicator of the state of the team

At the very least we can see that our high level prospects are inferior, which I think most realize

and it's not just losing it's getting blown out of almost every game this spring

This team can't get on base, can't run the bases, can't catch a fly ball, and can't put pressure on the other teams defense because of what I expect will be the lowest number of balls in play

in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they were winning, we'd all be: "winning early is important, it establishes the 'can-win' attitude"

When ST doesn't go our way it's all about " young players getting their feet wet, pitchers just warming up and not showing their real stuff and just working out 3rd and 4th pitches and new stuff. Hitters are just trying to make contact..."

If we go 10-2 the first 2 weeks of the season we are all: Great starts mean great ending"

If we go 2-10 the first 2 weeks, we are all " it's a]early, wait till the weather and bats heat up"

Baseball fans find any reason to be optimists or pessimists, irrationally and subjectively. Orioles fans are notorious for this. We'll make excuses for losing and turn utility players into HOFers.

Some folks would be carving up the Blue Jays, Yankees or Red Sox if they started 0-9-1 in spring training.

With the Blue Jays, the narrative would be it's a dysfunctional clubhouse and this is bound to carry over into the regular season.

With the Yankees, the narrative would be players are showing their age and the regular season hasn't even started yet. They're toast.

With the Red Sox, the narrative would be overhyped team with some bloated contracts and suspect starting pitching that will find its way into the cellar once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they can and will improve over the course of the season, but there's little doubt that they have played rather poorly in the first 10 games of the season, as a team.

I just hope that by the last week of spring training they'll start getting it into their heads that it's important to win games instead of just feeling like they're out there to have fun and get some good swings in. A team without a passion to win ends up sub-.500 for the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they can and will improve over the course of the season, but there's little doubt that they have played rather poorly in the first 10 games of the season, as a team.

I just hope that by the last week of spring training they'll start getting it into their heads that it's important to win games instead of just feeling like they're out there to have fun and get some good swings in. A team without a passion to win ends up sub-.500 for the season.

I would have thought that a team that had gone from 96 wins to 81 wins would already have plenty of passion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...