Jump to content

Could Lincecum still be an option for us, and should he be?


xian4

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He wants a major league deal, and with Bundy and Rule 5 already just about guaranteed roster spots, it's a tough fit.

Disagree. Considering our vacant 5th starter spot neither of those guys really affect this move. Only question is, can Worley start in the minors?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree. Considering our vacant 5th starter spot neither of those guys really affect this move. Only question is, can Worley start in the minors?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Worley can't go to the minors. He's a grown man. That's how we got him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worley can't go to the minors. He's a grown man. That's how we got him.

Ah. For some reason I thought he had been signed on an MiL deal or something like that. My bad.

Point stands though. Tim L definitely isn't impacted by the team keeping rickard.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah. For some reason I thought he had been signed on an MiL deal or something like that. My bad.

Point stands though. Tim L definitely isn't impacted by the team keeping rickard.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Point stands. Absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As I just said on <a href="https://twitter.com/MLBNetwork">@MLBNetwork</a>, 20 teams, including <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SFGiants?src=hash">#SFGiants</a>, reached out on lincecum. Padres, marlins, O's big interest</p>— Jon Heyman (@JonHeyman) <a href="

">February 19, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...