Jump to content

Are you in favor of the Pearce for Heim deal?


Frobby

Are you in favor of the Pearce for Heim trade?  

151 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you in favor of the Pearce for Heim trade?

    • Yes. Pearce can help us.
    • No. Too much to give up for a rental who will play part time.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This trade seems like a payback for when we gave the Rays Chad Bradford for nothing down the stretch a few years ago. If we were on the other side of this trade we'd be banging our heads against the wall.

I remember when that happened, and I was actually glad about it ...... that's how much I hate the Yankees and the Red Sox.

P.S. At that time (2008), the Orioles's farm system was getting better, and would continue to get better in 2009 and 2010.

At that time (2008), I knew that the Orioles were at least 2 years away from being a contender (it wound up being 4 years), and although Bradford was our best relief pitcher at the time, he was a 32 year-old veteran who was not going to be part of the Orioles' return to respectability in 2010, 2011, 2012, and beyond.

So giving the D-Rays a player that might help them stave off the Yankees and the Red Sox for the division title (they did), and who also might help them beat them should they meet head-on in the playoffs (they did, with the D-Rays beating the Red Sox in that year's ALCS) was something that I liked. If they had given up somebody like Wieters, Reimold, Tillman, Bergesen, Matusz, etc. that had a good chance to be a part of the Orioles' future, then I would not have liked it at all. Giving them a veteran pitcher who was in the twilight of his career was considerably different than that, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This trade seems like a payback for when we gave the Rays Chad Bradford for nothing down the stretch a few years ago. If we were on the other side of this trade we'd be banging our heads against the wall.

Billy Beane still owes us a solid for Pat Neshek. Maybe he will send us Coulombe for cash...or a few MASN shares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Pearce, and I'm not upset about Heim going to TB. So why vote NO?

Just another outfielder to muddy up the lineup. If they wanted a backup player for the bench, I would have preferred a player who could steal a base, or come in and move the runners over with a good contact AB.. or bunt. OH WAIT.. wrong team!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Pearce, and I'm not upset about Heim going to TB. So why vote NO?

Just another outfielder to muddy up the lineup. If they wanted a backup player for the bench, I would have preferred a player who could steal a base, or come in and move the runners over with a good contact AB.. or bunt. OH WAIT.. wrong team!

?

Pearce is hitting .310 this year with an obp of like .390. He gets on base and can serve as great depth while splitting with kim and giving otheers a day off if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got back from vacation. Just got the great news that Steve Pearce is back with the team he belongs with. Welcome back! Let's sign him so that he never leaves again.

Id like if we did this offseason. Such good depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heim seems like a guy who ultimately ends up as a backup-backup catcher. And that's after he simmers on the farm for a few more years.

Pearce fills an obvious and immediate need for a team that's in the playoff hunt at the trade deadline.

Hard for me to see how this poll isn't 100% positive on the move... (0_o)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not like Pearce last year. This year he is back to being a four win type player.

He's been a 2-win player in 60 games. But his career rate is 2.1 wins per 500 PAs, so he's probably going to be worth half a win over the 30-odd games he'll play from here on out. You can't just take a niche player whose playing time and role has been set up for him to succeed and extrapolate that over a full season.

Brother Lo wasn't a 7-8 win player in '82 because he was a 4-win player in 380 PAs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been a 2-win player in 60 games. But his career rate is 2.1 wins per 500 PAs, so he's probably going to be worth half a win over the 30-odd games he'll play from here on out. You can't just take a niche player whose playing time and role has been set up for him to succeed and extrapolate that over a full season.

Brother Lo wasn't a 7-8 win player in '82 because he was a 4-win player in 380 PAs.

IMO, Pearce is a professional blue collar fan that fits in well this clubhouse and respected by Buck.

He isn't going to carry this team, or expected to, but like Flaherty, he will have a bench role/limited playing time that will help the team.

Again, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.S. At that time (2008), the Orioles's farm system was getting better, and would continue to get better in 2009 and 2010.

At that time (2008), I knew that the Orioles were at least 2 years away from being a contender (it wound up being 4 years), and although Bradford was our best relief pitcher at the time, he was a 32 year-old veteran who was not going to be part of the Orioles' return to respectability in 2010, 2011, 2012, and beyond.

So giving the D-Rays a player that might help them stave off the Yankees and the Red Sox for the division title (they did), and who also might help them beat them should they meet head-on in the playoffs (they did, with the D-Rays beating the Red Sox in that year's ALCS) was something that I liked. If they had given up somebody like Wieters, Reimold, Tillman, Bergesen, Matusz, etc. that had a good chance to be a part of the Orioles' future, then I would not have liked it at all. Giving them a veteran pitcher who was in the twilight of his career was considerably different than that, though.

You knew it huh :scratchchinhmm: So after 11 losing seasons you knew and predicted the O's to win ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.S. At that time (2008), the Orioles's farm system was getting better, and would continue to get better in 2009 and 2010.

At that time (2008), I knew that the Orioles were at least 2 years away from being a contender (it wound up being 4 years), and although Bradford was our best relief pitcher at the time, he was a 32 year-old veteran who was not going to be part of the Orioles' return to respectability in 2010, 2011, 2012, and beyond.

So giving the D-Rays a player that might help them stave off the Yankees and the Red Sox for the division title (they did), and who also might help them beat them should they meet head-on in the playoffs (they did, with the D-Rays beating the Red Sox in that year's ALCS) was something that I liked. If they had given up somebody like Wieters, Reimold, Tillman, Bergesen, Matusz, etc. that had a good chance to be a part of the Orioles' future, then I would not have liked it at all. Giving them a veteran pitcher who was in the twilight of his career was considerably different than that, though.

You knew it huh :scratchchinhmm: So after 11 losing seasons you knew and predicted the O's to win ok.

Actually, I was indeed anticipating the Orioles' turnaround it as far back as 2008.

I was not posting here at the time, but I was posting at the Baltimore Sun, and expressing the reasons for my optimism ...... partially because of the players that the Orioles had in the highest level of the minors, and partially because of Andy MacPhail having been hired on as the Orioles' G.M. the previous season.

Prior to the 2009 season, I expected the Orioles to have a competitive, winning season in 2010, and to contend for a pennant in 2011. The Orioles did it all in one shot in 2012, so I was off by 2 years on the winning season, and I was off by one year on the Orioles contending for a pennant. In fact, when I called Nestor Aparicio at his sports radio show the time (before I knew what a jerk he was), he thought that I was crazy.

And I had previously referenced one of the reasons why I thought so in a thread that I started in June of 2012, which alluded to my thinking in late 2008, and early 2009.

OFFNY's Original Big Ten from 2009

.

A few years ago, I had a list of 10 starting pitching prospects that were playing in the Orioles' minor league system at the level of at least Advanced-A or higher that were either highly (or at least fairly highly) touted at that time. Some of them are still with the team, some have been traded, and some are still in our minor league system.

My feeling at that time was that the numbers alone were in our favor. I thought that out of those 10 pitchers that were high-level (or at least fairly high-level) prospects, we should be able to get at least 3 or 4 starting pitchers that would have pretty good (or better) major league careers. I wasn't sure which of the 3 or 4 would make it and be live up to those expectations because sometimes the "can't miss" prospects miss, and sometimes the "middle-tier" prospects surprise and pitch like that of the "can't miss" prospect. And of course, sometimes they bomb out. :o

Anyway, it's a few years later, so I figured that I would throw the topic of where these players are now, and where they might be in 2013 and beyond out there for discussion. :)

OFFNY's 2009 Big Ten

1. Brad Bergesen

2. Jason Berken

3. Chris Tillman

4. David Hernandez ........ These were the 4 "AA Boys" at that time that anchored an excellent staff at AA-Bowie the previous season (2008). Between the 4 of them, they racked up 48 wins and 5 complete games with 3 shutouts in the 5-month season that year.

5. Brandon Erbe

6. Chorye Spoone

7. Brian Matusz

8. Jake Arrieta

9. Zach Britton

10. Troy Patton

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/122486-OFFNY-s-Original-Big-Ten-from-2009

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
    • picks If a team that loses a qualifying free agent is a revenue-sharing recipient and the free agent signs for at least $50 million, the team will be awarded a pick between the first round and Competitive Balance Round A.   Minnesota Twins Compensation for Sonny Gray. The Cardinals forfeited their second-round pick for signing Gray.
    • The answer appears to be, yes, you can receive more than one compensation picks. Angels -- Shohei Ohtani: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Blue Jays -- Matt Chapman: Pick after Round 4 Cubs -- Cody Bellinger: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Padres -- Blake Snell: Pick after Round 4 Padres -- Josh Hader: Pick after Round 4
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...