Jump to content

The window is a myth


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I am not saying the Red Sox don't have a good team and a good farm system.   The Jays are very competitive with the O's. The Yanks have a long way to go but are building.  All this post in meant to do is say that the window that is much talked about is something the O's can deal with.   With key moves that we can all discuss that O's have a path forward to be a competitive team past 2018.  

If you have great insight into the other teams go ahead and add it to the discussion.

The Yanks do not have a long way to go.  They have a slammin' farm system and should be under the luxury tax threshold which will allow them to fill any holes with the projected ridiculousness of the 2018 FA class.

I expect them to be a very good team in two years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, wildcard said:

If the O's can maintain a 160m payroll, (and it appears they can) then they can keep enough core players to continue their 5 years of success in the AL East into the future.  There are three essential contracts that need to happen make the window go away.  1) extend Buck, 2) extend Dan, and  sign Manny.   All need to happen his coming off season.  All three look doable.

Yes, even a 10/300 Manny's extension is doable.  That is mainly because Dan continues to churn the roster.  Let some high salaried players go.  Find good players in  what is thought to be a poor farm system while making use of the Rule 5 draft and smart, cheap acquisitions.  This all happens because the network that Buck and Dan have built.  The know people throughout baseball.  They seek advice.  Find value in players that others let go. 

The O's may have 50m coming off the book this fall:

Jimenez 13.5m

Britton  11.5m

Miley 8.75

Smith 7m

Castillo 6m

Kim  4.2m

Total Gone - 50.95m

Certain things have to happen to allow these players to go and not hurt the O's.  1) They have to find two starters out of Ynoa, Aquino and Lee,   2) Mancini and Rickard needs to show he can take over corner outfield spots,   3) Sisco needs to show he is ready to be a front line catcher.  All those things are in the realm of possibility and Buck and Dan will be trying to make them happen with development of young players this year.   I expect all these players will see time in the majors this year to prepare them for their roles next year.

Britton will need to be traded this off season.  He is gone after 2018 anyway.  With Boras as his agent he is going through the free agent process.  He will be unaffordable for the O's.  Chapman got 5/86m.   The O''s are not going there.  Not with Brach, O'Day, Givens, Hart, Nuno, Liranzo in  the organization.  Brach should be able to be extended pretty reasonably.  3/21m or so.  They need to trade Britton to get a decent return.  A good, young 3B would help so they can move Manny to SS in the future.

Castillo can opt to stay and the O's have the money to keep him.  But he could opt out and go for bigger contract.  I think this season will be a great opportunity for him to leverage himself for a future contract.

Why do I think the O's can afford Manny?  Just look at next years payroll:

1) Davis 23m - 1B

2) Manny  20m - 3B  10/300m with a 5 year opt out

3) Jones 17m - CF Extend for 3 years at 17 per

4) Tillman 17m  - SP1 - extend 3/51m plus a invest option

5)  Trumbo -12.5m -DH

6) O'Day 9m - RP1

7) Schoop 8m - 2B

8) Hardy 7m - SS - Let go FA and resign 1/7m

9) Gausman 6m - SP2

10) Brach 5m - RP2 extend  3/21

11) Flaherty  2m - UIF resign

12) Gentry 2m -OF resign

13) Nuno 2m - RP3 

14) Bundy 1.8m - SP3

15) Joseph 1m -BC

16) Rickard .5m - LF

17) Givens .5m - RP4

18) Hart .5m - RP5

19) Ynoa .5m - SP4

20) Sisco .5m - C

21) Aquino .5m  - SP5

22) Wilson .5m - RP6

23) Liranzo .5m - RP7

24) Mullins .5m - OF

25) Mancini .5m -RF

Total 2018 Payroll 138.3M

138m gives the O's about 20m to cover any holes that occur.  And when Manny's salary goes to 30m there is still room with the way Dan works a roster.   I am not worried about the window.  It seems to me that the O's can afford Manny.  And if that is true with Gausman and Bundy stepping up there is no reason should not be able to continue there winning ways. 

 

 

I hope all that happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I am not  asking you to comment an further if you don't want to but the window is a big issue that hangs over the O's future.  It has been much talked about.   I think its appropriate to address it when a scenario can be made that it is not really an issue.

I think it is not a foregone conclusion that our window will close.     Things will be a lot clearer at the end of this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair to the OP, he traded Britton and didn't list players coming back for him. I would expect a SP and OF to at least come back in that deal. Plus no mention of Santander. These are potentially 3-4 more guys/prospects that could be contributors at the league min for a long time. 

Window extenders:

Rickard

Mancini

Sisco

Santander

Harvey, Sedlock

Liranzo, Scott, Chichton

Any of the depth SPs in AAA

Prospects

Let's face it, we are going to have to be more top heavy than a Baywatch Pam Anderson.  So we need these window extenders to produce and be cheap. There is hope. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have come to the realization that so long as the nationals are in the DMV and a contending team, the Angelos family will do whatever it takes to remain competitive. 

The Nats move is a double edged sword. It shrunk the orioles reach and geographical market but it has also made Angelos stay on his toes in terms of putting a competitive, quality product on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree to some extent. Re-signing Manny by itself could keep the O's competitive for a long time. The biggest near term needs I don't see addressed anywhere are OF and SS/3B. Even if we sign Manny, JJ cannot last forever. He seems to be on his last legs already. There is no prospect in sight to take his place or to play 3B if Manny shifts to SS. OF is very weak as well. Rickard and Mullins have promise but we don't have anyone with superstar ceilings like Betts, Pederson, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suataining the window is entirely dependent on sustaining a minor league pipeline.  Dan is right when he says the Orioles farm system has been underrated.  The Orioles dont compete over the last 5 years if its really barren.  But thats got to keep rolling and the mistake contracts (Jimenez) and the mistake trades (Hader) have to be minimalized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I agree to some extent. Re-signing Manny by itself could keep the O's competitive for a long time. The biggest near term needs I don't see addressed anywhere are OF and SS/3B. Even if we sign Manny, JJ cannot last forever. He seems to be on his last legs already. There is no prospect in sight to take his place or to play 3B if Manny shifts to SS. OF is very weak as well. Rickard and Mullins have promise but we don't have anyone with superstar ceilings like Betts, Pederson, etc.

Manny is no Trout and look where the Angels are.

It takes more than one guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think it is not a foregone conclusion that our window will close.     Things will be a lot clearer at the end of this year.  

Sure.  But I have not seen a scenario like this posted.  Thought is was worthy of discusion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I agree to some extent. Re-signing Manny by itself could keep the O's competitive for a long time. The biggest near term needs I don't see addressed anywhere are OF and SS/3B. Even if we sign Manny, JJ cannot last forever. He seems to be on his last legs already. There is no prospect in sight to take his place or to play 3B if Manny shifts to SS. OF is very weak as well. Rickard and Mullins have promise but we don't have anyone with superstar ceilings like Betts, Pederson, etc.

I put in the OP that a young 3B would be good to get back for Britton. I hope they look for another young starter as well in the deal.

We will have to see how Rickard and Mancini develop this year in the outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, backwardsk said:

Slight nitpick, but Schoop at $8M seems high after making 3.7 this year.

And by the way, our window closed after 2015.  ?

So you are saying I projected the 2018 payroll too high.  I like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...