Jump to content

vs. TIGERS, 5/17


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 309
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, HokieOs said:

Sure he can. That said, I think the quick recoil makes the bat look like it went even further than it did. 

And the fact is that the first check swing looked like he went too.

Wow, I'm not sure how ANYONE could think that first check swing looked like he went.  Even CB could see that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HokieOs said:

And yes, I'm aware that front of the plate is not the general rule and it's up to the discretion of the ump. But I don't see the dispute here. Looked like he went to me.

What? It's a swing that's in a range that gets called either way and a type of call that has no hard and fast rule.  It is inherently disputable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Wow, I'm not sure how ANYONE could think that first check swing looked like he went.  Even CB could see that.  

Touche. But what that also means that if what the ump says goes, then there's nothing to dispute, it's up to him to make the call. But I think most umps make the same call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HokieOs said:

Touche. But what that also means that if what the ump says goes, then there's nothing to dispute, it's up to him to make the call. But I think most umps make the same call.

I respectfully disagree. Is your last name Bucknor by chance?

That is definitely not a call that "most umps" would make. I'd actually say that's a strike maybe 5% of the time at most.

The timing was also the worst. CB inserted himself into the game at its most critical moment. With a call of such importance, you err on the side of caution. If the roles were reversed, I would think we just stole one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ChinMusic said:

I respectfully disagree. Is your last name Bucknor by chance?

That is definitely not a call that "most umps" would make. I'd actually say that's a strike maybe 5% of the time at most.

The timing was also the worst. CB inserted himself into the game at its most critical moment. With a call of such importance, you err on the side of caution. If the roles were reversed, I would think we just stole one.

He's worse than Bucknor.  At least CB could see that first check-swing wasn't a swing.  

And with all due respect to HokieO's, I think everyone who can tell the difference between a hockey puck and a baseball knows what the check-swing rule is.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw, here are some quotes from motownsports.com's game thread.

"CBBucknor late for his date. Tigers win"

"QUICK..............SNAP THE BALL BEFORE THEY CAN OVERTURN IT !!!!!!!!!!"

"Arguably the worst umpire in MLB steals the win for the good guys"

"Color me shocked, CB missed a call."

I think it's fair to say that when your opposing fans feel like they got away with one, that's probably exactly what happened. Not a single person in that game thread thought that was the correct call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ruzious said:

He's worse than Bucknor.  At least CB could see that first check-swing wasn't a swing.  

And with all due respect to HokieO's, I think everyone who can tell the difference between a hockey puck and a baseball knows what the check-swing rule is.  

 

I should probably just let this die, but his insistence on being wrong about something plain as day is really irking me at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

And they slowed it down and it wasn't close. Even Palmer said it was wrong. 

I love me some Palmer. He calls it like he sees it, and never pulls any punches. If he thought that was a bad call, I tend to agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Is that true? I don't think that it is. I think baseball and other sports are similar in this respect. I picked a random NHL player... literally the first one I stumbled on, Luc Robitalle. He played 19 years in the NHL. Had a peak goal scoring season of 63, and also had seasons of 23, 15, 11, 30. Heung-min Son is a poplar Premier League soccer player, a forward, for Tottenham Hotspur. In his nine years with the club he's scored totals including 4, 14, 12, 11, 23, and 10 goals. Wayne Rooney was a regular starter in the Premier League from 2002-2018 and had goals scored totals anywhere from six to 27, including consecutive years in his prime of 27, 11, 11, 26. In the space of eight years Wilt Chamberlain had season average scoring marks of anywhere from 24 to 50 points per game. In 1981 John Riggins played in 15 NFL games, rushed 194 times for 714 yards and 13 TDs. In 1983 he played in 15 games and rushed 375 times for 1347 yards and 24 touchdowns.
    • It's all good... and good reply. 
    • Mejdal was interviewed during the TV broadcast... maybe two weeks ago. He repeated his preference right at the end of the interview (IIRC, from the stands or field). 
    • I think we need to be careful about conflating BABIP and luck.  All batted balls are not created equal.  Not even all balls with the same EV and launch angle are equal.   
    • You said it works out less often. I agree that is what the historical data said in a study many years ago. It is a reason to be cautious. I would add that Gunnar is an exception as well. There are a long list of 17 year talents who do not develop. For me, it has more to do with which team drafts them, than age at graduation. Things are changing, I think. I read an article some months ago about development and it talked about the age factors of high school kids. It was in depth about age, confidence, physical maturation and all that. It talked about high level travel ball, year round development and training, and how modern data have helped evaluate the players. I believe it was the opinion of the author, so I suppose it is anecdotal.  Many talented kids are 19 at graduation, and Florida and Texas have it quite often. When they go to college, they become draft eligible sophomores. There are many examples of players in that demographic finding success. I have no idea where that article was, sorry. I read a lot about these kinds of things from many sources as a former youth coach and the parent of a 13 year old pitcher/player. I am sure someone will ask for a link. Take it for what it is. Not trying to be argumentative, or contrary. Just adding to the discussion, Greg. 
    • I’ll give it a think and see if I can convince Sig. 😉
    • You’re learning.   Just say really negative stuff about the guys who aren’t doing well.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...