Jump to content

What could you get for Brach?


Lucky_13

Recommended Posts

Everyone's talking about Britton but what could the return be for Brach? 

If we offer him to the Nats could you get something like OF Andrew Stevenson and Joe Ross?

That gives the Orioles a near MLB ready Outfielder who's a plus defender with  speed, gap power, and decent on base skills. Ross is a classic change of scenery guy. Orioles could plug him into the rotation this season and hope he figures it out. If not could be a so lid bullpen piece.

Just a thought and I could be overrating Brach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I know Ross hasn't been great this year, but he was good last year and has upside. He also is under control for 5.5 more years versus 1.5 years.

I try not to be too pessimistic about our inability to develop pitching prospects into productive starters, but Ross looks to me like the kind of pitcher -- impressive but hittable stuff, lots of talent but very inconsistent execution -- who will be most likely to realize his upside if he gets some guidance of the sort that doesn't seem to be provided much by the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brach's value is he's an All star level reliever that can close or pitch 1+ IP in a set up role.  He's shown that he can be that guy that can come in and get you out of a jam in the 7th and then pitch the 8th.  That is almost more valuable than your standard closer.  

He has 1.66 cheap years remaining at the moment.  

I think we could get a pretty good haul for him, but that depends on the market.  KC could flood the market if they decide to completely blow it up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I try not to be too pessimistic about our inability to develop pitching prospects into productive starters, but Ross looks to me like the kind of pitcher -- impressive but hittable stuff, lots of talent but very inconsistent execution -- who will be most likely to realize his upside if he gets some guidance of the sort that doesn't seem to be provided much by the Orioles.

I also have a lack of faith in the Orioles to develop pitchers. But if I was doing a rebuild I would stockpile as much young, promising pitching and hope for the best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I'd want Eric Fedde from the Nats.  #51 prospect in MLB.  Seems like that's been the going rate for a guy like Brach.  

I'm not sure Brach would get you Fedde. Andrew Miller got the Yankees a #50ish and #80ish prospect so I think a guy like Britton could get you Fedde and Kieboom for sure if he comes back healthy and dominant. I'm not sure Brach is on that level but could still get some guys with solid upside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lucky_13 said:

I'm not sure Brach would get you Fedde. Andrew Miller got the Yankees a #50ish and #80ish prospect so I think a guy like Britton could get you Fedde and Kieboom for sure if he comes back healthy and dominant. I'm not sure Brach is on that level but could still get some guys with solid upside. 

Maybe.  I think the ideal situation for us would be to get a top 100 SP for Brach that is close to the majors.  

I haven't had time to see what teams need high end relievers and who is likely to be available.  If it's a seller's market that we could certainly get that.  We traded Ed Rod, who was top 70 at the time, for 2.5 months of Miller.  So it happens.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lucky_13 said:

I also have a lack of faith in the Orioles to develop pitchers. But if I was doing a rebuild I would stockpile as much young, promising pitching and hope for the best. 

I think of that approach -- which I understand, though our history with growing the arms makes me wonder about it -- as being implemented by acquiring guys who can be gotten cheaper because they're at an earlier stage of development than Ross, who's thrown 225 innings in MLB (though not necessarily younger than Ross, who's only 24). I think the Nats would place a pretty high value on Ross. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see what you're saying. I think controllable pitching is what I should have said. Which is why Ross makes sense if the team wanted to get younger and retool(which I'd prefer)for a run in a year or two instead of blowing it up completely. He has had success at the majors and if the Orioles could fix him you'd have a young rotation led by Bundy, Ross, and Gausmen.  Also I'd try to get guys who are major league ready so the Orioles don't have to develop them entirely since it's something they have shown they are incapable of doing.

For the Nats, they are a solid bullpen away from a World Series so I think the team could get them to give up more then they would otherwise want to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't target Ross - especially after watchin him lose focus against the Braves the other day.  He's not a kid anymore, and he's been injury-prone throughout his career.  As was mentioned, the Nats really need 2 guys in the pen, and combining Brach and Britton should get a really nice haul from the Nats.  I'd see if we could get Fedde, Kieboom AND Juan Soto.  We could also give them back one of our OFers (anyone other than Hays or Mullens).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

 I'd see if we could get Fedde, Kieboom AND Juan Soto.  We could also give them back one of our OFers (anyone other than Hays or Mullens).  

LOL

 

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

As was mentioned, the Nats really need 2 guys in the pen, and combining Brach and Britton should get a really nice haul from the Nats.  I'd see if we could get Fedde, Kieboom AND Juan Soto.  We could also give them back one of our OFers (anyone other than Hays or Mullens).  

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ruzious said:

I wouldn't target Ross - especially after watchin him lose focus against the Braves the other day.  He's not a kid anymore, and he's been injury-prone throughout his career.  As was mentioned, the Nats really need 2 guys in the pen, and combining Brach and Britton should get a really nice haul from the Nats.  I'd see if we could get Fedde, Kieboom AND Juan Soto.  We could also give them back one of our OFers (anyone other than Hays or Mullens).  

If Britton is healthy and you actually deal them both to the Nats, Victor Robles is in the deal or there's no deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...