Jump to content

The Nick Markakis 2,000th hit countdown thread


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Through ten games, .325/.413/.525, with 2 doubles, 2 homers and 7 RBI.

Time to give the Braves a phone call?

Really wouldn't mind seeing him in RF again.  Probably need them to take Trumbo though and I'm not sure that will help things that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aglets said:

Time to give the Braves a phone call?

Really wouldn't mind seeing him in RF again.  Probably need them to take Trumbo though and I'm not sure that will help things that much.

Nick is one of my all-time favorites, but I’m not living in the past.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, that's a valid move to make.

Then what happens with Trumbo, Pedro, Valencia?     Do we then jettison one of them and have a platoon DH situation?

I'm looking at trying to slightly improve the present, and help our payroll flexibility for 2019.

Past 4 years - Trumbo has been worth around 3 WAR

Past 4 years - Markakis has been worth 6 WAR

 

Markakis is making less money, AND we would not be committed to him beyond 2018.   Neither one is an elite defender at this point, so I think that's basically a wash or maybe Nick is slightly better.   Markakis has never lost his OBP abilities.....something this team sorely needs.

Plus we'd be out from Trumbo's contract for next year.   I'm just pointing out it's not a crazy idea, we could use some payroll help.   I guess the risk is that Trumbo remembers how to hit again after a really bad 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aglets said:

OK, that's a valid move to make.

Then what happens with Trumbo, Pedro, Valencia?     Do we then jettison one of them and have a platoon DH situation?

I'm looking at trying to slightly improve the present, and help our payroll flexibility for 2019.

Past 4 years - Trumbo has been worth around 3 WAR

Past 4 years - Markakis has been worth 6 WAR

 

Markakis is making less money, AND we would not be committed to him beyond 2018.   Neither one is an elite defender at this point, so I think that's basically a wash or maybe Nick is slightly better.   Markakis has never lost his OBP abilities.....something this team sorely needs.

Plus we'd be out from Trumbo's contract for next year.   I'm just pointing out it's not a crazy idea, we could use some payroll help.   I guess the risk is that Trumbo remembers how to hit again after a really bad 2017.

If I have the keys I'm cutting guys and bringing up kids.

Maybe Stewart in left, Jones in Center, Hays in right with Mancini at DH, Pedro at Norfolk and Trumbo on the streets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, I should've have anticipated that.........you've made it clear you're pro tanking this year to build for the future.  Bringing up kids to see what they got, etc.   That's a fine intellectual experiment to ponder in the realm of the hypothetical, but we know it has no basis in reality in terms of how Duquette and Buck are running the team this year.

I should've phrased it this way:

If you were in charge of the current roster AND you were planning on competing for a playoff spot, what would you do?

Bonus question #2.   Who do you think accumulates more bWAR this year, Nick or Trumbo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Alright, I should've have anticipated that.........you've made it clear you're pro tanking this year to build for the future.  Bringing up kids to see what they got, etc.   That's a fine intellectual experiment to ponder in the realm of the hypothetical, but we know it has no basis in reality in terms of how Duquette and Buck are running the team this year.

I should've phrased it this way:

If you were in charge of the current roster AND you were planning on competing for a playoff spot, what would you do?

Bonus question #2.   Who do you think accumulates more bWAR this year, Nick or Trumbo?

I think there is a fair chance that a team with Stewart and Hays in the outfield and Mancini at DH is better than what they are currently putting out there.

I expect Nick to put up a positive rWAR this year.

I do not expect Trumbo to put up a positive rWAR this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think there is a fair chance that a team with Stewart and Hays in the outfield and Mancini at DH is better than what they are currently putting out there.

I expect Nick to put up a positive rWAR this year.

I do not expect Trumbo to put up a positive rWAR this year.

Fair enough.

So it seems like you actually agree with me about the Nick vs Trumbo thing and were just trolling.  Thanks.......wish we could've figured that out a bit earlier on tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...