Jump to content

My early speculation on arbitration raises


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...
On 8/25/2017 at 8:28 PM, Frobby said:

The seasons not over, but we kind of know who's had a good season or a bad one.

Manny Machado: He's made $5 mm and $11.5 mm the last two years.    He's having a slightly down season but still may finish with 35 HR and 100 RBI.   I'm guessing he will make $17 mm next year.   For reference points, Josh Donaldon is making $17 mm this year after  making $11.6 last year; Nolan Arenado will make $17.75 mm next year after making $11.75 this year.

Zach Britton: He made $3.2 mm, $6.75 mm and $11.4 mm the last three years.  He's been hurt a lot and not nearly as effective this year as in 2014-16.    I'll guess he earns $13.2 mm.    Precedent: Chris Davis  was raised from $10.35 mm to $12 mm after his lousy 2014 campaign.

Jonathan Schoop:  He made $3.475 mm this year.   He's had a career year and will deserve a nice bump.   I'm guessing he makes $8 mm next year.    Precedent: Roughned Odor's long term deal increases from $3.33 mm to $7.83 mm this year.     Also, Manny got a 130% raise in his 2nd year of arbitration after an excellent year.

Kevin Gausman:   He's been a big disappointment.  He earned $3.45 mm this year as a Super-2.    I'm guessing $5.25 mm for Gausman next year.   Precedent:   Chris Tillman was raised from $4.315 mm to $6.225 mm after a disappointing 2015 season.

Brad Brach:  He made $1.25 mm and $3.05 mm the last two years, beating the Orioles in arbitration this last time.    He's had a decent year, not a great one, and was called into closer duty for a while and was only so-so in that role.    My guess is he goes to $5.25 mm.    Precedent:  Tyler Clippard went from $4.0 mm to $5.875 mm after a nice season where he posted a 2.41 ERA as a setup man.    Britton went from $3.2 mm to $6.75 mm after his second year as closer.    From a percentage point of view, this is between those two.

Caleb Joseph:  He lost his arbitration case and is making $700,000 after a historically bad season.    This year he's having his best year and has earned his way to playing roughly 50% of the time.   I haven't found a really good comp but I think his salary at least triples.   Put me down for $2.25 mm.

Tim Beckham:  he earned $885 k this year as a Super Two.   He's had a breakout year, especially since being traded to the O's.    He's got a huge raise coming -- to $3 mm?     Precedent:  Roughned Odor made $1.33 mm as a Super-2, increased to $3.33 mm next year as a part of his long-term deal after a 2.4 WAR, .798 OPS season.    

I have $53.95 mm for these 7 players, who made about $34.3 mm this year.    

Anyone I have too high or low?

Pretty good so far!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, weams said:

Pretty good so far!

Yeah, I haven't done too badly on these five, though on a percentage basis I was pretty far off on Caleb.    I like my projections on Schoop and Gausman better than MLBTR's.   They were high on both IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I miss something where it was determined that giving Britton 12m for the season was the right move with him on the shelf for God knows how long? I guess paying 12m for a guy who is a FA after this year, which we have zero chance of retaining in the hope he comes back from injury sometime before July, and proves he is valuable enough to trade....is worth the wasted 6m or so (if not more)? For a team that watches every penny seems like an odd move. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TradeAngelos said:

Did I miss something where it was determined that giving Britton 12m for the season was the right move with him on the shelf for God knows how long? I guess paying 12m for a guy who is a FA after this year, which we have zero chance of retaining in the hope he comes back from injury sometime before July, and proves he is valuable enough to trade....is worth the wasted 6m or so (if not more)? For a team that watches every penny seems like an odd move. 

 

They didn't have a choice.   They had tendered him a contract before the injury occurred, and although you can cut a player for "lack of skill" before the season and pay only one month's salary, you can't cut a guy for injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

They didn't have a choice.   They had tendered him a contract before the injury occurred, and although you can cut a player for "lack of skill" before the season and pay only one month's salary, you can't cut a guy for injury.

They tendered him what contract? When? The arb deal? I'm confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TradeAngelos said:

They tendered him what contract? When? The arb deal? I'm confused.

Back at the beginning of December, there was a deadline for tendering contracts to players under team control.    If you don't tender a contract then, the player becomes a free agent.  The O's tendered a contract to Britton at the time.    That automatically triggered his right to go to arbitration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Back at the beginning of December, there was a deadline for tendering contracts to players under team control.    If you don't tender a contract then, the player becomes a free agent.  The O's tendered a contract to Britton at the time.    That automatically triggered his right to go to arbitration.

Ok thanks for clearing that up. 

Did we not know this at the time? Why all the talk about non tendering him or giving him a 2 year smaller deal? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TradeAngelos said:

Ok thanks for clearing that up. 

Did we not know this at the time? Why all the talk about non tendering him or giving him a 2 year smaller deal? 

There was confusion on the day the injury was first reported.    Britton and whoever interviewed him seemed not to know that you can't cut a player who has been tendered a contract due to injury to avoid arbitration.   It got cleared up pretty quickly in the press, and there was substantial discussion here about the point, but some people missed it and just saw the initial press reports.    If you go back to the original thread about Britton's injury, you can find that discussion there as it developed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TradeAngelos said:

Did I miss something where it was determined that giving Britton 12m for the season was the right move with him on the shelf for God knows how long? I guess paying 12m for a guy who is a FA after this year, which we have zero chance of retaining in the hope he comes back from injury sometime before July, and proves he is valuable enough to trade....is worth the wasted 6m or so (if not more)? For a team that watches every penny seems like an odd move. 

 

They were obligated. They had tendered him. They could have fought over a million I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TradeAngelos said:

Ok thanks for clearing that up. 

Did we not know this at the time? Why all the talk about non tendering him or giving him a 2 year smaller deal? 

Reporters went off that route and had Zach half convinced for half a day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...