Jump to content

Cafardo: Showalter losing the clubhouse


eddie83

Recommended Posts

Sounds like an opportunity to purge some malcontents among the players.

Everyone who Showalter "lost" needs to raise their hands so they can be sent somewhere else to enjoy the coaching of others.

Based on the past season, there's none of the veterans I'd keep instead of Buck.

These guys just aren't that good that they can be complaining about anyone else performance at their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Our AAA pitchers were horrible most of the year.    The alternatives might have done better, but it certainly wasn't obvious.   Here are the 2017 major league ERA's of Norfolk's top starters:

Aquino 7.43

Ynoa 4.15

Wilson 7.04

Wright 5.76

Two guys on your list had lower ERAs than Jimenez, albeit at different levels. Wright doesn’t inspire much confidence, but Jimenez inspires none. Ynoa had pitched well in the ML action he saw and was a much better candidate than Jimenez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mdbdotcom said:

A thought and a question.

1) The guys Buck has counted on for years to police the clubhouse - Jones, Davis, Hardy, Wieters, Tillman - were either gone or largely irrelevant this season. Players who can't get their own jobs done cannot lead. 

2) Cafardo has had a good relationship with Duquette since DD ran the Red Sox. Could it be that DD was the source of these rumors with tensions between he and Buck escalating?

The guys listed as clubhouse leaders were more likely the reason Buck May have lost confidence amongst the players. Jones not as much as some others but still. Trumbo and Davis not being moved down until late in the season was dumb. I’d be surprised if the loyalty to vets when there are alternatives didn’t frustrate some guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

Jimenez had earned  nothing but still managed to retain his rotation spot for most of the season.  

Pretty sure that someone should edit the wikipedia entry for the sunk cost fallacy so that it has a photo of Ubaldo Jimenez.  He's literally the subject for the real life example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is entirely within the realm of possibility that Buck might have lost some prestige after the bad decision last year, but I doubt that the players "quit" on him in September. 

However, it is also possible that the guys realized their SP rotation was so incredibly awful that they didn't press themselves when it mattered most. If anything, there would be an issue with DD for not getting decent pitching last offseason and not so much anger directed at Buck. The sad thing is that we have no idea other than rumor and innuendo about Buck and DD's supposed tension but it wouldn't surprise me at all to know that there's bad feelings on the team because they all knew going in that they didn't have the SP needed to truly compete in 2017. 

Human nature is to sometimes take disappointment out on the people closest to you and since the players deal with Buck, there could have been some misplaced anger directed toward Buck which then feeds the rumor mill. Of course the guys are pissed because they should have been able to get a WC or better if DD had brought in at least 1 decent SP at some point during the year. 

Maybe we should have traded Britton for some prospects (although I heard that no one was offered A+ level talent in return)? 

At this point, does it matter? I truly believe that the team's attitude will improve once the front office does their job during the offseason. 

 

MSK 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Il BuonO said:

Two guys on your list had lower ERAs than Jimenez, albeit at different levels. Wright doesn’t inspire much confidence, but Jimenez inspires none. Ynoa had pitched well in the ML action he saw and was a much better candidate than Jimenez.

Ynoa had a complicated season:

1.   Began at Norfolk and pitched poorly in April: 6.65 ERA.

2.   Got called up on the shuttle in early May and had a brilliant relief appearance for the O's, 0 R in 6 IP.

3.   Got hurt and spent 20 days on the shelf.  

4.   Pitched next 4 games at Norfolk to a 7.31 ERA.

5.   Called up and made 3 relief appearances in a week, to an 8.10 ERA.

6.   Pitched to a 6.12 ERA his next six games at Norfolk, through the end of July.

7.   Had an excellent August, 2.72 ERA in six games.

Realistically, he really didn't merit consideration for the big league rotation until he pitched well in August.      Would I have like to see him make 5-6 starts at the end of the year, instead of the 4 he made (plus 1 relief appearance)?    Sure.   But it's not like he was an obvious rotation candidate earlier in the year.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Townie72 said:

Sounds like an opportunity to purge some malcontents among the players.

Everyone who Showalter "lost" needs to raise their hands so they can be sent somewhere else to enjoy the coaching of others.

Based on the past season, there's none of the veterans I'd keep instead of Buck.

These guys just aren't that good that they can be complaining about anyone else performance at their job.

 

1 hour ago, Townie72 said:

Sounds like an opportunity to purge some malcontents among the players.

Everyone who Showalter "lost" needs to raise their hands so they can be sent somewhere else to enjoy the coaching of others.

Based on the past season, there's none of the veterans I'd keep instead of Buck.

These guys just aren't that good that they can be complaining about anyone else performance at their job.

What if is O'Day who has trade protection? What if it is Davis and his immovable contract? What it is Bundy or Schoop both of which are valuable assets that are under control for longer than Buck is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Ynoa had a complicated season:

1.   Began at Norfolk and pitched poorly in April: 6.65 ERA.

2.   Got called up on the shuttle in early May and had a brilliant relief appearance for the O's, 0 R in 6 IP.

3.   Got hurt and spent 20 days on the shelf.  

4.   Pitched next 4 games at Norfolk to a 7.31 ERA.

5.   Called up and made 3 relief appearances in a week, to an 8.10 ERA.

6.   Pitched to a 6.12 ERA his next six games at Norfolk, through the end of July.

7.   Had an excellent August, 2.72 ERA in six games.

Realistically, he really didn't merit consideration for the big league rotation until he pitched well in August.      Would I have like to see him make 5-6 starts at the end of the year, instead of the 2 he made (plus 2 relief appearances)?    Sure.   But it's not like he was an obvious rotation candidate earlier in the year.     

Ynoa started 4 games for the O's in September.   

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.fcgi?id=ynoaga01&t=p&year=2017

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[Joke stolen from an Albert Brooks movie]

Orioles owner: What is it, Brady? I'm very busy right now. I'll start thinking about what we should do with the ballclub after the World Series. The Series hasn't even started yet, has it?

Brady: This is important.  There are reports that Buck has lost the clubhouse. We really should look into this right away.

Orioles owner: Oh, boy. That's terrible. I've been in the clubhouse. Once, I think. It's a really big room with all kinds of expensive stuff in it. How could Showalter lose the whole thing? If he has lost the clubhouse somehow, tell him he'd better find it fast, or the cost of replacing it will be coming out of his salary. I can't afford to buy a new clubhouse every few years just because the manager loses the damn thing.

Brady: Yes, Mr. Angelos. Right away.

Orioles owner:  By the way, you haven't discussed any of this with Don -- what's his name? -- Duquette, have you?

Brady: Of course not.

Orioles owner:  Good. Well, you and I will have to talk one of these days about improving the ball club for next season. We'll probably need to add some starting pitchers. There's no big hurry, though. We should score plenty of runs with Davis, Machado and Trumbone all back for another year. I think we're going to win it all in 2018!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ArtVanDelay said:

 

That moment planted a seed of doubt in my mind about him.  I didn’t want him fired, but I also didn’t think quite as highly of him anymore.  Maybe the players felt the same way.  It could’ve snowballed into something bigger.

 

 

 

14 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

Explain how a seed of doubt about a Wildcard playoff game in October of 2016 "snowballed" if they started the next season (2017) at 22-10?

 

And how did a team with an absolute mess of a starting rotation and an extremely overworked bullpen manage to stay in contention through early September if they were still pouting and dragging their feet about a bad decision made by their manager from a playoff game from the previous October? 

o

 

 

5 hours ago, ArtVanDelay said:

 

Pouting and dragging their feet?   They’re professionals.  I think you’re over-dramatizing what losing the clubhouse is.  The American League was terrible this year.  In a normal year, we wouldn’t have been in contention so long. 

I’m not even arguing that Buck did lose the clubhouse.  I have no idea.  I’m just giving reasons why it’s possible.  

 

o

 

Fine.

Disregard "pouting and dragging their feet." 

We'll use your words, and your assertion.

What are you implying when you say that the team "May have turned on Showalter" after the Wildcard game loss last October, and how exactly could a team that tuned on their manager could have started the next season at 22-10? 

 

And if they are professionals, as you also assert, why would said professionals turn on their manager because of a bad decision that he made in a single-game elimination playoff? Pouting and dragging their feet is unprofessional and overly-dramatic, but turning on their manager because of a bad decision in a playoff game from the previous season is reasonable behavior from said professionals?

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

The starting performance was so bad there's blame to go around.  Dan's record for obtaining starting pitching certainly is not good.  But there was zero reason, at least from a competitive baseball standpoint, to have stuck with Tillman and Jimenez for so long.  I love Tillman and he had earned a long leash this season IMO, but he still managed to stay in the rotation about a month too long.  Jimenez had earned  nothing but still managed to retain his rotation spot for most of the season.  I cannot imagine how frustrating it must have been to watch the starting pitching on this team this year.

Buck had very few options in regards to starting pitching.  He had no authority to DFA Jimenez.  That would have been Dan's call.   He sent him to the bullpen which marginally improved his coming back to the rotation in the last two years, but did not do so this time.  But it is really hard to have many good options when you retain a pitcher like Jiminez for 13 million reasons who essentially is taking up a slot without being able to provide anything.  Same way with Tillman- he was taking up a slot and gave us nothing in performance.  Buck threw Asher out there, threw Aquino out there, even gave Tyler Wilson another start....for no apparent reason or improvement.   So what does Dan do?  He adds Jeremy Hellickson...great...that really worked out well.   None of these decisions about who is on the roster, who gets DFAd, who gets traded were primarily Buck's calls, imho... they were Duquette's calls.     And if players got upset with the manager sticking too long with veterans not performing (which I seriously doubt was the case)...well, I can go through the roster and wonder if there were times when their performances also sucked during the year.   I doubt that this is anything except a Boston reporter blowing smoke up Buck's you know what.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...