Jump to content

Brian Roberts trade rumors back on!


ed101elove

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Trading BRob plus a young pitcher for a .240 hitter with potential is a real comedown from the rumored Cubs' deal.

In terms of quantity, yes...but Weeks is probably a better talent than anyone the Cubs were willing to give up.

I wouldn't do a Roberts + pitcher for Weeks deal anyway. As I said, if Weeks is worth more than Roberts, they should keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Once a thread is locked, don't re-start a duplicate.

2. There's no evidence that Rosenthal said any such thing, so I fixed that for you.

3. elismlbrumors.com isn't considered a "credible source."

Apologies. I see the link now. In the future, please provide a direct link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roberts is actually having a pretty decent season, but he's going to stay under the radar while he's not leading the league in any category (well, besides triples).

We need to make sure he gets elected to the All Star team so he gets some publicity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You people are back? You have no idea what players would be involved in a trade or even if there is one so to say it is a letdown of your teams offers is ridiculous. Lets see how your players pan out before you guys all stick your chest out too far on the trade that didn't happen.
I don't understand why you are being so defensive.

The much-romored Cubs deal was hands-down better than an offer of just Rickie Weeks, not to mentione if we have to include something else on top of that.

Maybe that rumor wasn't true, but there was an awful lot of smoke there. Its quite likely that the Cubs did indeed offer Gallagher, Cedeno, and Patterson and maybe even included one of Veal, Marshall, Murton, Ceda, or Colvin along with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why you are being so defensive.

The much-romored Cubs deal was hands-down better than an offer of just Rickie Weeks, not to mentione if we have to include something else on top of that.

Maybe that rumor wasn't true, but there was an awful lot of smoke there. Its quite likely that the Cubs did indeed offer Gallagher, Cedeno, and Patterson and maybe even included one of Veal, Marshall, Murton, Ceda, or Colvin along with them.

I doubt we would be the ones including anything in a BRob/Weeks scenario.

I would take Weeks over any 2 or 3(depending on the player combinations) of the rumored Cubs players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt we would be the ones including anything in a BRob/Weeks scenario.

I would take Weeks over any 2 or 3(depending on the player combinations) of the rumored Cubs players.

Not me, I'd rather have Gallagher and either Cedeno or Patterson over Weeks. But, I am very high on Gallagher.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weeks is a pretty bad defensive 2nd baseman. I won't mind taking him for Roberts, but I would definitely want someone else including in the deal that has some value.

But why is he bad? That is the question.

He is athletic and talented enough to where he shouldn't be as bad as he is...Likely, he has footwork issues and poor work ethic when it comes to his defense...He is still only 25, so he has time to work at it and become at least average over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any chance of DCab, Sherrill, and Brob for Gamel, Escobar, LaPorta, and Weeks? Would we have include some youngsters? Would the Brew crew even consider it? I mean if Brob could net you Weeks and Sherrill, Escober, could DCab net Gamel and LaPorta? What else would we have to include if anything? To get young studs like that would be a fantastic move for us. Our infield would be set for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...