Jump to content

Can the O's sign Manny contingent on being trade?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

The O's can't afford to sign Manny and keep him.

The O's are limited in how much they can get in return for Manny when he is only a one year rental.

Is is against MLB rules for the O's to sign him contingent upon a pre-negotiated trade.   The O's would work with the team that is willing be pay Manny the contract he wants.   Say 10/350 and trade the O's the players they want.   The O's would sign Manny to that contract contingent on the trade being executed.   

That way if the team backed out the contract would be void.

The O's would be acting as the negotiator between Manny/his agent and the acquiring team.   The O's would get more then what they would get if Manny was a rental.  Manny get his desired contract without the risk of injury in 2018 hurt his value before free agency.

Any rules against this?

I think the only team that idea would work with is the Yankees because that is where he is going in 2019.  If we can get the prospects from them for them to get him 1 year sooner and a guaranteed 2018 WS trophy.  Maybe they would go for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...