Jump to content

If we could trade Angelos/ownership...


Catch 8

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you think Angelos would specifically write John out of a controlling interest in the team?

 

I have no way of knowing, of course, but it has happened. Again, John Cooke fully expected to take over the Redskins operation when Jack Kent Cooke died. Daddy had other plans. 

But no, I assume John Angelos will assume Peter's roll as Grand Poobah of Orioleland. I just think he's got a much better baseball mind (not that I've heard much of Peter's thinking). And I definitely think he's more in tune with the modern game and players. 

I just wish PA would retire now, as in getting 100% out of baseball operations. If he's behind this whole Manny debacle, he really needs to be moved to the porch. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Unless a team is willing to open their books to public scrutiny I refuse to believe they are operating at a loss or break even level.

The Marlins are supposedly losing money yet they just sold for 1.2B.

They have all these people fooled I mean just look at the book at the top of the page explaining every single way the team is so broke and on the verge of total collapse. Angelos is a genius, he has brainwashed an entire city and made them completely erase large chunks of years totally from existence, while believing MASN is just a financial anchor and makes them nothing either. All after extorting MLB and the Nats for hundreds upon hundreds of millions in PERPETUITY!! . Never seen anything like it. This is the guy who should have a statue built, and I have no doubt there would be people praying at the feet of it before every game showing their undying love and respect for this man who bought the team as a charitable donation for the city. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...