Jump to content

Luke's Top 50 Orioles Prospects!


weams

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ChuckS said:

The command issues are not what bothers me so much.  It's the lack of swing and miss and the fact that he gets hit around despite the plus fastball at such a low level.  

It seems like he has a lot to overcome and his future could be in the pen, if that fastball gets up into the upper 90's like you suspect. 

With both Peluffo and Dietz, the fastball is more a weak contact pitch than a K pitch (although Peluffo’s does miss some bats). The issue is they don’t throw their offspeed pitches well enough or close enough to the plate to rack up strikeouts.  The lack of strikeouts is a command issue in their cases (although I doubt Dietz is ever going to be a big K guy, even if he hits his ceiling, more a keep the ball in the park, innings eater).

Command generally improves for tall pitchers later. Obviously both of these guys are long shots, well in the 20s of O’s prospects, but I’d bet one of these two will end up making a jump next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, ReclaimTheCrown said:

Thanks for the write-ups. This is terrific, as they all have been. You say that Lowther’s fastball lacks “plane”; what do you mean by that?

Usually worded “downward plane”. I’m assuming that’s what was meant here. If Lowther is 6’2” and has a low 3/4 arm slot he won’t create as much of an angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reyes, Santander, and then presumably a Top 10 with Hays, Sisco, Mullins, Mountcastle and Stewart are a nice batch.  By Schoop's first FA season 2020, that could be the entire lineup except shortstop, once Mancini and Davis are added in.  

That Duquette bought Manny Ramirez, Angelos splurged for Davis, and that the 2020 team's payroll structure could be...

1B Davis - $21M (and a platoon partner - Santander or Reyes/Mountcastle 3B loser)

2B Beckham - Arb4

SS Machado - ???

3B - Reyes/Mountcastle winner - 0-3

LF - Santander/Stewart/Mountcastle winner - 0-3

CF - Mullins - 0-3

RF - Hays - 0-3

DH - Mancini - Arb1

OF4 - Santander/Stewart/Mountcastle loser - 0-3

...gives me my little bit of hope that we could support a requisite Machado FA salary early next decade.  

But it's all moot if Bundy, Gausman, Harvey and one or two others don't show in 2018 they are a viable pitching core for Machado to bestow his prime upon.  My glimmer of hope for Machado has me agnostic at best at putting a $15M + number on 2019-2020 for some mediocre mid rotation guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OrioleDog said:

Reyes, Santander, and then presumably a Top 10 with Hays, Sisco, Mullins, Mountcastle and Stewart are a nice batch.  By Schoop's first FA season 2020, that could be the entire lineup except shortstop, once Mancini and Davis are added in.  

That Duquette bought Manny Ramirez, Angelos splurged for Davis, and that the 2020 team's payroll structure could be...

1B Davis - $21M (and a platoon partner - Santander or Reyes/Mountcastle 3B loser)

2B Beckham - Arb4

SS Machado - ???

3B - Reyes/Mountcastle winner - 0-3

LF - Santander/Stewart/Mountcastle winner - 0-3

CF - Mullins - 0-3

RF - Hays - 0-3

DH - Mancini - Arb1

OF4 - Santander/Stewart/Mountcastle loser - 0-3

...gives me my little bit of hope that we could support a requisite Machado FA salary early next decade.  

But it's all moot if Bundy, Gausman, Harvey and one or two others don't show in 2018 they are a viable pitching core for Machado to bestow his prime upon.  My glimmer of hope for Machado has me agnostic at best at putting a $15M + number on 2019-2020 for some mediocre mid rotation guy.

But. Manny is going to go to FA no matter what is offered. And he will take the highest bid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, weams said:

But. Manny is going to go to FA no matter what is offered. And he will take the highest bid. 

Sure.  The hope is the Bundy/Mancini/Hays/Gausman core of the early 2020's projects to have enough average regulars everywhere else on the diamond but SS for the org to compete to the $40M level to retain the franchise SS.

I give it maybe a 10% shot, with the driver being the org's 5 best pitchers collectively hit their 90th percentile this year so our $400M isn't Confederate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Sure.  The hope is the Bundy/Mancini/Hays/Gausman core of the early 2020's projects to have enough average regulars everywhere else on the diamond but SS for the org to compete to the $40M level to retain the franchise SS.

I give it maybe a 10% shot, with the driver being the org's 5 best pitchers collectively hit their 90th percentile this year so our $400M isn't Confederate.

 

Nothing is confederate any longer. There is only so much money and so many places for these players. Anyone who spends 400 million will get their man.  I think what we are finding, is that there is no place in this game for the 400 million dollar man. Whatever be his name. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ReclaimTheCrown said:

Thanks, that makes sense that he’d get some run but not as much dive.

@Il BuonO is on it. Lowther has plenty of life on his fastball but my main concern is that it’ll get put in the air a lot against advanced hitters. Now I think his ability to command the pitch will alleviate some of that, but it’s still a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree, McCann C is decision number one. After that, against a reverse split guy I think you just start your best overall players. However, O'Hearn has such poor splits vs LHP and so little experience I can't imagine they start him. Adley DH would allow Hyde to avoid the O'Hearn vs LHP decision. Kjerstad had hit lefties well but they gave him only 18 AB. That is a big ask of a rookie. Might be Adley if they think McCann makes Burnes better. Definite starters: Gunnar, Westburg, Santander, Mountcastle, Urias, Cowser Probable: Mullins Pick two: Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Kjerstad  
    • What you said here is what I’ve been trying to convey.  OAA and dWAR aren’t intended to measure the same thing.   They shouldn’t be mentioned together.  If Fangraphs took its FRV and Positional stats and added them together, then divided that number by 10ish to convert it from runs to wins, you’d have a stat to compare to dWAR.
    • I think Adley is the DH tomorrow. 
    • Nice job pointing out Ragans pitches better against righties than lefties: The Orioles put a heavy emphasis on the pitcher's splits over the hitter's split, so Mullins could very well start. Interestingly though, lefties BABIP was a unsustainable .345. Here's his pitch% and results against lefties this year. With this info, I think the Orioles very well may start Mullins instead of Slater. Now, will they start O'Hearn over Rivera at DH?
    • Nope I wanna see the guy with the better defense. Just pointing out that Slater’s only “advantage” is another liability. Plus, Reagan’s is a reverse splits guy. 
    • The late season partial revival was enough for BAL to finish 3rd MLB-wide to the Judge/Soto team and the Shohei/Mookie/Freddie one. Split up those first two and put another year on everybody else, and I like our shot to go 1st some season soon. Park effects, it is notable the FG readout gives the Orioles with a 250/315/435 line a fraction of a point edge in the 115 wRC+ tie for 3rd and 4th with the Diamondbacks, who posted a 263/337/440 line. Don't be dull, October Orange Machine.
    • Mullins has slashed .196/.228/.278/.506 against lefties this year. Slater has not had a great year overall and his September was terrible, but the Orioles really like platoon matchups. Plus, having Mullins speed and pop on the bench gives them options late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...