Jump to content

10, and the lessons of life


weams

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

As noted in Adam’s post before that one, today is the 10th anniversary of the trade that brought Adam to Baltimore.    Hard to believe it’s been that long.   

My thought exactly.  Can't believe it's been 10 years since that deal happened.  A lot of us have been on here a long, long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

My thought exactly.  Can't believe it's been 10 years since that deal happened.  A lot of us have been on here a long, long time.

Talk about a trade that took a long time to develop - Bedard was openly shopped at the winter meetings and it took Andy until Feb. 8 to develop a deal that was to his liking.     As good as the trade turned out, the Reds offered some packages that might have been even better.    But I’m not complaining.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Talk about a trade that took a long time to develop - Bedard was openly shopped at the winter meetings and it took Andy until Feb. 8 to develop a deal that was to his liking.     As good as the trade turned out, the Reds offered some packages that might have been even better.    But I’m not complaining.   

Not complaining, either.  Not at all.

I do remember, around that time, that we were working on a trade with the Dodgers and Kershaw was rumored to be a name.  SG was all in on that one, IIRC and I remember it because it was the first time I'd heard of Clayton Kershaw.  I might be misremembering things but I think at one point the Angels had a package, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Not complaining, either.  Not at all.

I do remember, around that time, that we were working on a trade with the Dodgers and Kershaw was rumored to be a name.  SG was all in on that one, IIRC and I remember it because it was the first time I'd heard of Clayton Kershaw.  I might be misremembering things but I think at one point the Angels had a package, too.

We also were rumored to have been offered a package that included both Joey Votto (then the no. 44 prospect per BA) and Johnny Cueto (no. 34) with 2-3 other pieces.    But at the time, Andy was insisting that Jay Bruce (then considered the no. 1 prospect in baseball) be included in the package.   I think the Dodgers offered Kemp in one of their packages, too.   It was a wild winter with tons of rumors, so who knows what we really were offered.   But as I said, no complaints about what we got.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

We also were rumored to have been offered a package that included both Joey Votto (then the no. 44 prospect per BA) and Johnny Cueto (no. 34) with 2-3 other pieces.    But at the time, Andy was insisting that Jay Bruce (then considered the no. 1 prospect in baseball) be included in the package.   I think the Dodgers offered Kemp in one of their packages, too.   It was a wild winter with tons of rumors, so who knows what we really were offered.   But as I said, no complaints about what we got.   

I remember all of the rumored potential packages were awesome. If I remember correctly, at one point the Reds were rumored to be offering Votto, Cueto, and Josh Hamilton. Pretty insane if true.

But, yep, as you said, no complaints about what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theocean said:

I remember all of the rumored potential packages were awesome. If I remember correctly, at one point the Reds were rumored to be offering Votto, Cueto, and Josh Hamilton. Pretty insane if true.

But, yep, as you said, no complaints about what we got.

I know Hamilton was discussed in some of the early packages, though I forget whether those packages included both Votto and Cueto.  Hamilton was traded on December 21, 2007, so he obviously wasn’t in the later packages.   I also remember Drew Stubbs and Edwin Encarnacion being mentioned.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I know Hamilton was discussed in some of the early packages, though I forget whether those packages included both Votto and Cueto.  Hamilton was traded on December 21, 2007, so he obviously wasn’t in the later packages.   I also remember Drew Stubbs and Edwin Encarnacion being mentioned.    

I remember Edwin Encarnacion being put on waivers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I agree, McCann C is decision number one. After that, against a reverse split guy I think you just start your best overall players. However, O'Hearn has such poor splits vs LHP and so little experience I can't imagine they start him. Adley DH would allow Hyde to avoid the O'Hearn vs LHP decision. Kjerstad had hit lefties well but they gave him only 18 AB. That is a big ask of a rookie. Might be Adley if they think McCann makes Burnes better. Definite starters: Gunnar, Westburg, Santander, Mountcastle, Urias, Cowser Probable: Mullins Pick two: Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Kjerstad  
    • What you said here is what I’ve been trying to convey.  OAA and dWAR aren’t intended to measure the same thing.   They shouldn’t be mentioned together.  If Fangraphs took its FRV and Positional stats and added them together, then divided that number by 10ish to convert it from runs to wins, you’d have a stat to compare to dWAR.
    • I think Adley is the DH tomorrow. 
    • Nice job pointing out Ragans pitches better against righties than lefties: The Orioles put a heavy emphasis on the pitcher's splits over the hitter's split, so Mullins could very well start. Interestingly though, lefties BABIP was a unsustainable .345. Here's his pitch% and results against lefties this year. With this info, I think the Orioles very well may start Mullins instead of Slater. Now, will they start O'Hearn over Rivera at DH?
    • Nope I wanna see the guy with the better defense. Just pointing out that Slater’s only “advantage” is another liability. Plus, Reagan’s is a reverse splits guy. 
    • The late season partial revival was enough for BAL to finish 3rd MLB-wide to the Judge/Soto team and the Shohei/Mookie/Freddie one. Split up those first two and put another year on everybody else, and I like our shot to go 1st some season soon. Park effects, it is notable the FG readout gives the Orioles with a 250/315/435 line a fraction of a point edge in the 115 wRC+ tie for 3rd and 4th with the Diamondbacks, who posted a 263/337/440 line. Don't be dull, October Orange Machine.
    • Mullins has slashed .196/.228/.278/.506 against lefties this year. Slater has not had a great year overall and his September was terrible, but the Orioles really like platoon matchups. Plus, having Mullins speed and pop on the bench gives them options late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...