Jump to content

Camp Jobless


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I am sure the reason the league isn't opening it up is it is a publicity stunt.  There are no real MLB players there.  Just a bunch of guys no one wants. If they open camp up and show their best player there is Nolan Reimold the media and fans realize what a joke it is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

How many of these guys are fringe types that have trouble finding work during a regular offseason?  Anyone of actual note there?

Tyler Clippard, Saltalamachia, De Aza, Gorzelanny, Chris Johnson.

One of the points in the article was that these types of guys would get minor league deals with ST invites.  They're not getting those now.  For example, one could make a case that Chris Johnson is a better fit for the Orioles than Tejada or Vielma.  But they won't give him a ST invite?

Hell, despite being out of baseball in 2017 Gorzelanny could be our number 3 starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

Tyler Clippard, Saltalamachia, De Aza, Gorzelanny, Chris Johnson.

One of the points in the article was that these types of guys would get minor league deals with ST invites.  They're not getting those now.  For example, one could make a case that Chris Johnson is a better fit for the Orioles than Tejada or Vielma.  But they won't give him a ST invite?

Hell, despite being out of baseball in 2017 Gorzelanny could be our number 3 starter.

Like I said a publicity stunt. Those guys you are mentioning are guys who's careers are over.  Gorzelanny hasn't' started since 2013.  Chris Johnson hasn't had positive WAR since 2013.  These guys are done that is why they aren't getting minor league deals.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am unsure why there is all this vitriol directed at players trying to make their dream come true.  There is zero reason for this training camp to be like others where players are under contract.  If teams have interest, then normal protocol is that they are not invited unless it is an arranged showcase.

It is as if everyone collectively forgot how these things are done and why.

More so, there seems to be a whole lot of writers carrying water for front offices and a lot of fan buy in on these transparently biased notions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, cimota said:

Like I said a publicity stunt. Those guys you are mentioning are guys who's careers are over.  Gorzelanny hasn't' started since 2013.  Chris Johnson hasn't had positive WAR since 2013.  These guys are done that is why they aren't getting minor league deals.  

I don't see why this is a "publicity stunt".  What is being gained in public relations by doing this?  A lot of these guys are trying to hang on, many won't.   Clippard's career shouldn't be over.  Yes, he was below average for the year, but had a really good, though brief, stint in Chicago.  If we had him on a minor league deal, Buck would be more okay with trading Brach for a starter.

And again, about Johnson.  Say Schoop gets hurt and is out for two months, would you rather Johnson get those ABs or Vielma?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, backwardsk said:

I don't see why this is a "publicity stunt".  What is being gained in public relations by doing this?  A lot of these guys are trying to hang on, many won't.   Clippard's career shouldn't be over.  Yes, he was below average for the year, but had a really good, though brief, stint in Chicago.  If we had him on a minor league deal, Buck would be more okay with trading Brach for a starter.

And again, about Johnson.  Say Schoop gets hurt and is out for two months, would you rather Johnson get those ABs or Vielma?

It is a publicity stunt to state there is collusion and they have to open their own camps.  Yet they keep it private so you can't see that the players are journeymen who's career is over.  There is zero reason for these guys not to be invited to team's camps if teams thought they had an value to them at all.  They would only be signed to minor league deals.

Vielma is supposed to be above average defensively and Johnson is poor defensively and poor offensively.  The guy choose the guy who can field and can't hit over the guy can't field and can't hit.  Not sure what the issue is and certainly not a plot of MLB teams. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cimota said:

It is a publicity stunt to state there is collusion and they have to open their own camps.  Yet they keep it private so you can't see that the players are journeymen who's career is over.  There is zero reason for these guys not to be invited to team's camps if teams thought they had an value to them at all.  They would only be signed to minor league deals.

Vielma is supposed to be above average defensively and Johnson is poor defensively and poor offensively.  The guy choose the guy who can field and can't hit over the guy can't field and can't hit.  Not sure what the issue is and certainly not a plot of MLB teams. 

 

 

Um, there are a ton of free agents without homes yet.  The whole market is still locked. The only pace where things are moving freely are MiL FA in lower minors.  If you have any MLB aspirations, teams are still waiting out up top and you want to have a good idea what your opportunities are before a club locks themselves into a situation where your opportunity disappears.

The camps are private because guys still want to work out with other guys and their training partners have departed to MLB camps.

I would also say that the term "publicity stunt" is being too broadly applied.  We certainly are seeing a rather unique offseason where money is being throttled back.  Collusion is a common word and one that historically ownership has pressed upon players.  When you experience something so strange as this market, it is not all that outlandish to make a claim for which there is historical precedence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree that I don’t see why the slow market for free agents would affect guys who would only be signing MiL contracts with invites anyway.     I’m still not going to call this a “publicity stunt.”   Individual players can decide for themselves whether going to this camp is beneficial for them.   My guess is that the potentially higher-priced ones wouldn’t want to risk an injury.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cimota said:

It is a publicity stunt to state there is collusion and they have to open their own camps.  Yet they keep it private so you can't see that the players are journeymen who's career is over.  There is zero reason for these guys not to be invited to team's camps if teams thought they had an value to them at all.  They would only be signed to minor league deals.

Vielma is supposed to be above average defensively and Johnson is poor defensively and poor offensively.  The guy choose the guy who can field and can't hit over the guy can't field and can't hit.  Not sure what the issue is and certainly not a plot of MLB teams. 

 

 

Kind of a weird take. I mean who does this "publicity stunt" hurt, exactly? Seems like a harmless show of solidarity, plus a convenient place to get your work in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree, McCann C is decision number one. After that, against a reverse split guy I think you just start your best overall players. However, O'Hearn has such poor splits vs LHP and so little experience I can't imagine they start him. Adley DH would allow Hyde to avoid the O'Hearn vs LHP decision. Kjerstad had hit lefties well but they gave him only 18 AB. That is a big ask of a rookie. Might be Adley if they think McCann makes Burnes better. Definite starters: Gunnar, Westburg, Santander, Mountcastle, Urias, Cowser Probable: Mullins Pick two: Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Kjerstad  
    • What you said here is what I’ve been trying to convey.  OAA and dWAR aren’t intended to measure the same thing.   They shouldn’t be mentioned together.  If Fangraphs took its FRV and Positional stats and added them together, then divided that number by 10ish to convert it from runs to wins, you’d have a stat to compare to dWAR.
    • I think Adley is the DH tomorrow. 
    • Nice job pointing out Ragans pitches better against righties than lefties: The Orioles put a heavy emphasis on the pitcher's splits over the hitter's split, so Mullins could very well start. Interestingly though, lefties BABIP was a unsustainable .345. Here's his pitch% and results against lefties this year. With this info, I think the Orioles very well may start Mullins instead of Slater. Now, will they start O'Hearn over Rivera at DH?
    • Nope I wanna see the guy with the better defense. Just pointing out that Slater’s only “advantage” is another liability. Plus, Reagan’s is a reverse splits guy. 
    • The late season partial revival was enough for BAL to finish 3rd MLB-wide to the Judge/Soto team and the Shohei/Mookie/Freddie one. Split up those first two and put another year on everybody else, and I like our shot to go 1st some season soon. Park effects, it is notable the FG readout gives the Orioles with a 250/315/435 line a fraction of a point edge in the 115 wRC+ tie for 3rd and 4th with the Diamondbacks, who posted a 263/337/440 line. Don't be dull, October Orange Machine.
    • Mullins has slashed .196/.228/.278/.506 against lefties this year. Slater has not had a great year overall and his September was terrible, but the Orioles really like platoon matchups. Plus, having Mullins speed and pop on the bench gives them options late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...