Jump to content

Camden Depot: Nick threatened to kick John Hart where it hurts.


weams

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

My guess is he is happy with himself as a ballplayer.  He doesn't want to turn into a hulking monster that gets hurt all the time (steroids) or a guy that strikes out a lot, or worries about his launch angle, etc.

Yea, this guy was a monster!

250px-Dee_Gordon_2015.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 hours ago, 25 Nuggets said:

My guess is he is happy with himself as a ballplayer.  He doesn't want to turn into a hulking monster that gets hurt all the time (steroids) or a guy that strikes out a lot, or worries about his launch angle, etc.

I'm not sure that's a great thing.  As interesting as it might be to have a guy who eschews modern sensibilities and flares a bunch of singles and doubles, he's an average defensive player at an offense-first position with no speed and a 99 OPS+ over the last half a decade.  At this point he's the BJ Surhoff that Syd Thrift traded in the yard sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I hope Nick likes the game enough that he sticks around a long time.  I was against re-signing him at Braves prices, but I've always thought he was a good guy and one of my favorite players.

He's sitting on 2052 career hits.  Last four years he's averaged 171 hits.  If he keeps playing and declines by five hits a year he'll reach 3000 hits during his age-41 season in 2025.  He's in no way a Hall of Famer, but that would be pretty cool.

I honestly think that if Nick was a full time regular for another six years, he'd get the 948 hits he needs to reach 3,000.    I think he could spit out 160 hits a year that long.    The trouble is, I don't think he's going to find a team that's willing to play him 155+ games a year after this season, because his lack of power and declining defense just don't justify putting him out there ever single day like he's used to.

Watching how the FA market has gone this winter, I wonder, if Nick had been a free agent this year, whether he'd still be waiting for some team to sign him.    I mean, Jon Jay is still out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Threatening  a high level boss with violence is not a great move. Having the threat reported by the media makes it a really not great move. Weird situation, to say the least. 

Guaranteed contracts.

What can the GM do?  Release him and pay him?  Trade him? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Threatening  a high level boss with violence is not a great move. Having the threat reported by the media makes it a really not great move. Weird situation, to say the least. 

“Markakis made it known, had the message sent up the chain, that if Hart ever treated the manager that way again that Markakis would, in so many words, kick his ass.”

I guess you can interpret that as threatening Hart with violence.   I doubt Nick was thinking about the media when he “had the message sent up the chain,” whatever that means.    In any event, it seems like his teammates appreciated what he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Frobby said:

“Markakis made it known, had the message sent up the chain, that if Hart ever treated the manager that way again that Markakis would, in so many words, kick his ass.”

I guess you can interpret that as threatening Hart with violence.   I doubt Nick was thinking about the media when he “had the message sent up the chain,” whatever that means.    In any event, it seems like his teammates appreciated what he did.

Interpret? You're a lawyer. If a junior lawyer in your firm told another firm member to tell you that he is going to kick your ass if you do x again I wonder how you would "interpret" it. I'm sure Markakis was not thinking about the media reporting his threat. But when it gets reported it makes it a potentially bigger deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Guaranteed contracts.

What can the GM do?  Release him and pay him?  Trade him? 

 

I'm sure the Braves don't want this to be a big deal, but players have been suspended without pay for extreme insubordination, etc. I'm sure the Braves were very unhappy that this was reported. This being publicized is not in anyone's interest IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Interpret? You're a lawyer. If a junior lawyer in your firm told another firm member to tell you that he is going to kick your ass if you do x again I wonder how you would "interpret" it. I'm sure Markakis was not thinking about the media reporting his threat. But when it gets reported it makes it a potentially bigger deal. 

The part that gives me pause is “in so many words.”    It’s not a direct quote, so we don’t know exactly what Markakis said, or to whom.    Nor does the information provided by the reporter appear to come from Markakis or anyone in the “chain” who he spoke to.    So, it may have been well short of an actual physical threat that anyone would take literally.   Or not.    I’m not saying any of this to defend Markakis; it’s not clear he needs defending regardless of what he said.   But I’m a little wary of the loosey-goosey wording by the reporter.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

I'm sure the Braves don't want this to be a big deal, but players have been suspended without pay for extreme insubordination, etc. I'm sure the Braves were very unhappy that this was reported. This being publicized is not in anyone's interest IMO.

Do you think the Braves would want to tangle with the Player's Union over something like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you think the Braves would want to tangle with the Player's Union over something like this?

I thought I made it clear that I think the Braves are probably very unhappy this made it to the media and are hoping this is forgotten as soon as possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The part that gives me pause is “in so many words.”    It’s not a direct quote, so we don’t know exactly what Markakis said, or to whom.    Nor does the information provided by the reporter appear to come from Markakis or anyone in the “chain” who he spoke to.    So, it may have been well short of an actual physical threat that anyone would take literally.   Or not.    I’m not saying any of this to defend Markakis; it’s not clear he needs defending regardless of what he said.   But I’m a little wary of the loosey-goosey wording by the reporter.    

I hear you. Overall I'm sure the Braves would love for this probable non-story to disappear asap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

I thought I made it clear that I think the Braves are probably very unhappy this made it to the media and are hoping this is forgotten as soon as possible. 

My point is that, realistically, they didn't have a lot of options when it came to dealing with the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree, McCann C is decision number one. After that, against a reverse split guy I think you just start your best overall players. However, O'Hearn has such poor splits vs LHP and so little experience I can't imagine they start him. Adley DH would allow Hyde to avoid the O'Hearn vs LHP decision. Kjerstad had hit lefties well but they gave him only 18 AB. That is a big ask of a rookie. Might be Adley if they think McCann makes Burnes better. Definite starters: Gunnar, Westburg, Santander, Mountcastle, Urias, Cowser Probable: Mullins Pick two: Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Kjerstad  
    • What you said here is what I’ve been trying to convey.  OAA and dWAR aren’t intended to measure the same thing.   They shouldn’t be mentioned together.  If Fangraphs took its FRV and Positional stats and added them together, then divided that number by 10ish to convert it from runs to wins, you’d have a stat to compare to dWAR.
    • I think Adley is the DH tomorrow. 
    • Nice job pointing out Ragans pitches better against righties than lefties: The Orioles put a heavy emphasis on the pitcher's splits over the hitter's split, so Mullins could very well start. Interestingly though, lefties BABIP was a unsustainable .345. Here's his pitch% and results against lefties this year. With this info, I think the Orioles very well may start Mullins instead of Slater. Now, will they start O'Hearn over Rivera at DH?
    • Nope I wanna see the guy with the better defense. Just pointing out that Slater’s only “advantage” is another liability. Plus, Reagan’s is a reverse splits guy. 
    • The late season partial revival was enough for BAL to finish 3rd MLB-wide to the Judge/Soto team and the Shohei/Mookie/Freddie one. Split up those first two and put another year on everybody else, and I like our shot to go 1st some season soon. Park effects, it is notable the FG readout gives the Orioles with a 250/315/435 line a fraction of a point edge in the 115 wRC+ tie for 3rd and 4th with the Diamondbacks, who posted a 263/337/440 line. Don't be dull, October Orange Machine.
    • Mullins has slashed .196/.228/.278/.506 against lefties this year. Slater has not had a great year overall and his September was terrible, but the Orioles really like platoon matchups. Plus, having Mullins speed and pop on the bench gives them options late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...