Jump to content

Cobb to Orioles (Confirmed by Roch Kubatko)


Greg

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

You know, all off-season, all I seen wrote in OH, is we have to sign one of the big three FA.

The team signs one of the big three, and the number 5th FA.

So, you think, somebody would be happy for at least a day? :(

 

It's nice that they replaced a bad starter with a good one.  It's nice that they had the cash to do this.  It gives the overachieving underdog narrative some credibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 687
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

I suppose.  I'm all for more enjoyable baseball, and Cobb should certainly be more enjoyable to watch than a replacement level disaster.  But I do think they have a pretty big hole to climb out of this year.  A lot has to go right to contend.

Look, that is standard operating procedure in Baltimore.  This isn't 1969 where we have the best lineup in the game and the expectations to go with it and it's not 1996 where we have the highest payroll.  To be successful the Orioles always require some luck, some better than expected results and like a good movie, a suspension of reality that says that their roster is as good as the Yankees or Redsox.  It's not.

But on paper, this is a solid SP rotation.  Yes Cashner has questions as do Bundy, Gausman and Tillman.  Britton is on the shelf, Brach seems off etc.  Overall, this entire roster is deeper than it has been in years and it did that without making high risk decisions like Davis/Trumbo.

Does this mean the Orioles will win 100 games?  Of course not.  But and this really is the difference here, a lot has to go right for them to contend... it is also true that a lot has to go WRONG for them to not have a chance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, foxfield said:

Look, that is standard operating procedure in Baltimore.  This isn't 1969 where we have the best lineup in the game and the expectations to go with it and it's not 1996 where we have the highest payroll.  To be successful the Orioles always require some luck, some better than expected results and like a good movie, a suspension of reality that says that their roster is as good as the Yankees or Redsox.  It's not.

But on paper, this is a solid SP rotation.  Yes Cashner has questions as do Bundy, Gausman and Tillman.  Britton is on the shelf, Brach seems off etc.  Overall, this entire roster is deeper than it has been in years and it did that without making high risk decisions like Davis/Trumbo.

Does this mean the Orioles will win 100 games?  Of course not.  But and this really is the difference here, a lot has to go right for them to contend... it is also true that a lot has to go WRONG for them to not have a chance.

 

Why do we think like that? We believe a lot has to go right for us and EVERYTHING will go right for the rest of baseball. 

We're are in it to win it!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN on Lynn Cobb

Quote

There are some underlying differences between them. While Lynn posted a 3.43 ERA with the Cardinals, his peripherals weren’t as good, reflected by his 4.82 FIP. Cobb, meanwhile, has had proven success in the American League East with the Rays, so it’s certainly understandable why he would be a more attractive choice for the Orioles.

 

Also, the same pick forfeited,  on Lynn just for one season. 

http://www.espn.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/85506/alex-cobb-fills-a-hole-as-orioles-try-to-keep-up-in-al-east

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I favored Cobb from the get-go, he has had success in the AL East.

Roch has the metrics:

Quote

* Cobb has strong career numbers against the Red Sox, Yankees and Blue Jays. In 14 career starts versus Boston, he is 6-4 with a 3.43 ERA and 1.254 WHIP. In 14 starts against New York, he is 6-4 with a 2.99 ERA and 0.996 WHIP. In eight career starts versus Toronto, he is 3-3 with a 3.23 ERA and 1.056 WHIP. In 36 career starts against that trio of teams, he is 15-11 with a 3.21 ERA. Cobb also has good career numbers against the Orioles, going 6-2 with a 2.70 ERA.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's nice that they replaced a bad starter with a good one.  It's nice that they had the cash to do this.  It gives the overachieving underdog narrative some credibility.

Its nice that when they claimed they was still in negotiations for another SP, they really was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah we signed Cobb, but one thing that annoys me are people being negative about all that involves DD or Angelos, like they want to hurt our franchise on purpose. Yes sometimes they make poor decisions but at the end of the day they want the best for the Orioles just like us fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Getz said:

Yeah we signed Cobb, but one thing that annoys me are people being negative about all that involves DD or Angelos, like they want to hurt our franchise on purpose. Yes sometimes they make poor decisions but at the end of the day they want the best for the Orioles just like us fans.

I agree, people have a tendency to be very negative, when hiding behind a keyboard or smartphone.

I too, get annoyed, and wonder what team some of the really negative ones actually root for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I agree, people have a tendency to be very negative, when hiding behind a keyboard or smartphone.

I too, get annoyed, and wonder what team some of the really negative ones actually root for.

I wonder the same...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I favored Cobb from the get-go, he has had success in the AL East.

Roch has the metrics:

 

Is there any reason to think that his work from several years ago, prior to surgery, should be weighted more highly than that of last year, post-surgery, in a slightly less competitive league?

I mean other than the idea it makes the signing look better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

You know, all off-season, all I seen wrote in OH, is we have to sign one of the big three FA.

The team signs one of the big three, and the number 5th FA.

So, you think, somebody would be happy for at least a day? :(

 

OH members: "We're screwed, 2018 is hopeless! Our FO needs to sign Cashner or Cobb, or both."

Orioles FO: "Orioles have signed Cashner."

OH members: "Really?"

Orioles FO: "Yes."

OH members: "Well, Tillman and Wright suck so we need Cobb too or we're still screwed."

Orioles FO: "Orioles have signed Cobb."

OH members: (rub eyes in disbelief) "Really? He passed the physical?"

Orioles FO: "Yes."

OH members: "Well, we overpaid."

Orioles FO: "Maybe, maybe not. But we're doing our best to be competitive. Thought that's what you wanted?"

OH members: (searching BBC news frantically) "Well, Trump/North Korea/Putin/Global warming are still going to ruin 2018. So, we're still screwed."

Orioles FO: (raise hands to the sky in exasperation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Its nice that when they claimed they was still in negotiations for another SP, they really was.

I surely hope that none here exclaimed that it was (dare I say?) "fake news or alternate facts" when "they" claimed that!  If so, shame on "them"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Another successful all Oriole grid, 36 rarity points:
    • He was allowed to face LHP.  My post wasn’t disagreeing with your post.  I was saying that not only did we let him face LHP, we let him do so despite not having much success against LHP.  I was pushing back against the narrative that we needlessly platooned Cowser.  Not only did we not platoon him, there is a reasonable argument that we should have platooned more than we did. We needed to play one of Mullins and Cowser in CF. Cowser mostly got the call vs. LHP because he was much better against LHP in the first half of the year, but this flipped in the second half.
    • From Adley to Basallo, I think Elias has eight Bats I hope we get to see all take 600 PA simultaneously some season. Adley was born in 1998, and until he arrived Elias Orioles baseball was bad by design.    For flavor, leaders of those teams like 1994-1997 births Mullins, Santander, Hays and Mountcastle are all between 10th and 20th among bats born their year.   Your team might be drafting Jackson Holliday if they are your club's best players in a rebuild, unless you have great pitching, which...haha, we know Elias' game. MLB Baseball is mostly played by guys 24-32.    286 batters cleared 300 PA in 2024 - about 12% were 33 and up by Fangraphs seasonal age assignments, about 8% were 23 and down. This is just a once a year post, but looking at Bats born from Adley's 1998 to Basallo's 2004, here's how the Orioles achievements compare with MLB's best by rWAR. 1998 - Adley is 4th 1999 - Westburg is 9th, and Kjerstad is 33rd 2000 - Cowser is 16th 2001 - Gunnar is 1st, and Mayo is nearly last, having dug a deep hole in his initial PA.    Trivia - Darell Hernaiz one of the 3 beneath Mayo.    Noelvi Marte dead last also has a PED suspension, d'oh. 2003 - Holliday is 4th - Minnesota the last weekend he got himself out of negative WAR territory. 2004 - Basallo is n/a as Chourio alone has played MLB from that birth year.    Basallo did log the most high minors experience of the 2004 births during the 2024 season. In 2025, Gunnar enters the 24-32 range as Judge departs it.     Cowser's improvement after an off-season a story of comfort for Holliday and Mayo - can they approach his ~3.5 win contribution? Strong, young teams - doing this exercise highlighted Adley's Orioles a little younger than the Braves and all their famous contract extensions.    Acuna, Albies and Riley were all born the year before Adley.   On the AL side of the competition, Yordan and Kyle Tucker also 1997 holding up a strong competitor, though not one that is young anymore.     Judge and Gerrit hoping Soto please stays.    Soto from 1998 - you have to reach back to 1994 for Correa, Bregman and C. Seager to find anyone ahead of him.
    • The Orioles have a lot of flexibility both in terms of prospects, money and potential veterans that hold value. Vets - I could see the Orioles moving on from any of Mountcastle, Mullins, Urias, or O'Hearn. These players may hold the most potential to bullpen upgrades. Money - The Orioles will certainly spend this offseason and that more flexibility than they have had.  I would like to see 1 or 2 extensions, 1 high profile FA, and maybe 1 more solid addition. Prospects - I could see any of the big 4 going somewhere.  I really think the Orioles and Pirates match up really well.  The Pirates have a plethora of young pitchers and the Orioles have young hitters.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the two match up.
    • The hitting philosophy works. That’s why they have been winning the last two years.     Plenty of runs scoring off HR’s in the playoffs. 
    • They would probably want two of Mayo, Basallo, Holliday, and Kjerstad, plus other pieces (likely at least one good pitching prospect, so someone like Povich or McDermott), for both Crochet and Robert.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...