Jump to content

Manny's glove.


Natty

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Shouldn’t a “generational” talent occasionally be the best player on the field? At least three Astro’s better than Manny

This is absolutely right. And he won't be the best shortstop on the field in NY either with the way he's playing. I think he's going to be disappointed in what he's offered in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has there been a bunch of balls that got past him where people say he has no range?

Both mistakes I have seen were the same type we always see from him. He didn’t stop a bad throw from Joseph going into CF last Saturday and he dropped the throw in from Santander yesterday. Neither one had anything to do with playing SS compared to 3B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a reason players typically move from SS to 3B as they age and not the other way around. If the Orioles don't think they are a better team with Machado at SS they should move him back to 3B. They owe him nothing. It's not like he's going to give them a percentage of his contract when he signs with the highest bidder in the off season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

Shouldn’t a “generational” talent occasionally be the best player on the field? At least three Astro’s better than Manny

When Bregman was in the minors I suggested we trade Manny straight up for him.  People on here overrate Manny so badly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, atomic said:

When Bregman was in the minors I suggested we trade Manny straight up for him.  People on here overrate Manny so badly.  

Let’s see how Manny does this year.    I don’t think most people overrate Manny.    I think they may overrate his trade value, considering he is only under control for a short time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildbillhiccup said:

There's a reason players typically move from SS to 3B as they age and not the other way around. If the Orioles don't think they are a better team with Machado at SS they should move him back to 3B. They owe him nothing. It's not like he's going to give them a percentage of his contract when he signs with the highest bidder in the off season. 

Exactly. They should have never made the move. It benefits the TEAM in no way at all. If he signed long-term it might be different. But the move simply made no sense. Now maybe, just maybe, Manny is a club house leader and Buck knows that so this is all about having a happy team leader and such. But I'm not seeing it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

Shouldn’t a “generational” talent occasionally be the best player on the field? At least three Astro’s better than Manny

Altuve - yes, Correa - maybe, Bregman - not there yet, and Springer - no, but I get the underlying sentiment of your point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Willing to wait it out till the end of the year, but there was no way I was in favor of moving a platinum glove guy off of third base. My gut says at the end of this season he's above average at best at SS. JMHO I think Buck gave in because Manny wants to be there and he's earned the shot I guess? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at his +/- from 2016 he is good straight on average to the left  -3 to the right. Good on FB. I think with more experience and positioning his range improves some but I doubt  he'll ever be much more than a +5 SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, elgordo said:

Looking at his +/- from 2016 he is good straight on average to the left  -3 to the right. Good on FB. I think with more experience and positioning his range improves some but I doubt  he'll ever be much more than a +5 SS.

Good news is he will NOT be in NY next year. No way they are going to spend a bunch of money on him when they have their own young guys coming up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
    • I say this as someone who defended Cowser like 2 posts ago, but like his fWAR number is entirely dependent on how much you're buying his defense.  I can totally buy the argument that maybe OAA is overrating him a bit, so he's not really on pace to be a 5.5 win player.  The OAA number is pretty eye-popping.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...