Jump to content

Passan: Tanking Killing Baseball?


weams

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

What was the problem in the 70's, when the Orioles couldnt draw anyone?

Wild Bill Hagy scared off a lot of little kids?

Beats me actually........this is something I've long wondered.  Why didn't people come out to see the O's on a consistent basis when we were one of the top teams in all of baseball?    BB-Ref says we only averaged 13k fans per game in 1970 for example......seems like that would've been a good team to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Only thing I can think of was Memorial Stadium was a pain to get to.  No convenient highway access, they "stadium" parked you so you were stuck there and couldn't leave early if you chose to, etc.  People that lived in the city could take the bus I guess, but for folks who lived in the suburbs, it was a pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Part of it was there was a lot less entertainment sources back then as well. Now with TV shows/movies on demand (Netflix and on demand), video games, sports bars, craft breweries, outdoor activities/sports and other sport leagues with overlapping seasons, it's only going to be tougher for MLB to keep it's fan base excited about going out to games.

This is the heart of the issue right here - and it affects sports across the board.  NFL is losing interest, NBA/NHL have problems during the regular season, etc.

College revenue sports are not having as much of a problem because they have a student fanbase (and because they are running a vast employment racket)

This is also tied into (I think quixotic's) theory that the vanishing middle class drives people to find cheaper, easier means of entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They started the season in March.  That is what is wrong with attendance. You have games in March and have had half of April to add to it and of course attendance is down. Who wants to go to a game in cold rainy weather?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

This is the heart of the issue right here - and it affects sports across the board.  NFL is losing interest, NBA/NHL have problems during the regular season, etc.

College revenue sports are not having as much of a problem because they have a student fanbase (and because they are running a vast employment racket)

This is also tied into (I think quixotic's) theory that the vanishing middle class drives people to find cheaper, easier means of entertainment.

People have cut cable.  Maybe the first year they still go to the games.  But a couple years in you start to lose interest in the game when you never see it. I have said many times we have reached peak payroll.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, atomic said:

People have cut cable.  Maybe the first year they still go to the games.  But a couple years in you start to lose interest in the game when you never see it. I have said many times we have reached peak payroll.   

You did see the part where revenue has increased each year for the last decade right?  10B last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, atomic said:

People have cut cable.  Maybe the first year they still go to the games.  But a couple years in you start to lose interest in the game when you never see it. I have said many times we have reached peak payroll.   

Must have it more accessible online.

I do the radio feed because it is not in my budget to do the video feed.  But I am old enough to remember going go games and that drives my waning fandom.

To wit, people are relocating more than ever in America.  A good number of us on the board are not within driving distance of a game anymore.  I'd have to drive about eight hours to get there, and that's speeding and without any delays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, atomic said:

People have cut cable.  Maybe the first year they still go to the games.  But a couple years in you start to lose interest in the game when you never see it. I have said many times we have reached peak payroll.   

Offer in market streaming, cable needs MASN.  MASN doesn't need cable.

I'm moving soon and about 90% certain I'm cutting cable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You did see the part where revenue has increased each year for the last decade right?  10B last year.

It ain't coming from ticket sales though.

This may sound far fetched but I am dead serious about this -- extravagant ballparks and stadiums are obsolete.  That ridiculous thing they're building in LA?  It's going to be a business park that happens to have a stadium in it.  You can build a 5,000 seat stadium and with proper TV and streaming rights do just fine.  And you'd save a crap ton of money on building costs.  Except of course, many owners want us to pay for it in tax dollars.  (this is thankfully not the case for the LA stadium)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 25 Nuggets said:

It ain't coming from ticket sales though.

This may sound far fetched but I am dead serious about this -- extravagant ballparks and stadiums are obsolete.  That ridiculous thing they're building in LA?  It's going to be a business park that happens to have a stadium in it.  You can build a 5,000 seat stadium and with proper TV and streaming rights do just fine.  And you'd save a crap ton of money on building costs.  Except of course, many owners want us to pay for it in tax dollars.  (this is thankfully not the case for the LA stadium)

That was the point I was making, they don't really need folks attending games to make money anymore.

You can't simply say, attendance is down so payroll will be lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, esmd said:

Only thing I can think of was Memorial Stadium was a pain to get to.  No convenient highway access, they "stadium" parked you so you were stuck there and couldn't leave early if you chose to, etc.  

All you had to do was park in the lower lot behind the High School across the street, take the back roads South and end in Fells Point, enter The Horse You Came In On and ease you pain and have free popcorn. lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

That was the point I was making, they don't really need folks attending games to make money anymore.

You can't simply say, attendance is down so payroll will be lower.

Yeah - the elephant in the room is that we no longer live in a neighborhood based society.  People in general don't even know who lives two houses down the street. 

A typical day for a young adult is to wake up in a house shared by a couple of his or her acquaintances, go to work, come home, chat with his friends online, watch some viral videos, play some XBOX online or something, and procrastinate doing dishes or laundry until bedtime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Yeah - the elephant in the room is that we no longer live in a neighborhood based society.  People in general don't even know who lives two houses down the street. 

A typical day for a young adult is to wake up in a house shared by a couple of his or her acquaintances, go to work, come home, chat with his friends online, watch some viral videos, play some XBOX online or something, and procrastinate doing dishes or laundry until bedtime.

Does this count as chatting with friends online?

Cause I don't like all of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's plenty of factors - but I think when it comes down to it, income inequality is starting to catch up. Average people are making less and less in comparison to the cost of living each year - and going to a baseball game or having a cable package with the sports channel is starting to seem as an unnecessary luxury. If you aren't going to games and can't watch the games at home - you eventually tune out and lose interest in the sport.

Other industries are having the same problems. Movie theaters are having trouble bringing people in like they used to. The NFL has had its issues - I mean, the Ravens could hardly fill their stadium for what was basically a playoff game last year in weather that was similar to this April.

People would just rather stay at home and watch Netflix or another affordable entertainment option.

I know people always say that it's affordable to go to a game - tickets can be $10-15 and you can bring in food. I personally agree with that - because when I go to a game I'm living an dying on every pitch. Visiting Camden Yards is like church for me.

But, for a regular person who just wants to go to a baseball game on a nice summer day - I think part of the experience for them is the cool food, cold treats, and beer. Its ends up being stupid expensive - so they end up going to a craft brewery or something cheaper instead that is just as fun for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I agree, McCann C is decision number one. After that, against a reverse split guy I think you just start your best overall players. However, O'Hearn has such poor splits vs LHP and so little experience I can't imagine they start him. Adley DH would allow Hyde to avoid the O'Hearn vs LHP decision. Kjerstad had hit lefties well but they gave him only 18 AB. That is a big ask of a rookie. Might be Adley if they think McCann makes Burnes better. Definite starters: Gunnar, Westburg, Santander, Mountcastle, Urias, Cowser Probable: Mullins Pick two: Adley, McCann, O'Hearn, Kjerstad  
    • What you said here is what I’ve been trying to convey.  OAA and dWAR aren’t intended to measure the same thing.   They shouldn’t be mentioned together.  If Fangraphs took its FRV and Positional stats and added them together, then divided that number by 10ish to convert it from runs to wins, you’d have a stat to compare to dWAR.
    • I think Adley is the DH tomorrow. 
    • Nice job pointing out Ragans pitches better against righties than lefties: The Orioles put a heavy emphasis on the pitcher's splits over the hitter's split, so Mullins could very well start. Interestingly though, lefties BABIP was a unsustainable .345. Here's his pitch% and results against lefties this year. With this info, I think the Orioles very well may start Mullins instead of Slater. Now, will they start O'Hearn over Rivera at DH?
    • Nope I wanna see the guy with the better defense. Just pointing out that Slater’s only “advantage” is another liability. Plus, Reagan’s is a reverse splits guy. 
    • The late season partial revival was enough for BAL to finish 3rd MLB-wide to the Judge/Soto team and the Shohei/Mookie/Freddie one. Split up those first two and put another year on everybody else, and I like our shot to go 1st some season soon. Park effects, it is notable the FG readout gives the Orioles with a 250/315/435 line a fraction of a point edge in the 115 wRC+ tie for 3rd and 4th with the Diamondbacks, who posted a 263/337/440 line. Don't be dull, October Orange Machine.
    • Mullins has slashed .196/.228/.278/.506 against lefties this year. Slater has not had a great year overall and his September was terrible, but the Orioles really like platoon matchups. Plus, having Mullins speed and pop on the bench gives them options late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...