Jump to content

Richard Justice on the O"S


Deadwood Fan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

As far as I can tell Peter Angelos has two main sources of his wealth.   His law firm and the Orioles/MASN.    Why would he or his heirs want to give either up if they have interest in them?

Most of the time MLB teams get sold for one of a few reasons.   1) Divorce, 2)Bad money management from baseball or other businesses they have interests in 3) the heirs have no interest in the team

That does not seem to be the case with the Angelos.

Spiritof66 has opined several times that estate taxes may prevent the Angelos boys from being able to afford to keep the team.    He’s a corporate lawyer who knows more about those things than I do.     But based on Richard Justice’s report, I’m going to assume that the Angelos family has figured out a way to avoid having to sell the team for estate tax reasons.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ravens owner Biscotti (sp) and Plank should go in and blow PGA out of the water with an offer he can't refuse.

I heard that Under Armour isn't doing so hot lately though.  Might not be a good time for Plank.

Hey, if Under Armour tanks how are people in Maryland going to dress themselves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

So a large portion of his pre-baseball wealth was earned in 1992.  Not long at all before he bought the team.

Okay, so my choice of the word long was wrong, I get it, dont need a 2x4 to get the point across. :)

Still, my point remains, he made his original money before buying the Orioles. Not like he used the Orioles to launch his status into the lifestyles of the filthy rich and famous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Spiritof66 has opined several times that estate taxes may prevent the Angelos boys from being able to afford to keep the team.    He’s a corporate lawyer who knows more about those things than I do.     But based on Richard Justice’s report, I’m going to assume that the Angelos family has figured out a way to avoid having to sell the team for estate tax reasons.    

Given that there are 30+ lawyers on his payroll, and his not being blind about estates taxes, I firmly believe he would figure out a way.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

The Ravens owner Biscotti (sp) and Plank should go in and blow PGA out of the water with an offer he can't refuse.

I heard that Under Armour isn't doing so hot lately though.  Might not be a good time for Plank.

Hey, if Under Armour tanks how are people in Maryland going to dress themselves?

I didnt think Football owners could own a MLB team???????

I dont think Under Armour is tanking, just not enjoying the crazy profits that they have been

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter settled one of his large law suit representing 8700 steel worker, shipbuilder, etc in an asbestos suit in 1992. His take of the suit was reportedly 330m.   He put together a group  to buy the O's in 1993 for 173m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

Peter settled one of his large law suit representing 8700 steel worker, shipbuilder, etc in an asbestos suit in 1992. His take of the suit was reportedly 330m.   He put together a group  to buy the O's in 1993 for 173m.

So his money still had that Nouveau riche stink to it. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Does it really matter how "long"?

My point was, he was a millionaire before buying the Orioles.

 Name one owner in the past 50 years who WASN'T a millionaire before buying his team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

So his money still had that Nouveau riche stink to it. ?

From what I am reading he took his cases on a contingency basis.   Meaning he got nothing if he lost.   I'd say he earned his money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

From what I am reading he took his cases on a contingency basis.   Meaning he got nothing if he lost.   I'd say he earned his money.

I didn't say otherwise.

In fact I would say that, as a general rule, the Nouveau riche are more likely to have earned their money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is this a story? I know there was some speculation over the winter that Angelos was stripping the club down for sale before the Cobb and Cashner signings. Was there anything more concrete than that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Deadwood Fan said:

They all not allowed to in the same city. 

Actually, you can own both as long as they are in the same city/market.  Case in point, Peter Angelos actually tried to buy the Washington Redskins in 1998 and 1999.

Quote

Orioles majority owner Peter Angelos said yesterday he will consider bidding for the Washington Redskins again but wouldn't be likely to match the $800 million offer that won the first round of bidding.

Angelos, who said he dropped out of the first round at $625 million, said that an $800 million bid would leave the club strapped for cash once the debt service was paid on the team each year.

Quote

One potential problem for Angelos is the NFL stipulation that an NFL owner cannot own another sports team in another market that has other sports teams.

An owner can own another team in the same market or one in a market that didn't have another pro sports franchise.

That would start a debate about whether the Orioles are in the Washington market.

Angelos said he feels Washington and Baltimore have become one market, which would allow him to own the Redskins and Orioles under NFL rules.

Baltimore Sun, April 1999 http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1999-04-13/sports/9904130006_1_blind-bidding-majority-owner-peter-angelos-bidding-process

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Another successful all Oriole grid, 36 rarity points:
    • He was allowed to face LHP.  My post wasn’t disagreeing with your post.  I was saying that not only did we let him face LHP, we let him do so despite not having much success against LHP.  I was pushing back against the narrative that we needlessly platooned Cowser.  Not only did we not platoon him, there is a reasonable argument that we should have platooned more than we did. We needed to play one of Mullins and Cowser in CF. Cowser mostly got the call vs. LHP because he was much better against LHP in the first half of the year, but this flipped in the second half.
    • From Adley to Basallo, I think Elias has eight Bats I hope we get to see all take 600 PA simultaneously some season. Adley was born in 1998, and until he arrived Elias Orioles baseball was bad by design.    For flavor, leaders of those teams like 1994-1997 births Mullins, Santander, Hays and Mountcastle are all between 10th and 20th among bats born their year.   Your team might be drafting Jackson Holliday if they are your club's best players in a rebuild, unless you have great pitching, which...haha, we know Elias' game. MLB Baseball is mostly played by guys 24-32.    286 batters cleared 300 PA in 2024 - about 12% were 33 and up by Fangraphs seasonal age assignments, about 8% were 23 and down. This is just a once a year post, but looking at Bats born from Adley's 1998 to Basallo's 2004, here's how the Orioles achievements compare with MLB's best by rWAR. 1998 - Adley is 4th 1999 - Westburg is 9th, and Kjerstad is 33rd 2000 - Cowser is 16th 2001 - Gunnar is 1st, and Mayo is nearly last, having dug a deep hole in his initial PA.    Trivia - Darell Hernaiz one of the 3 beneath Mayo.    Noelvi Marte dead last also has a PED suspension, d'oh. 2003 - Holliday is 4th - Minnesota the last weekend he got himself out of negative WAR territory. 2004 - Basallo is n/a as Chourio alone has played MLB from that birth year.    Basallo did log the most high minors experience of the 2004 births during the 2024 season. In 2025, Gunnar enters the 24-32 range as Judge departs it.     Cowser's improvement after an off-season a story of comfort for Holliday and Mayo - can they approach his ~3.5 win contribution? Strong, young teams - doing this exercise highlighted Adley's Orioles a little younger than the Braves and all their famous contract extensions.    Acuna, Albies and Riley were all born the year before Adley.   On the AL side of the competition, Yordan and Kyle Tucker also 1997 holding up a strong competitor, though not one that is young anymore.     Judge and Gerrit hoping Soto please stays.    Soto from 1998 - you have to reach back to 1994 for Correa, Bregman and C. Seager to find anyone ahead of him.
    • The Orioles have a lot of flexibility both in terms of prospects, money and potential veterans that hold value. Vets - I could see the Orioles moving on from any of Mountcastle, Mullins, Urias, or O'Hearn. These players may hold the most potential to bullpen upgrades. Money - The Orioles will certainly spend this offseason and that more flexibility than they have had.  I would like to see 1 or 2 extensions, 1 high profile FA, and maybe 1 more solid addition. Prospects - I could see any of the big 4 going somewhere.  I really think the Orioles and Pirates match up really well.  The Pirates have a plethora of young pitchers and the Orioles have young hitters.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the two match up.
    • The hitting philosophy works. That’s why they have been winning the last two years.     Plenty of runs scoring off HR’s in the playoffs. 
    • They would probably want two of Mayo, Basallo, Holliday, and Kjerstad, plus other pieces (likely at least one good pitching prospect, so someone like Povich or McDermott), for both Crochet and Robert.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...