Jump to content

Orioles to be more active in International Free Agent Market


NCRaven

Recommended Posts

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

If they traded for this money with no intention of spending it,  it might be the stupidest move the Orioles have ever made and that's saying a lot.  

If the Orioles are somehow sold, it'll be a miracle.  

I agree, but maybe the Angelos' weren't showing their hand at the time, and DD thought he was making brilliant moves, but once he helped cut payroll they let him go and now that slot money isn't relevant.    As far as being sold, all the signs seem to suggest similar patterns a team would have if they were getting ready to be sold.  No rush to hire FO people, gutting the franchise, shedding money, lack of communication to fanbase (nothing outside the ordinary, but I wouldn't release a lot of info if I was trying to sell either), reluctance to spend money moving forward, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 631
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’ll be radical and say no.   It depends how good they think the Mesa brothers are.    But the market value of many international players is far below their actual value due to the artificial spending limits.    

Well 3 months ago, they were all in.  They traded for slot money and wanted to get in on VVM and VMJ.  They must have liked them enough at some point to stockpile enough money to be able to outspend everyone else.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScGO's said:

I am starting to wonder if they were going to spend this money at all. I wonder if the plan all along was to cut the budget as low as possible to get the team ready to sell.

Getting Mesa would have been nice, but its 6 mil they would have had to spend, and the goal might be to not spend another dime until this team is gutted and sold.

My guess is that Givens, Bundy, Cashner, and Cobb will be pushed hard this offseason in trade talks.  We might not even get much back, it could all be salary dumps at this point.  I also wonder if they are in talks with Davis on a buyout already.  

If this is the case, then I can't be too bummed on all these non-moves because we could be free from the Angelos' by the start of next season.

My only hope left is the Angelos family sells the team to someone local who wants to bring a championship to Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was one that said that money talks, and I don't think I was wrong.  The Marlins went out and got more money to be able to match or exceed the Orioles.  And all things being equal, yeah, they were going to choose Miami.  Our only shot was to have a bigger wallet than everyone else and throw it all at them - which was rendered moot by the Marlins' maneuvers.

They better at least get Gaston.  If they don't, the Gausman deal is an absolute fleecing by Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

How do I know?   But the narrative that the trade was dictated by ownership isn’t very plausible IMO and there’s been no reporting that this was the reason — so I don’t want people reading these posts to get the impression that it’s a reported fact.   It often happens here that theories get repeated a few times here and then readers start assuming that we’re discussing something that’s established as a fact, when it’s not.    

What a second.

There is a bit of a misunderstanding here.

What I said, and what other have also said, is that we think that International spending was capped at a lower level than the total slots Dan traded for plus the slots the O's already had.

That is a far cry from saying Dan was ordered to trade slot money away.

My personal belief is Dan traded away the excess like he has every other year.

I think that theory is plausible given the prior actions of both Dan and ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, esmd said:

I was one that said that money talks, and I don't think I was wrong.  The Marlins went out and got more money to be able to match or exceed the Orioles.  And all things being equal, yeah, they were going to choose Miami.  Our only shot was to have a bigger wallet than everyone else and throw it all at them - which was rendered moot by the Marlins' maneuvers.

They better at least get Gaston.  If they don't, the Gausman deal is an absolute fleecing by Atlanta.

Yeah, all things equal.  

But the Mesas had to have preferred Miami over Baltimore in the first place to say "Hey, we want to play here, we just want more money.  Do what you need to do to make some trades and get more and we'll sign here."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mitch Connor said:

Is there any other talent available to get? Just wondering if the international money that we acquired thru trades is now wasted.

power pitcher Sandy Gaston. Sky high ceiling. 16 years old. A good arm to add to the system. second highest rated prospect available behind VVM.

Touches high 90s and has developing secondaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old proverb says you reap what you sow. Years of neglecting the international market isn't always going to be overcome by offering slightly more money. Especially when Victor Mesa Sr. was in the Miami camp. I hope they are able to learn from this and be more active going forward. Rebuilds are hard and frustrating with more defeats than victories. I'm buying multiple orange tinted shades to help through the next few (hopefully) years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mitch Connor said:

Is there any other talent available to get? Just wondering if the international money that we acquired thru trades is now wasted.

Beyond Gaston, It is difficult to say from a fan’s distance. The conventional wisdom is that all the top talent this year was snapped up soon after Jul 2, with the exception of course of the Cubans defecting out of season or in Sandy's case failing a PED test. But these talent evaluations are being made on 16-17 year olds (and in most cases younger when the “deal” was actually unofficially made).  So there is always the case of “late” bloomers showing up. Also, this year MLB banned teams from signing players from the Mexican League, which had become a back door way of signing young talent that bypassed some of the restrictions. So there might be some promising talent locked up there that could free itself up in various ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Thato'sfan said:

power pitcher Sandy Gaston. Sky high ceiling. 16 years old. A good arm to add to the system. second highest rated prospect available behind VVM.

Touches high 90s and has developing secondaries.

You mean out of what was left on Oct 20th.

Gaston was rated 14th on a list without VVM back in July.

https://www.mlb.com/news/july-2-international-prospects-signing-tracker/c-283495622

Baseball America had him at 24 on a list that included VVM.

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/where-the-top-50-mlb-international-prospects-have-agreed-to-sign/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chavez Ravine said:

Beyond Gaston, It is difficult to say from a fan’s distance. The conventional wisdom is that all the top talent this year was snapped up soon after Jul 2, with the exception of course of the Cubans defecting out of season or in Sandy's case failing a PED test. But these talent evaluations are being made on 16-17 year olds (and in most cases younger when the “deal” was actually unofficially made).  So there is always the case of “late” bloomers showing up. Also, this year MLB banned teams from signing players from the Mexican League, which had become a back door way of signing young talent that bypassed some of the restrictions. So there might be some promising talent locked up there that could free itself up in various ways.

 

Fernando Villalobos is a top 50 name.  Can't have too many catchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'll take one from Jim Palmer, who in the Spring og 1979 said, this team will be lucky to finish 4th
    • I’m ok with Slater but I think they need to get a RHH or two that are better than Mountcastle.
    • Actually what Elias said supports my comment very well. Melewski:  One potential critique for the offense is the Orioles are too reliant on the home runs and slugging.  Moving forward do you think that Is a valid critique?  Does there need to be more variety? Whether its on base or other ways to score? Elias: I definite experienced the frustration of that.  Who didn't.  I've been around baseball and a lot of the very best information out there in baseball my entire life and career. And getting hits, getting RBI with runners in scoring position.  There is a lot of evidence that can be hard to control on a year over year month to month basis. Its a tricky thing,  Hitting. That said I am going to behave like it is under our control and we are going to examine everything about our offensive approach, teachings, the mix of personnel, the kind of things that you mentioned.  And put ourselves in position to where we feel like we have addressed any shortcoming there. I don't necessarily believe its all chance.  I do think there are things our organization, and ultimately our players will be able to do to improve our odds on that front.   It's not a good experience going through that for months.  Where we are struggling to get runs in from second base.  That was not the case last year.  We were great at it.  With a lot of the same guys.  I have a lot of confidence that can correct next year.   Its going to involve some work by us. --------- Then his actions were to let the hitting coaches go. You can listen his answer here:  Scroll to 27.24    
    • Yeah but this goes for all the young guys, you only will get better with playing time and experience. He was the #2 pick in the draft and 1B/DH is currently occupied by Mounty and O’Hearn. We need Heston to hold down RF for at least one season.  As for the RHH, I think Slater is our guy. I saw something that he’s had the most pinch hits in mlb over the last 3-4 seasons.  That’s valuable in his role with all of the LHH we have. Even with his career worst 1st half, he still put up a .700+ OPS with us vs LHP.  With the new WC rules, and all these teams competing, I just expect everyone to be looking to buy, or at least “not sell”. I expect a thin market for buying. 
    • It's a .500 team. A starting rotation right now of Efflin, GRod (if healthy), Kremer, Povich, Rogers (?). Pretty much the same lineup that struggled for 3+ months. An above average bullpen, maybe awesome if Bautista comes back in form.  I'm guessing it's going to be a frustrating year without acquiring upgrades in the offseason. 
    • I do …Hate the Yankees and Red Sox with a passion 
    • 🤣 Ok …Kjerstad looks shaky on most every play. He’s been an OF for what  15 years. I just think he’s one of those guys that is who he is defensively. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...