Jump to content

Bucks recent comments


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Quote
 
“I’m just excited about getting the good, talented players and leading them in the right direction to put together something special here again.”

This is from Rochs article this morning.

I am starting to think that Dan and Buck are going to be retained. If the new acting leadership is being honest Dad has been the real problem for more than a decade.

If I had to chose one it would be Duquette, but I'm okay with Buck being here for a couple more season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They’re both talking as though they’ll be here, and that’s how they should be talking IMO.     But I don’t think it necessarily means they’ve been told they’ll be back.   

I agree but I think they have. No one in their right mind would let an outgoing GM have a sell off in my opinion. Dan talked about having a plan moving forward. I doubt he would've done that if there wasn't an understanding about his job security. With Buck he just sounds like he's spoken to Dan.

All speculation that John or Lou should put to rest if they are intent on keeping these guys IMO

Nothing will happen between now and the end of the season that should change anything. As much as you don't want to lose, getting the 1st pick in the draft is the best option. Over modest improvement in the record by a bunch of guys that mostly have nothing to do in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure announcing an extension for Buck while he's in the midst of one of the worst seasons in Major League history is a solid marketing tool.  

Let the season end, announce that Duke is coming back.  Then let Duke decide whether Buck returns, and if so, Duke makes that announcement.  By that time the "regular" fan base will take it as positive offseason news and will be excited to see how they handle the offseason.  

I'm of the impression they both should be replaced, but that said, they both were part of turning this franchise around, and if Duke truly has the power now, then I'd be okay with them both returning IF that decision is Duquette's to make. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Whoa, a levelheaded intelligent response.

I agree, 100%.  

Yeah, Frobby has been polluting this board with that "levelheaded, responsible" crap for way too long now.  Makes it hard to get a good torches and pitchforks mob started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

This is from Rochs article this morning.

I am starting to think that Dan and Buck are going to be retained. If the new acting leadership is being honest Dad has been the real problem for more than a decade.

If I had to chose one it would be Duquette, but I'm okay with Buck being here for a couple more season.

Maybe he will be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember reading Buck was thinking of retiring after his contract expires 2018, a few years ago. Looks like he's having second thoughts. I dont really care except for the "favoritism to vets" thing, I dont think it has been a problem because no prospect are really forcing their way onto the team yet.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

They’re both talking as though they’ll be here, and that’s how they should be talking IMO.     But I don’t think it necessarily means they’ve been told they’ll be back.   

I think you are right, particularly in Buck's case. I think Buck has to go for his good and for the good of the organization. He had a great run, but it is over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How can you possibly have back to back last place finishes with the second being a franchise worst and extend the Manager and GM?

When those seasons are the fault of the owner and not the GM and manager, probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, interloper said:

When those seasons are the fault of the owner and not the GM and manager, probably.

I think we all agree that Duquette's hands have been tied until recently. So it's really hard to judge his performance when he was probably being undermined and wasn't calling the shots up until a few months ago. 

Buck, on the other hand, has made plenty of bad managerial decisions over the last few years. Shunning Kim, continuing to play "his" guys (Tillman, Davis, etc.), and moving Manny to SS. Those were all bad decisions that hurt this team. Yes he did some good, but it's abundantly clear that ship has sailed. Thank him for his service and send him on his way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I think we all agree that Duquette's hands have been tied until recently. So it's really hard to judge his performance when he was probably being undermined and wasn't calling the shots up until a few months ago. 

Buck, on the other hand, has made plenty of bad managerial decisions over the last few years. Shunning Kim, continuing to play "his" guys (Tillman, Davis, etc.), and moving Manny to SS. Those were all bad decisions that hurt this team. Yes he did some good, but it's abundantly clear that ship has sailed. Thank him for his service and send him on his way. 

While I agree with you on his bad decisions, I think it's unfair to omit the countless brilliant coaching decisions he's made during his time here.  And as for Manny to SS, I assumed that was a direction from the front office to hopefully increase his trade value.  Everyone knew what he could do at third, show he's good at short, too.  Didn't really work out, but it could have been more damaging to move him back than to play up the narrative of the learning curve to get back to his level of defense.

All that said, I do think it's time to move on from Buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...