Jump to content

Winter Trade Value


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

One possible plan that Elias could seek to employ is to trade veteran players this winter.
Players such as Bundy, Villar, Cobb, Cashner, and Mancini (among others) could merit consideration.
I understand that Elias could wait and consider dealing them later, however, in this exercise, what trade value would you assign each were they to be dealt this winter? 
How would their trade value compare to players that we dealt at the deadline this year?
One example: Is Bundy's value similar to Gausman's?

Thanks all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bundy's Value is down right now but some Team may see something the Old Regime didn't (which is what I am hoping the new Management will do). So At this point I would say the Bundy's Value is similar to Gausmans maybe A little better.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect he will try to trade everyone. It will be interesting to see if he trades players for the best offer he can get before the season starts, or holds out if the offers are not sufficient. Will he eat half or more of Trumbo's salary to get rid of him?

I have no idea how other teams value of our players. Cobb's second half should make him tradeable, but there isn't much excess value to be had, if any. Mancini is the most interesting one for me. He's still fairly young and inexpensive. There might be a team or two out there that thinks they can turn him into someone special. 

Bundy was horrible last year. I don't see how he could be worth as much as Gausman was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, jem709 said:

Bundy's Value is down right now but some Team may see something the Old Regime didn't (which is what I am hoping the new Management will do). So At this point I would say the Bundy's Value is similar to Gausmans maybe A little better.

 

 

I agree with you that trading Bundy this Winter would likely be a poor decision.  I also agree that with Elias in charge, the new staff may be able to improve the performances of players, like Bundy, thus making their value notably higher.  We'll all know how the new regime will operate... quite soon. I know I'm amped to see it unfold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Greg Pappas said:

I also agree that with Elias in charge, the new staff may be able to improve the performances of players

I'm very much looking forward to the fresh sets of eyes looking over our current guys.  How many players have we let go recently, only to have another team's coaching staff make minor adjustments, and suddenly those players are having success again...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jem709 said:

Bundy's Value is down right now but some Team may see something the Old Regime didn't (which is what I am hoping the new Management will do). So At this point I would say the Bundy's Value is similar to Gausmans maybe A little better.

 

 

Injury history he is not worth what Kevin is.  He may never be well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

Yeah... it'll be interesting to see how Elias goes about things.

What I really mean is Bundy could show up in February with a calcified shoulder and not pitch as a downside. That is the floor for his value. He could blow out an achilles. He could need a Tommy John revision. That is why they always say a season too soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weams said:

What I really mean is Bundy could show up in February with a calcified shoulder and not pitch as a downside. That is the floor for his value. He could blow out an achilles. He could need a Tommy John revision. That is why they always say a season too soon. 

I understand.  It's one of the reasons it's feasible to see Elias deal Bundy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jem709 said:

Ooops That would be Pitcher

With of course that baggage still there... with everyone waiting for the second half or shoe to drop. His value is close to apex as far as I am concerned and he does cost a bit of money now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is untouchable and I'm sure Elias will ask around.

That said, I think everyone listed in the OP except Cashner is more likely to see their value increase than decrease between now and July. 

Whether we take whatever we can get now or wait for a possible better return likely depends on a) what offers we're getting, and b) which guys Elias and crew think they can fix up themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes sense to make a trade, you do it. The only players that really should be moved are immovable. You can eat half of Trumbos contract but no one will take him. You could eat 3/4 of Davis’ contract and no one will take him. Other than those two it makes more sense to just keep who’s already here unless it’s a pure salary dump. You aren’t getting anything decent for Bundy or Villar. You may as well just keep them and hope they play well enough for a mid season trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
    • I think of it differently.   I think keeping the  top 4 prospects in Holliday, Kjerstad, Mayo and Basallo  will influence who the O's add.   These 4 are keepers to build around for the next 6 years.   They will help keep the payroll low while providing improving performance. A year ago the O's had a surplus of position players in the top levels of the organization.    Elias decided to trade Joey Ortiz,  Norby, Stowers, Hovath, Etzel and Billy Cook to fill holes.    This thined out the prospects at the higher levels.   So I don't see the top four being traded for many years.   They will become part of the O's core players at the major league level IMO.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...