Jump to content

How long does your blank check for Elias last?


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

I can see why people would say a WS win would solidify him as an elite GM but as pointed out the playoffs are a crap shoot. Elias isn’t at fault if the pitching craps the bed or if the bats go cold. 
 

He already is elite. He’s stocked this franchise with more good young talent than we could have hoped. As long as the Orioles keep making the playoffs and as long as he keeps good talent coming through the system that’s what he’ll be judged on. In addition to being at the vanguard of how to pick up guys like O’Hearn, etc., that’s important too. 

I agree, I am merely pointing out that without some post season success, he will not compare as favorably to the absolute top of the Orioles best GMs.   Sorta like Gunnar’s season shows he is an elite player this season, but you’re still not comparing his season to Ohtani’s. 
 

Nevertheless, he is unquestionably the best in the Angelo’s era  and I see no reason he can’t ascend to the mountain top if he stays 3-5 more years  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Is that the assumption we’re operating with now? Why would you think that?

If Houston has any correlation, they were dead last in MLB payroll when tanking for 3 years under Lehnow, Elias was there. 
 

In 2016 they had a year like we had in 2022 and in that offseason their payroll moved from 30th to 18th mainly due to arb costs. 
 

In 2017 (hopefully like us) they had the first of three straight 100 plus seasons .. so what did that do to their budget?  They went from 18th to 11th to 8th to 4th by the peak of that first wave. 
 

No doubt Elias went all through this in detail with John before he was even hired and has gone over it through the rebuild years hopefully already achieved a general understanding about the coming wave seasons and budget necessities 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

If Elias is already on a profit sharing plan then maybe he does want to keep a low payroll.

Don't forget the year-end bonus, no doubt partially based on overall profitability. 

This is meant as a joke, but sports fans assume that the W-L record is the only thing motivating a team's FO and they shouldn't.   In many important respects a sports team is a business just like any other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Is that the assumption we’re operating with now? Why would you think that?

Not any assumption.  More a guess.    I think Elias is pretty smart.  In 2018 he was hired by promoting the plan to cut veteran salaries and go with a youth movement  of cheap players.   If Elias is that smart why would he not be smart enough to agree to have his compensation tied to a profit sharing plan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

If Houston has any correlation, they were dead last in MLB payroll when tanking for 3 years under Lehnow, Elias was there. 

In 2016 they had a year like we had in 2022 and in that offseason their payroll moved from 30th to 18th mainly due to arb costs. 

In 2017 (hopefully like us) they had the first of three straight 100 plus seasons .. so what did that do to their budget?  They went from 18th to 11th to 8th to 4th by the peak of that first wave. 
 

No doubt Elias went all through this in detail with John before he was even hired and has gone over it through the rebuild years hopefully already achieved a general understanding about the coming wave seasons and budget necessities 

I have no reason to think Elias and John Angelos reviewed in detail, or have have any clear, common understanding about, future budgets, player payroll or retention of homegrown talent, other than maybe the mutual recognition that at some point payroll will have to increase. Nor do I have any reason to believe they have any mutual understanding about those things. Even if they do, to borrow an old phrase, I don't think a general understanding with John Angelos is worth the paper it's not written on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I have no reason to think Elias and John Angelos reviewed in detail, or have have any clear, common understanding about, future budgets, player payroll or retention of homegrown talent, other than maybe the mutual recognition that at some point payroll will have to increase. Nor do I have any reason to believe they have any mutual understanding about those things. Even if they do, to borrow an old phrase, I don't think a general understanding with John Angelos is worth the paper it's not written on.

You would have a difficult time being the Orioles GM.  In fact, you couldn’t be with that belief.

I believe Elias has very different thoughts than you do about JA and acts in a way consistent with what appears to date to be a very mutually agreed upon path working for him. 

In other words, Elias operates in the real world, not a fantasy one. 
 

Edited by tntoriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I have no reason to think Elias and John Angelos reviewed in detail, or have have any clear, common understanding about, future budgets, player payroll or retention of homegrown talent, other than maybe the mutual recognition that at some point payroll will have to increase. Nor do I have any reason to believe they have any mutual understanding about those things. Even if they do, to borrow an old phrase, I don't think a general understanding with John Angelos is worth the paper it's not written on.

So you think Elias when interviewed by JA just said “Oh trust me, we will figure it out?”
 

Or perhaps he was thoroughly prepared, presented his experience in detail and outlined his thoughts and plans and process to rebuild and beyond ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today BAL is 24th of the 30 Clubs in Wins since play began in 2019.     It'll be interesting to see how far these Adley teams can climb the AL ladder the next four or more years.

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&month=0&ind=0&team=0%2Cts&startdate=&enddate=&season1=2019&season=2023&sortcol=2&sortdir=default&pagenum=1

2019-present, we are already ahead of DET-KCR.

Teams to leap frog next year:

-trail TEX by 3 games, trail LAA by 5 games, trail OAK by 14 games, trail CHW by 27 games

Teams to leap frog by end of 2025

-trail BOS by 40 games

Those projected achievements would get Elias' Club to 8th of the 15 AL Clubs for 2019-2025.     How deep he took the dive helped how high it can fly.   

Elias and Adley in time, if we are lucky, becomes a Belichick and Brady kind of thing.     If the Start Time is instead Adley's MLB debut, as managed by Elias, its already ATL-LAD-HOU-BAL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tntoriole said:

So you think Elias when interviewed by JA just said “Oh trust me, we will figure it out?”
 

Or perhaps he was thoroughly prepared, presented his experience in detail and outlined his thoughts and plans and process to rebuild and beyond ? 

Not at all. I obviously don't know what happened, but my guess is that Elias explained what the Astros had done and said he could build the Orioles through a similar strategy. I have no doubt he was very well prepared and ready to go through his plan in meticculous detail, with salary estimates (this was in the waning years of the old CBA), recommendations for building out the analytics and international infrastructures. But I wouldn't venture a guess as to how much of that he presented to Angelos, or how much of that Angelos would have understood. My point was that I question whether there was any commitment or agreement reached about what will happen with the payroll when it's no longer a team dominated by pre-arbitration guys, or about adding payroll by signing or trading for veteran players, and even if there was I would not count on Angelos to live up to it. Maybe I'm wrong. I hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Not at all. I obviously don't know what happened, but my guess is that Elias explained what the Astros had done and said he could build the Orioles through a similar strategy. I have no doubt he was very well prepared and ready to go through his plan in meticculous detail, with salary estimates (this was in the waning years of the old CBA), recommendations for building out the analytics and international infrastructures. But I wouldn't venture a guess as to how much of that he presented to Angelos, or how much of that Angelos would have understood. My point was that I question whether there was any commitment or agreement reached about what will happen with the payroll when it's no longer a team dominated by pre-arbitration guys, or about adding payroll by signing or trading for veteran players, and even if there was I would not count on Angelos to live up to it. Maybe I'm wrong. I hope so.

The only public evidence I see is that John Angelos has given Elias and his team virtually complete autonomy in the rebuilding and hiring and decisions since he came on board. 
 

Don’t get me wrong.. JA has significant personality flaws evident in his public statements, lease negotiations, KB situation, media relations etc … however, if a new owner like a Bisciotti type had come in here in 2018 and hired Elias, then this board right now would be singing the new owner’s praises as the best owner ever. 
 

We have had the painful experience of living with the old man for decades and all that stuff colors our perception of JA.  But Elias came with no such baggage at all and perhaps John also would like to be a bit different than the old man. 
 

Either way, it seems to date to me anyway that Elias was a great choice by JA and he has given him almost total autonomy in the rebuilding.  And the son gets credit from me for that.  
 

Can this sour? Oh sure!! Will it be about money? Probably. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...