Jump to content

Will Roch actually ask his questions?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Rene88 said:

I am disappointed the OH is taking jabs at Roch who works very hard at his job. How about some more criticism of Jim Hunter who literally makes watching a game torture with his homerism?

I will say this, I think we will see sooner than later how much power Elias has with all hires throughout the org. Do we have more Joe Angel types (talented and unbiased) or more Jim Hunter and Bordick types. A good GM would have influence on those things even if they don't hire them directly. 

No one is saying Roch doesn't work hard.  I like Roch.  I think everyone likes Roch.  It's not a question about how hard he works, it's that he's only given so much information and/or only allowed to reveal so much.  He AND Jim Hunter are both paid to be positive, etc.  Roch and Hunter will never ask hard hitting questions because...well, Jon Miller can tell you all about being paid by the team and being critical of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t really want to single Roch out.    But it seems fair to ask, if he’s going to write a blog identifying the pertinent questions, shouldn’t he then be asking those questions?

Of course Meoli, Ghiroli and whoever else is at the “introduction” should be asking these questions too.    

I think we need to stop expecting Roch to be asking the hard questions. He is a blogger for MASN. That role inherently does not allow him the freedom to be a tough journalist. We should look to The Sun, 105.7, national reporters, and basically anyone else for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ScGO's said:

I wonder if Elias could use analytics to figure out how to fix Davis?  I'm sure it doesn't always work like that though...

I'm very interested in seeing how he handles scouting.  Hopefully tons of hires.  How do I apply?

My next big interest is what he thinks of our 40 man roster and our current milb system.  

Another question I would ask too, does he have any ideas on how to use the current intl money?

You can warp the Davis question up in as many fancy analytics as you'd like, it'll come down to the old baseball adage, Hit 'em where they aint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Rene88 said:

I am disappointed the OH is taking jabs at Roch who works very hard at his job. How about some more criticism of Jim Hunter who literally makes watching a game torture with his homerism?

I will say this, I think we will see sooner than later how much power Elias has with all hires throughout the org. Do we have more Joe Angel types (talented and unbiased) or more Jim Hunter and Bordick types. A good GM would have influence on those things even if they don't hire them directly. 

The problem I have with Roch is that I feel like he presents himself as a reporter, but he's really just a PR man in disguise for the team. And the only reason that we and the rest of the media even pay him any attention is because the Angelos family has such a contentious relationship with the Baltimore Sun that no one else seems to have access to them. So we're left with trying to dissect the morsels that Roch shares on behalf of the propaganda machine. 

And the difference between Roch and Jim Hunter is that I can see the game with my own eyes and make my own informed decision (regardless of what Hunter says). We can't do the same with Roch. I personally don't read his blog or follow him at all and I think everyone else would be wise to the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, theocean said:

I think we need to stop expecting Roch to be asking the hard questions. He is a blogger for MASN. That role inherently does not allow him the freedom to be a tough journalist. We should look to The Sun, 105.7, national reporters, and basically anyone else for that.

The problem is stations like 105.7 present Roch as their "Orioles Expert". And the Orioles are so insignificant on the national level that they don't seem to get much attention. Certainly not as much as the winning and/or big market teams. So we're left to get our news from a glorified PR man. It's a great situation for the team, because they can have Roch spew whatever propaganda they want and hardly anyone will question. It's a shame we don't have a legitimate local beat writer who follows the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

The problem I have with Roch is that I feel like he presents himself as a reporter, but he's really just a PR man in disguise for the team. And the only reason that we and the rest of the media even pay him any attention is because the Angelos family has such a contentious relationship with the Baltimore Sun that no one else seems to have access to them. So we're left with trying to dissect the morsels that Roch shares on behalf of the propaganda machine. 

And the difference between Roch and Jim Hunter is that I can see the game with my own eyes and make my own informed decision (regardless of what Hunter says). We can't do the same with Roch. I personally don't read his blog or follow him at all and I think everyone else would be wise to the same. 

I think they could replace Roch with a social media savvy recent journalism graduate and things would continue to move along just fine.  Might even be an improvement if their Twitter game is on point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll ask again, how do you guys think Elias would respond to those questions? There's a 99.9% probability that he would be very positive and fairly circumspect. It would be really stupid to say anything contentious or negative at the introductory press conference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the questions did get asked.    Kudos to the media members who attended, they did their job.   

I thought of another question today — will the way in which the O’s conduct medical evaluations change?    Is that within Elias’ purview?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
    • I think of it differently.   I think keeping the  top 4 prospects in Holliday, Kjerstad, Mayo and Basallo  will influence who the O's add.   These 4 are keepers to build around for the next 6 years.   They will help keep the payroll low while providing improving performance. A year ago the O's had a surplus of position players in the top levels of the organization.    Elias decided to trade Joey Ortiz,  Norby, Stowers, Hovath, Etzel and Billy Cook to fill holes.    This thined out the prospects at the higher levels.   So I don't see the top four being traded for many years.   They will become part of the O's core players at the major league level IMO.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...