Jump to content

Will Elias trade this off season or at the trade deadline


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I found it interesting that when Jeff Luhnow took over the Astros in the fall of 2011 he did not trade away most of his veteran assets.  In fact he traded for Lowrie to be his SS.  It wasn't until the trade deadline that Luhnow made several trades to low his payroll.  

What will Elias do?   Trumbo and Cashner probably can't be moved until the trade deadline if then without eating salary.  Cobb and Bleier could be traded as soon as they show they are healthy.   Givens did not have a great season in 2018 but his value may still be quite high because of this stuff.  When and whether Bundy is traded is a good question.  He didn't have a good season but he did pitch very well until late June when he injured himself on the base paths.  Villar  could probably be traded this off season and get some value in return. Mancini is still cheap but his age means he probably gets traded before the O's are contenders again.

Elias may want to see how some of these players do with more analytic data.   Maybe they can improve and increase their value.

Elias' opening statement talked about trusting in the process.  The process with the Astros was to trade veterans for young players to improve the number and qualify of prospects in the farm system.   I would think this will happen at some point with the O's.   The question is when will that happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I found it interesting that when Jeff Luhnow took over the Astros in the fall of 2011 he did not trade away most of his veteran assets.  In fact he traded for Lowrie to be his SS.  It wasn't until the trade deadline that Luhnow made several trades to low his payroll.  

What will Elias do?   Trumbo and Cashner probably can't be moved until the trade deadline if then without eating salary.  Cobb and Bleier could be traded as soon as they show they are healthy.   Givens did not have a great season in 2018 but his value may still be quite high because of this stuff.  When and whether Bundy is traded is a good question.  He didn't have a good season but he did pitch very well until late June when he injured himself on the base paths.  Villar  could probably be traded this off season and get some value in return. Mancini is still cheap but his age means he probably gets traded before the O's are contenders again.

Elias may want to see how some of these players do with more analytic data.   Maybe they can improve and increase their value.

Elias' opening statement talked about trusting in the process.  The process with the Astros was to trade veterans for young players to improve the number and qualify of prospects in the farm system.   I would think this will happen at some point with the O's.   The question is when will that happen?

Concerning the potential midseason trades, I'm hoping we put a premium focus on defense.  Let's make our pitchers look as nice and shiny as we can for their trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks need to understand the Astroball process.  It was certainly not simply trading veterans for young players.  It was about attempting to create the most advanced player evaluation system (taking into account historical probabilities of similar players and similar skill sets, scouts opinions, injury likelikhood, etc.) for all players - high school, college, minors and MLB.  Other advanced data spoke to hitting or defensive traits or weaknesses of players.  I expect our new front office will make a trade at any time that will improve the long term prospect of the organization.  For now, given our competitive situation, yes, I would expect us to deal veterans and their contracts for prospects.  It is my opinion that relievers are a valued currency in today's game and our front office has the best chance to obtain prospect value by finding quality relievers to trade during the season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, canonfaz said:

I'm hoping we see a noticeable improvement in Bundy, Cashner, and Cobb during the season and are able to get a better haul for them at the deadline. I don't think any of them have much value right now. 

Cobb pitched well in the second half and frankly I expect that from him.    Cashner is a mediocre pitcher (which is different from a horrible pitcher) who can probably do a little better than last year but I’m not expecting huge improvement.   

Bundy is the interesting one.   I still hold out hope for a breakout from him.   We’ve seen stretches of 8-10 games where he dominates.    I think with a little analytical help and targeted managing and coaching he still could make a huge leap forward.    But there’s no guarantee it happens.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cobb should be by no means traded this winter. 

1. His value is at its lowest

2. Someone has to pitch

3. Someone has to show they are ready to fill the void.

I'm not against trading Cobb or Cashner, but not until they have their replacements identified. This team only has 3 starters penciled in as it is, so they are going to have to already fill 2 spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I found it interesting that when Jeff Luhnow took over the Astros in the fall of 2011 he did not trade away most of his veteran assets.  In fact he traded for Lowrie to be his SS.  It wasn't until the trade deadline that Luhnow made several trades to low his payroll.  

What will Elias do?   Trumbo and Cashner probably can't be moved until the trade deadline if then without eating salary.  Cobb and Bleier could be traded as soon as they show they are healthy.   Givens did not have a great season in 2018 but his value may still be quite high because of this stuff.  When and whether Bundy is traded is a good question.  He didn't have a good season but he did pitch very well until late June when he injured himself on the base paths.  Villar  could probably be traded this off season and get some value in return. Mancini is still cheap but his age means he probably gets traded before the O's are contenders again.

Elias may want to see how some of these players do with more analytic data.   Maybe they can improve and increase their value.

Elias' opening statement talked about trusting in the process.  The process with the Astros was to trade veterans for young players to improve the number and qualify of prospects in the farm system.   I would think this will happen at some point with the O's.   The question is when will that happen?

I hope so. Happy Thanksgiving to all O's fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Cobb should be by no means traded this winter. 

1. His value is at its lowest

2. Someone has to pitch

3. Someone has to show they are ready to fill the void.

I'm not against trading Cobb or Cashner, but not until they have their replacements identified. This team only has 3 starters penciled in as it is, so they are going to have to already fill 2 spots.

From what I have read the Astros did not worry about  who was going to pitch or who was ready to fill a void for the first few season.  Their total focus was on building a team to win a championship.  That is why they lost over 100 for first two years after Luhnow arrived and 90 losses the  third year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, wildcard said:

From what I have read the Astros did not worry about  who was going to pitch or who was ready to fill a void for the first few season.  Their total focus was on building a team to win a championship.  That is why they lost over 100 for first two years after Luhnow arrived and 90 losses the  third year.

Most of if not any of the young pitchers are even ready. Do you risk ruining them and rushing them? Start their service clock years before they're ready to contend? Sign a bunch of veterans or just go with the veterans you already have. The team isn't going to be big players in free agency. They had alot coming off the book with a few more salaries coming off next year. Cobb isn't that expensive to where they should trade him Now, much less give him away now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

From what I have read the Astros did not worry about  who was going to pitch or who was ready to fill a void for the first few season.  Their total focus was on building a team to win a championship.  That is why they lost over 100 for first two years after Luhnow arrived and 90 losses the  third year.

That's what I took from that article you posted. EVERY deal is looking towards the future of the organization. If it puts us a pitcher short in the rotation or pen this year, so be it. The focus is building and developing the minors so that we can fill ML spots later from our minor league system. As the MiL system improves we have more and more spots filled at the ML level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be great to get an under the radar prospect like the Cubs did when they traded Cashner for Rizzo.  Don’t get me wrong, Rizzo was a top 100 guy, but there was a lot of criticism about him.  The Cubs saw something and then essentially built around him.  Who is our guy to build around?  Would be nice to have someone prior to the draft.  That way, the draft will just add a piece around the pillar.

Can we package Bundy, Cobb and Villar for a first piece?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...