Jump to content

Rumors and News


oriolediehard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 315
  • Created
  • Last Reply
13 minutes ago, Whammer said:

If healthy, I think Donaldson is the best 3B in MLB (yes, including Manny). He could do for ATL what Nelson Cruz did for us in 2014.

I’m a little surprised the Braves ponied up $23 mm for a guy who’s been injured a lot the last two years and will be 33 next year.  But as others have said, it’s a one-year deal so it can’t really mess them up long term.   And, if he is healthy and performs at prior levels he’ll be worth his contract and then some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Great move by the Braves. Donaldson's a potential lottery ticket if he can stay healthy and he can keep the seat warm for Austin Riley. I know the Astros have gotten quite a bit of praise for their rebuild, but I think the Braves are a close second. 

I like what Atlanta has done, but we haven't seen it work, yet, like we have in Houston. The Astros' rebuild led to a World Series and several years now of being amongst the best. Atlanta still has something to prove this year. They had a good year in 2018. They now need to build on that and seem to be on the right track to do just that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Great move by the Braves. Donaldson's a potential lottery ticket if he can stay healthy and he can keep the seat warm for Austin Riley. I know the Astros have gotten quite a bit of praise for their rebuild, but I think the Braves are a close second. 

Exactly what that team needs...a big right-handed stick in the middle of that lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, section18 said:

Atlanta has lost it. $23 million for a guy, Donaldson, that's injured all of the time. McCann is on the downside also and they gave him $2 mill. Donaldson still has to pass a physical.

They must have money to burn.

I think they do have money to burn and they're paying for Donaldson's upside (i.e., potential MVP candidate). It seems like a good fit for both the team and the player. It gives Donaldson a chance to prove himself and reassert his value and the Braves another dangerous bat in the lineup. I also don't see anything wrong with the McCann deal. The Nats just signed Suzuki to $10M for two years so McCann for $2M for a year seems reasonable to me, whether he's on the decline or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jamalshw said:

I like what Atlanta has done, but we haven't seen it work, yet, like we have in Houston. The Astros' rebuild led to a World Series and several years now of being amongst the best. Atlanta still has something to prove this year. They had a good year in 2018. They now need to build on that and seem to be on the right track to do just that.

Agreed. We still need to see how it plays out, but we certainly got a taste last season. I think Atlanta's success will be closely tied to how all their young, talented arms pan out. Or how they use some of those arms to fill other needs via trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I think they do have money to burn and they're paying for Donaldson's upside (i.e., potential MVP candidate). It seems like a good fit for both the team and the player. It gives Donaldson a chance to prove himself and reassert his value and the Braves another dangerous bat in the lineup. I also don't see anything wrong with the McCann deal. The Nats just signed Suzuki to $10M for two years so McCann for $2M for a year seems reasonable to me, whether he's on the decline or not. 

Maybe the Nats were the ones overpaying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...