Jump to content

Who’s your choice for most pleasant surprise of 2019?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I think he gets almost no hype on this board, and I think Frobby's right about why he doesn't. People talk a ton about Hall, GRod, Akin, Lowther, Pop, Kremer and probably others before Knight. 

Why should we? Because his results at the highest levels of college ball were excellent. He's not a 98-100 mph guy, but I think his stuff is plenty good to be a #2/#3 ML pitcher.

(Note: I'm obviously a little off with my assessment of his stuff. That has to be why he fell in the draft a bit and isn't a highly touted guy yet. Hopefully that statement about a change up that he made on the radio is a hint of improvements in stuff to come.)

I thought this was just for the majors... and Selma Hayek.  B|

But now that you mention it, Kremer's a good choice.  Seems like he has a good chance of making Baltimore's roster at some point this year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 179
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Please don't group him with honest curmudgeons such as myself.

I don't always agree with you, but you don't post uninformed drivel.  Although, you do like flogging the occasional dead horse.  Was that another Roberts PED reference?  :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NCRaven said:

I don't always agree with you, but you don't post uninformed drivel.  Although, you do like flogging the occasional dead horse.  Was that another Roberts PED reference?  ?

Sure was.

Next I'll mention Delmon Young's history of hate crimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Please don't group him with honest curmudgeons such as myself.

Sorry, I'll come up with a better term for him.  Sophist?  That may be giving too much credit.  Polemicist?  Mountebank?  Maybe I should look for words people have used post-1750.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Sorry, I'll come up with a better term for him.  Sophist?  That may be giving too much credit.  Polemicist?  Mountebank?  Maybe I should look for words people have used post-1750.

Or you could go pre-1750 and use something like crosspatch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I thought this was just for the majors... and Selma Hayek.  B|

But now that you mention it, Kremer's a good choice.  Seems like he has a good chance of making Baltimore's roster at some point this year.   

I tried the majors - Castro - but really don't have a lot of confidence in any of them. I really think the vast majority of potential FV is in Mullins and a couple of bullpen arms. The rest might have the upside of average regulars this year. Cobb, Villar and Givens could be good, but that's not really a surprise. They've all been good before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I don't always agree with you, but you don't post uninformed drivel.  Although, you do like flogging the occasional dead horse.  Was that another Roberts PED reference?  ?

Let's clarify for all. Brian Roberts, like David Ortiz, used PEDs to achieve the level of success they had in the MLB. Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spiritof66 said:

I was going to mention that we're probably too late for Lew Ford (who turned 42 last summer), but I was trying to uphold the dignity of the board.

Isn't that a bit like trying to uphold the dignity of the Orioles pitching staff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...