Jump to content

MASN dispute update


JohnD

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Judge says MASN should pay Nats based on MLB panel decision

 

Quote

Cohen heard renewed arguments Tuesday and denied a motion by the Nationals to reargue the case that led to his Aug. 22 decision to confirm the arbitration award. He said the sides should jointly submit a proposed judgment by Nov. 21 and also said the Orioles are not precluded from seeking recalculations of MASN profit distributions.

Why on earth would the Nationals want to reargue the case?  Maybe this is a typo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If I recall correctly, the ownership of the Orioles will be receiving money that is subject to revenue sharing instead of money that isn't.  As well as paying money to the Nationals that they were previously pocketing.

Correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If I recall correctly, the ownership of the Orioles will be receiving money that is subject to revenue sharing instead of money that isn't.  As well as paying money to the Nationals that they were previously pocketing.

No saying it was pocketed by the Orioles.    It was probably parked within MASN all this time.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

So both teams get an additional 99 million for 2012-16?


99M minus already disbursed TV fees to the clubs plus interest as determined by the court. Could be $100-$120M depending upon the interest rate and the compounding periods chosen.  MASN might have to take out a loan.  I expect more lawsuits to occur, just because  of past performance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beetlejuice said:


99M minus already disbursed TV fees to the clubs plus interest as determined by the court. Could be $100-$120M depending upon the interest rate and the compounding periods chosen.  MASN might have to take out a loan.  I expect more lawsuits to occur, just because  of past performance 

The money has been put aside pending the appeals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beetlejuice said:

True, but MASN’s maintenance of the money and the clerk’s interest determination are two different things.

I'm just guessing here but if the O's were not able to invest the money I don't see why interest would be an issue.

Edit- Oh interest has to be paid from April 15th on.  That won't be much at all in the grand scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...